How Barack Obama Killed America’s Trade Schools
The gainful employment rule, the college-for-all cult, and the skilled labor shortage Democrats refuse to take credit for.
Somewhere in Ohio tonight, a factory floor runs short a machinist. A hospital in Phoenix waits six weeks for an HVAC repair. A contractor in New Jersey turns away paying work because he cannot find one electrician under forty.
None of this is an act of God. It is the harvest of a policy choice, planted in Washington between 2009 and 2017 by a president who spent eight years insisting that every child in America deserved a bachelor’s degree.
Barack Obama did not hate welders. He simply governed as if they did not exist.
The Rule That Ate 840,000 Seats
Start with the weapon.
In 2014, Obama’s Education Department issued the gainful employment rule, a regulation that severed federal student aid from career programs whose graduates carried too much debt relative to what they earned.
On paper, the target was predatory schools selling expensive credentials with little economic value. In practice, the weapon was far less precise.
The rule struck the part of American higher education built for people who wanted a job skill without spending four years at a university. These programs trained mechanics, dental assistants, HVAC technicians, medical workers, computer technicians, and network administrators. The Education Department’s own estimate projected that roughly 1,400 programs enrolling 840,000 students would fail its standards.
Then came the closures.
Corinthian Colleges, once a giant of career education, collapsed in 2015 after the department squeezed off its access to federal aid. ITT Technical Institute followed in 2016, shutting more than 100 campuses and leaving tens of thousands of students scrambling to finish their education elsewhere. DeVry, Career Education Corporation and Education Management Corporation also closed campuses, sold schools or abandoned programs as federal pressure intensified.
Were there diploma mills in the wreckage? Yes. Corinthian had earned years of scrutiny over recruiting practices, job-placement claims, and student outcomes. No serious defense of vocational education requires defending fraud.
The deeper failure was Washington’s refusal to build a serious mechanism for separating fraud from function. A school deceiving students deserved punishment. A career program producing employable graduates did not deserve the same treatment simply because its students borrowed money.
Instead of designing a regulatory scalpel, the administration reached for a guillotine and called the result quality control.
Programs disappeared faster than anyone replaced them.
Classrooms closed. Welding booths went to auction. Training seats vanished. Students who never wanted a four-year degree lost another route into the labor market.
Washington proved efficient at destroying capacity. Nobody seemed nearly as interested in replacing what disappeared.
College for All, Dignity for None
The regulation was only part of the problem. The deeper issue was cultural. In Obama’s America, there seemed to be one approved path for an eighteen-year-old: go to a four-year college, live on a campus with a climbing wall and graduate with a diploma and a mountain of debt.
Get Shirley Kher’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Mike Rowe spent years pointing out how absurd this had become. America’s obsession with college had turned skilled trades into a consolation prize, something you did if the “real” college route did not work out. He was right. The White House showed little interest in listening.
Then follow the money.
In its 2015 budget, the Obama administration proposed pulling $100 million from Perkins Career and Technical Education state grants. Those grants were a major source of federal support for high school and community college trade programs. The administration wanted to redirect the money into a new competitive innovation fund.
The districts most likely to take the hit were rural and low-income communities. Many depended on formula-based Perkins funding to keep vocational programs running. Congress rejected the proposal, but the thinking behind it was hard to miss.
Consider the timing. American manufacturers were struggling to find machinists and other skilled workers. Yet the administration wanted to take money from one of the most dependable sources of vocational education funding and move it into another experimental federal initiative.
At the very moment employers were asking for more skilled tradespeople, Washington was considering taking money away from the programs training them.
The Fig Leaf
Defenders of the administration’s record point to community colleges. In 2012, the Labor Department proudly announced $500 million for job-training partnerships.
Community colleges do valuable work. But a competitive grant program is not a workforce pipeline, and an associate degree is not an apprenticeship.
The administration kept gravitating toward training that looked and felt like college: campuses, classrooms, credentials, institutional branding. The traditional trades lived somewhere else, on shop floors, in garages, inside machine rooms, beneath OSHA signs and around the smell of cutting fluid.
That distinction mattered. Washington poured money into institutions that fit the academic model while burdening many of the career schools and trade programs that did not. The message was hard to miss: vocational training earned support when it resembled college. When it looked like the trades, the enthusiasm faded.
The Bill Comes Due
Now the arithmetic, because arithmetic is what remains when the speeches end. Deloitte and the Manufacturing Institute project that 2.1 million American manufacturing jobs could sit unfilled by 2030, at a potential cost of $1 trillion in that year alone. The updated study is no prettier: 3.8 million manufacturing positions needed by 2033, nearly half of them at risk of going empty.
Those are not abstractions. They are unbuilt houses and delayed bridges, factories that cannot expand, hospitals that cannot get their air handlers fixed. They are also the wages never earned by the kids who were told trade school was for failures, then handed a federal loan for a degree millions of them never finished.
Notice the symmetry. The student debt crisis and the skilled labor shortage are twins, delivered in the same hospital. Push a generation away from the toolbox and into the lecture hall and you get both crises at once.
The party that brands itself the friend of the working man spent eight years building an education policy with no room in it for working men.
What Cannot Be Unclosed
Betsy DeVos repealed the gainful employment rule in 2019, and the op-ed pages clutched their pearls on schedule. But you cannot unclose a school.
The campuses were sold to developers. The instructors scattered into other careers and did not come back. The eighteen-year-olds who might have become pipefitters in 2014 are thirty now, carrying debt from degrees they never used, in a country that cannot find enough people to wire its buildings or fix its machines.
In Elkhart, Indiana, in 2016, Obama told a town hall that some jobs of the past were just not coming back. He meant factory jobs.
He said nothing about the schools.
Did you find this essay interesting? Consider reposting it so your followers get a chance to read it too.
