Like a Version
Who are we really?
Most people think change starts with the behaviour.
Drink less.
Scroll less.
Work less.
Rest more.
Say no.
Stop reacting.
Stop overthinking.
It makes sense that we start there. Behaviour is visible. It is measurable. It is the thing we can point to and say, “THIS! This is the problem.”
But behaviour rarely exists on its own.
It usually belongs to a much larger system.
A behaviour often protects a version of us that learned how to survive, perform, belong, avoid rejection, stay impressive, stay needed, or stay in control.
That version of us may not be happy.
But it is familiar.
And familiar can feel safe.
This is part of why change can feel so strange. We can genuinely want something different and still feel ourselves being pulled back toward the old pattern.
We might want to drink less, but part of us worries we will become boring.
We might want to rest more, but part of us worries we will become lazy.
We might want to stop overworking, but part of us worries we will become irrelevant.
We might want to ask for help, but part of us worries people will see us differently.
The behaviour is no longer just a behaviour anymore.
It has become attached to a story, a narrative about who we are, not just what we do.
I am the fun one.
I am the reliable one.
I am the one who can handle it.
I am the intense one.
I am the one who does not need help.
I am the one who keeps going.
These stories are not necessarily false. That is what makes them sticky.
They often begin as observations. Maybe we really are the reliable one. Maybe we did learn to perform well under pressure. Maybe being funny, intense, productive, useful, independent, or unbothered helped us get through things.
The problem is that these observations can harden into rules for being.
And once a story becomes a rule, the inner critic usually gets hired on as rule enforcement.
It says:
Do not slow down.
Do not be boring.
Do not need too much.
Do not fall behind.
Do not let people see that.
Do not become ordinary.
Do not lose control.
The tone can be brutal.
The function is often protection.
That distinction matters.
The inner critic is not wise. It is not some sacred truth-teller living in your skull with a tiny clipboard and excellent credentials. It is a protective system with terrible manners.
It is trying to prevent something.
Failure.
Rejection.
Humiliation.
Disappointment.
Loss of control.
The terrifying unknown of becoming someone we have not yet practised being.
So when we try to change, the critic does not simply evaluate the behaviour. It evaluates the risk to identity.
If I stop drinking at parties, why am I there?
If I stop overworking, am I still valuable?
If I stop being the easygoing one, will people still want me around?
If I stop criticizing myself, will I become complacent?
That last one is especially nefarious.
We are afraid that without self-criticism, we will collapse into laziness, selfishness, mediocrity, or chaos.
Get Jaime B. Jenkins MSc MAPP’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
So the critic says.
Not because it feels good.
Because it feels useful.
This is where change gets complicated.
We can know a behaviour is costing them something and still feel threatened by changing it. Not because we are weak. Not because we are irrational. But because the old behaviour is doing more than one job.
It provides relief.
It preserves identity.
It keeps the system familiar.
And the familiar self feels safe.
This is why “just stop it” is such useless advice. Tiny advice gremlin. No nuance. Very confident. Almost always underqualified.
The useful question is not:
“What is wrong with me?”
It is:
“What version of me does this behaviour protect?”
That question opens a different door.
Maybe the behaviour protects the version of us who learned that being impressive was safer than being honest.
Maybe it protects the version of you who learned that needing people was risky.
Maybe it protects the version of you who learned that rest had to be earned.
Maybe it protects the version of you who believes life without intensity will feel flat.
Once you can see that, the goal is not to declare war on yourself.
The goal is to separate the behaviour from the identity.
“I drank too much” is different from “I have no control.”
“I felt anxious” is different from “I am weak.”
“I needed relief” is different from “I am failing.”
That conversion matters.
Because once a behaviour becomes an identity, change becomes harder. You are no longer experimenting with a pattern. You are threatening a story.
And stories do not change just because we yell at them.
They change when we gather new evidence.
One small experiment at a time.
We try resting and notice we do not become useless.
We go to the event differently and notice we are still interesting.
We ask for help and notice respect does not disappear.
We let the critic speak, but stop treating its tone as proof.
This is not about becoming a completely different person.
It is about updating the rules.
Some parts of you may be outdated.
Some may be overworked.
Some may be protecting you from threats that are no longer present.
Some may simply need better options.
We do not have to destroy the version of us that helped us survive.
But you also do not have to let it run the whole show.
Change becomes possible when we can say:
Thank you for trying to protect me.
Also…we are not doing it that way anymore.
