Analysis | Digital Authoritarianism vs. Digital Democracy: Defending the Open Internet in an Era of Tech Fragmentation
Aminah Mustapha
At midnight on the eve of Gabon’s 2023 election, the entire nation’s internet went dark. The Government of Gabon had thrown the switch on a country-wide shutdown, a blunt display of digital authoritarianism aimed at quelling dissent. The government blackout halted Aisha Okoye’s protests against electoral fraud on WhatsApp. “We were cut off, left in the dark…,” she later said. Scenes like this are becoming alarmingly common. In 2023 alone, authorities shut down the Internet 283 times across 39 countries, marking the highest annual tally ever recorded, a 41 percent increase from the previous year. From targeted surveillance of journalists to blanket censorship of social media, authoritarian-leaning regimes are exploiting technology to tighten their grip on power. Digital authoritarianism and digital democracy are fracturing what the world once envisioned as a single, open internet. Geopolitics and values now shape the online experience in an era of tech fragmentation, often referred to as the “splinternet.” China’s Digital Silk Road and Russia’s cyber-sovereignty model pose a threat to the open internet, necessitating a U.S.-led diplomatic push with the EU and Global South to defend digital freedom.
The Rise of Digital Authoritarianism
“Digital authoritarianism” refers to the use of digital technology by authoritarian regimes to surveil, repress, and manipulate their populations. Many governments have adopted this model, inspired by China’s uses of high-tech censorship and AI-driven facial recognition, along with a social credit system, to control citizens’ behavior. While Russia employs repressive legal controls and intimidation, it has also passed laws to isolate its internet and censor content. Both China and Russia inspire other regimes to silence critics, often under “fake news” pretexts, eroding internet freedom in 59 countries since 2015. Authoritarian states push for state-centric governance at the UN, fracturing the internet into walled-off digital realms that undermine the global common good and shift power dynamics.
China’s Digital Silk Road: Exporting Orwellian Tech
China’s Digital Silk Road (DSR), part of the Belt and Road Initiative, exports surveillance technology to the Global South by offering government-backed loans that fund the purchase of Chinese systems. Through firms like Huawei, ZTE, and Hikvision, China supplies facial recognition, AI monitoring tools, and data centers, often bundled into infrastructure deals backed by over $160 billion in financing to African nations. More than 24 African countries utilize “smart government” systems, such as Uganda’s Safe City, which enables mass surveillance under the guise of security. China’s “cyber-sovereignty” model, prioritizing state control, aided Nigeria’s 2020 #EndSARS crackdown and empowered repression in Zambia. These “loans-for-tech” deals grant Chinese firms vast data access within these countries, risking “digital colonization” as lenient privacy standards erode rights in fragile democracies, weakening democratic norms globally. Without transparency or human rights safeguards, the DSR’s expansion threatens civil liberties, embedding Chinese surveillance values globally, and challenging the balance between technological progress and individual freedoms.
Russia’s Playbook and the Allure of Control
Russia complements China’s hardware with a software-driven approach, exporting disinformation, legal curbs, and troll farms to its allies in Central Asia and Venezuela. Its 2019 “Sovereign RuNet” law aims to isolate the Internet, inspiring Iran and Myanmar to mandate local data control. Internet shutdowns in Sudan and Ethiopia exemplify this model, resulting in $1.9 billion in costs in 2023 alone. Additionally, the Kremlin’s disinformation campaigns, notorious for meddling in foreign elections and flooding social media with false narratives, have inspired authoritarian actors globally to destabilize democracies. By manipulating information and intimidating tech firms to silence opposition without requiring China’s costly Great Firewall, Russia offers a low-cost repression toolkit that will appeal to nations with limited infrastructure but strong repressive ambitions, thereby fragmenting the internet and bolstering authoritarian influence in global tech governance.
Africa: Battleground for the Open Internet
Nowhere is the struggle between digital democracy and authoritarianism more vivid than in Africa. As such, Africa’s digital boom, with internet access rising from 20 percent in 2020 to a projected 75 percent by 2030, fuels opportunity but also repression. Governments across Africa utilize 266 Chinese tech projects, like Zimbabwe’s facial recognition system, to monitor critics. Social media taxes in Uganda and Tanzania mimic China’s censorship, stifling expression. Yet, African agency shines: in 2018, Kenyan bloggers challenged provisions of the Computer Misuse and Cybercrime Act, leading to a temporary suspension of sections that could restrict free speech. Youth and innovators push for an open internet, aligning with the African Union’s Agenda 2063 for inclusive growth. Africa is a battleground where digital democracy and authoritarianism collide. Internet shutdowns, online surveillance, arrests over anti-government posts, and social media taxes often use other tools to curb criticism and threaten democratic gains. Africa stands as a critical battleground, where reform-minded voices and authoritarian control vie to define its digital future.
Defending the Open Internet: Diplomacy and Alliances
Get Institute for the Study of Diplomacy’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
The United States is rallying democracies to counter this threat. In 2022, it launched the Declaration for the Future of the Internet with 60 partners, including Senegal and Niger, to promote a free digital ecosystem. As the 2023 chair of the Freedom Online Coalition, Deputy Secretary Wendy Sherman prioritized combating repression, regulating AI ethically, and advancing inclusion. The Biden administration banned spyware linked to human rights abuses and secured UN leadership for Doreen Bogdan-Martin to advocate against censorship. The proposed D10 alliance (G7 plus India, South Korea, and Australia) and the Global Partnership on AI exclude authoritarian tech, fostering innovation with Global South allies such as Kenya and Ghana. The EU’s Global Gateway supports rights-based infrastructure, which funds rights-based digital infrastructure in Africa, Asia, and Latin America and promotes the export control of surveillance tools. However, U.S. diplomacy drives the coalition, aligning trade and tech policies to shape a democratic digital order.
Toward a Democratic Digital Future: Policy Recommendations
How can the community of democracies and rights-respecting nations best defend the open internet in this era of fragmentation? Policymakers must combine narrative reframing, proactive support, and hard-edged tools to respond effectively. To counter digital authoritarianism, democracies must unite and take decisive action. First, democracies should forge a Digital Democracy Alliance to strengthen platforms like the Freedom Online Coalition, aligning policies on 5G security, AI ethics, and internet governance. This united front can champion an open, multi-stakeholder internet at global forums like the UN and counter authoritarian narratives.
Second, democracies should offer developing nations affordable, rights-respecting digital infrastructure. The EU’s Global Gateway and U.S. Partnership for Digital Infrastructure aim to connect 1 billion Africans by 2030. By mobilizing development finance and fostering public-private partnerships, democracies can provide secure alternatives to Chinese and Russian technology, ensuring connectivity without compromising freedom.
Third, democracies should impose strict consequences for digital repression. The United States and the EU should expand sanctions on surveillance technology firms, such as Hikvision, and restrict the export of spyware. Regimes that enforce internet shutdowns or mass censorship should face UN resolutions and conditionalities on aid or trade, signaling that such violations carry a significant diplomatic cost.
Fourth, democracies should bolster civil society and digital resilience. Increased funding for the U.S. Open Technology Fund and EU programs can support digital rights NGOs, independent media, and developers of tools that circumvent censorship. Training activists to evade surveillance and enhance digital literacy education will counter disinformation and empower communities in authoritarian states.
Finally, democracies should champion an inclusive, trust-based internet that drives prosperity and dignity. Unlike authoritarian promises of “order,” digital democracy fosters entrepreneurship and better services, as seen in Estonia. Diplomats must promote this vision globally, amplifying the voices of leaders from the Global South who advocate for openness to demonstrate that it’s a universal goal, not a Western imposition. Through unity, investment, and advocacy, democracies can safeguard a free internet.
In conclusion, the world is at a crossroads. Down one path lies a fragmented technosphere of digital despots, national firewalls, and omnipresent surveillance, a future where the internet splinters into echo chambers patrolled by Big Brother. Down the other path lies a reaffirmation of the internet’s founding promise: a borderless common that empowers individuals, spreads knowledge, and holds power to account. Defending the open Internet in this era of technology fragmentation will not be easy. It demands unity among democracies, creative diplomacy that includes the Global South, and a willingness to confront authoritarian tech head-on. Yet, as recent diplomatic wins and alliances indicate, momentum is building for a course correction. An open, secure, and inclusive internet remains within reach if the world’s democracies speak with one voice and act with a unified purpose.
Aminah Mustapha is a researcher and legal analyst focused on the intersection of digital sovereignty, international security, and AI governance in the Global South. This op-ed draws on her academic work, which examines how emerging technologies are reshaping power dynamics between democratic and authoritarian regimes, particularly across Africa.
Interested in learning more about the role of the internet and the digital realm in matters of security? Check ISD’s in-depth case studies library and join the faculty lounge to access free instructor copies:
