Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
How would that be better than using |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I just found out that much of what I'm after already happens with tox.ini |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi
I searched the web as much as I could but I found only similar topics, and not quite what I have in mind
clutter in pyproject.toml or in the root folder can get very messy, and you already have 3 tools :o)
I was wondering if it would make sense to add the capability to use
tool.tomlmy idea is that, eventually, every tool that goes in pyproject.toml could have the capability to be put in this
tool.tomlI know that
uvused to have a toolS.toml, and that using yet a new file with the singular will create some confusion for many, but bear with me...currently Astral has
ruff.tomluv.tomlty.tomland their equivalent[tool.ruff][tool.uv][tool.ty]in pyproject.tomlhere my main assumption: using headers like
the file name
toolsingular, being the same as in the pyproject's headersparsing ease assuming that something similar already happens for
[tool.ruff.lint]/ pyproject.toml <->[lint]/ ruff.toml etc.if this assumptions are correct, and Astral (meaning ruff + uv + ty) is interested and leads this, other tools could have an easier path to eventually do the same (wrote some on purpose in the example)
I don't think this is something that should start from a PEP, but from the tools
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions