🔴 LOAN: RESURGIÓ LA TEORÍA DEL ACCIDENTE Y ANALIZAN VACIAR UNA LAGUNA

HighlightNow

👉 A 5 meses de la sustracción del menor Loan Danilo Peña, en un paraje de 9 de Julio en Corrientes, la querella solicitó que se investigara la hipótesis del accidente y posterior descarte del cuerpo.  👉 Seguí en #Alerta24/7

Transcript

00:00This is not a joke. We are not two months away from the disappearance of Loan, but we are almost six months away.

00:09This is information that German gave in Andino y las Noticias very early, in A24, and we are going to delve into it.

00:17Because it has to do with this that we have talked so much about in this program, especially with Nahuel.

00:24And some measures that were taken, do you remember when they decided to do all the tracking?

00:29Again, the same that the provincial court had done, thousands of people in the Algarrobal looking for a trace of Loan.

00:39Well, the novelty is that they asked to drain, listen well, to drain a lagoon.

00:47Four lagoons are, one in particular, which is the closest to Naranjal, they are going to drain.

00:55Explain to me how? They do not have for the remit, the federal justice does not have for the remit, we already count it here.

01:03Nahuel must be stirring up to listen to this, right? At least he's not here today.

01:08Look at the word, you have to come up with words for what you want to ask.

01:12It was re-traced, right? It was traced for the second, third time.

01:17The court did it, asked, the SIFEBU body participated, if I remember correctly.

01:24Which is the body in charge of supervising all these tracings.

01:28Well, the court already did it, the lawyers of the Loan family already asked, they took the dogs.

01:35Even at some point they asked for this new tracking, they did not approach the dogs because of a logistical issue, but it does not matter.

01:43They ask again, what they want to do is exhaust the hypothesis of the alligator.

01:51Yes.

01:52Although, do you think that after six months, almost six months after the disappearance of Loan, we have to go back to the same thing?

02:00What I wonder is how justice gives it, you know that we count from here.

02:05They asked for the detention of Luvaldi, that of Esteve, mine, that of Nahuel.

02:09They asked for the detention of the judge, the detention of the lawyers, they asked for the detention of everyone.

02:13And justice said, stop fooling around with these requests that all they do is gain time.

02:19Go and see for what. They are diverting the investigation in the search for Loan.

02:24Now, the question I ask myself, why does justice give course to the request made by the law firm to empty a lagoon?

02:34Yes.

02:35Five months later, to empty a lagoon, a place that has already been tracked, and we always say it, by federal forces.

02:42You can think what you want, but federal forces, I was going to say a bad word, you can not deflect it easily.

02:52They are experts in the search for people and in the search for human remains.

02:57In this case, this work has already been done.

03:00Well, I heard Rafa Palacios say yesterday that this drainage of the lagoon would support the hypothesis, the theory of the accident.

03:11Sure.

03:12The theory of the accident.

03:13What I always did in Nahuel, if there was an accident, where is the body?

03:16Of course.

03:17It should be in the vicinity, at least.

03:19Is it the defense or the court that insists on this?

03:22Because one can understand that the lawyers, I do not know, ECODACI at the time, insist on the theory of the accident.

03:30Some or the other defendant that serves, I do not know, I say Benitez, Ramírez or Millapi, Hanson,

03:36who says, yes, you have to drag the lagoons, you have to drain.

03:40Logically, that takes a lot of time.

03:43And what else do the defenses want than to divert the investigation, to put sticks in the wheel, to waste time?

03:50But no.

03:51This measure is requested by the court, headed by Juan Pablo Gallego, by Dr. Roberto Méndez, to drain a lagoon.

03:59How is it done?

04:01To drain a lagoon, you have to divert a stream of water.

04:05I really say a work that must be seen if there is evidence to do so.

04:08Yes, it is a hydraulic work.

04:09Yes.

04:10They did not have, remember you, they did not have money to pay a remit to take to testify to the people who cited the justice.

04:17And now they are going to drain a lagoon.

04:20Can you imagine the show of this?

04:22Can you imagine the machines taking out the water?

04:25I do not know how it is done.

04:27They are going to write to us.

04:29Emptying.

04:30There are four lagoons, as our graph says.

04:32There are four lagoons that they want to drag.

04:35And at least one of them, dry it.

04:38To take out all the water, you ask me, it is exactly on the other side.

04:45It is exactly on the other side.

04:46Yes, we would have to find out how it is done.

04:48But it seems very clear to me that there are resources for certain things.

04:52There is money for certain investigations, or tracking, or investigations.

04:57And on the other side, there are investigations that do not appear, that were done, that were not done.

05:02I say there are four that have not been tracked yet.

05:04No.

05:05Well, why have not they been tracked yet?

05:07I do not know, without knowing what is in the lagoon.

05:09Just now comes that request.

05:10Why was it not done before?

05:12I say, there are several questions.

05:13I am going to give a data, I am going to give a data of expertise that I have had to cover in other situations.

05:18God willing that Loan is fine and that it appears at some point safe and sound and that all this is a nightmare.

05:24But there are scientific data that say, if there is an accident, if there is a body in the water,

05:3148 hours after being submerged, sorry, but I say it as it is,

05:3648 hours after a body has been submerged in the water, it floats.

05:42We are not talking about the Paraná, which has kilometers and kilometers and has an impossible current,

05:48and which is more dangerous than the sea.

05:50We are talking about a lagoon that, walking, you can track if you want.

05:56And from the edge you realize if there is something or not.

05:59These images that we are seeing are one of the lagoons that were tracked.

06:03And I assure you that you would tell a prefecture tactical diver,

06:07let's investigate here, the diver will tell you, don't waste my time.

06:12It's fishing in a fish tank, right?

06:15I mean, with respect to the initial search that was done,

06:19it was done by the best specialists in Argentina, right?

06:24Yes, completely.

06:25Federal police divers.

06:27Do you remember the images?

06:29That one said, well, like this, like this, looking meter by meter, walking, there it is.

06:34Yes.

06:35That's the image, look.

06:36We didn't know either.

06:37Look at the image.

06:38We didn't know either, Diego, do you remember with the four in leather,

06:41walking in the water, which seemed to be more ...

06:43Yes, the first days.

06:44Yes, it doesn't matter.

06:45You know what happens, Lu?

06:46That a tracking can also be done that way.

06:49But I insist, there is no possibility that, due to an accident,

06:57Lohan's body is in a lagoon.

07:02They're going to tell me, they're going to tell me, yes, watch out.

07:05They made us talk about this again.

07:06Sure, if they put weight on it, yes.

07:08Sorry, but these are details.

07:10They took us back to the accident theory.

07:12Yes.

07:13I want to remember yesterday, because you saw that you have to,

07:15all the time you have to bring elements,

07:17because if not, one would believe that this is a novelty, a surprise,

07:21if the request is a novelty.

07:23Now, look at the image.

07:24Yes.

07:25Again and again, I can't stop being surprised.

07:26Yes.

07:27It was done on foot, four security officers,

07:31walking hand in hand,

07:33stepping centimeter by centimeter,

07:36each of these, of these low-depth lagoons.

07:40You see, they are walking through the center of the lagoon

07:43and the water, luckily, reaches their waist.

07:47I would be interested, sorry, to know what hypothesis

07:49they are using to make these clippings, right?

07:52Because…

07:53Well, that's what I was going to say.

07:54That's a bit what I said at the beginning.

07:55That's what I was going to say, because…

07:56Are they reinforcing the accident or not?

07:58You have to concatenate elements.

08:00I mean, if it ended up in a lagoon near the farm,

08:02it's because one understands that something happened

08:06and that something caused the discarding of Lohan's body.

08:12You have to say it like that, brutally, because…

08:14Yes.

08:15It's the hypothesis, logically, that is discarded.

08:18If that happened, there must have been some other trace.

08:22Do you remember?

08:23A lot of specialized dogs,

08:25including those who sniffed Lohan in Pérez's truck.

08:30And that proof?

08:32Well…

08:34If the truck, both the truck and the red Forca,

08:38had traces of Lohan,

08:40how do we put them in the movie

08:43that Lohan appeared in a lagoon near the farm?

08:48I mean, there were no traces of a vehicle entering that field.

08:54There were a few traces,

08:57but there are elements that seem strong.

09:00The boot, for example.

09:01Yes, completely.

09:02The boot that appears, but does not appear in the movie.

09:06I wanted to say yesterday,

09:07Tito González, Carlos Pérez's lawyer.

09:10Yes.

09:11To whom…

09:13Better than him.

09:14Thank you, Vani.

09:15Achievement of all.

09:16It's a great note.

09:17Yes, great note.

09:18With Tito González, we had never spoken to him.

09:21We asked questions to Tito González.

09:24Yes, he answered everything.

09:25And he had an answer for everything.

09:27In some, we logically disagree,

09:29but a question was the key.

09:31The theory of the accident.

09:33Yes.

09:34Do you remember when Codazzi took Laudelina

09:37between roosters and midnight

09:39to the Attorney General's Office?

09:41Tito González said it yesterday.

09:42Lawyer with a license in Corrientes

09:44saying to the prosecutor's office,

09:46forget it,

09:47do not open on a Friday night.

09:49No.

09:50You have to come back on Monday,

09:52unless it is a triple homicide

09:55that has happened at that time.

09:57If not, forget it,

09:58go on Monday at 8 in the morning.

10:00No, more when there is a federal justice

10:02investigating a provincial prosecutor,

10:04do not get involved.

10:06Do not get involved in the middle of that mess.

10:08Well, the theory of the accident

10:10was one of the questions

10:12that we were forced to ask Tito González.

10:16Because, of course,

10:17if it had been an accident,

10:19it was an unbeatable scenario

10:21for his two defendants,

10:23for María Victoria Caixaba and Carlos Pérez,

10:25because it would be a guilty homicide,

10:30a homicide without the intention of causing it,

10:33the product of an accident,

10:35a negligence,

10:37a low penalty that you can discuss,

10:39even later achieve some benefit

10:42and in a couple of years go home

10:44and not be accused of a federal crime

10:47with an investigation that has to be deepened,

10:50that has already been extended,

10:51that will surely make you spend even more months,

10:55maybe half a year,

10:56a year until the trial arrives,

10:58imprisoned,

11:00and, I say, due to the social pressure there is,

11:03they will hardly escape a sentence.

11:07Two of the most forceful evidence

11:09are those that weigh on Carlos Pérez

11:11and on Caixaba,

11:12the smell test,

11:16odorological.

11:17Yes, yes, yes, the smell in their car.

11:19The smell detected by the dogs.

11:22A legal negotiation.

11:24Yesterday Nahuel said,

11:27it's easier to invent an accident

11:30and make it look like an accident

11:32and get them out of a life sentence.

11:37Where is the body?

11:39What happened to the body?

11:40Was it an accident?

11:41People wrote to me yesterday and said,

11:42no, but because he was drunk,

11:44he didn't want to be caught.

11:46No, if he's drunk,

11:48it's still a penalty, even executable.

11:51It also depends on the current legislation.

11:54Where is Lohan's body if it was an accident?

11:56Well, the thing is,

11:57there will be a perpetual prison,

11:58there is evidence for that.

12:00Completely, that's very good.

12:01The hypothesis of the accident is reinforced

12:03if, on the other hand,

12:04there is a counter-arrest

12:08that is more serious than that of the accident.

12:11Because at the moment there may be executions

12:13because there is not enough evidence

12:14for the detainees to be detained.

12:16Look, to give...

12:17I'll give you this data.

12:18Go ahead.

12:19I know, Hanson said it,

12:20Tito González said it yesterday,

12:23Richard Vallejos,

12:25Masiel's lawyer, said it.

12:27Everyone agrees,

12:29even Dr. Gallego,

12:31also a family lawyer,

12:33everyone agrees that

12:36some of the people

12:38who know so much more

12:41than those who are detained,

12:43are free.

12:45Yes.

12:46There would be people free

12:48who would know what happened to Lohan

12:51or could give information

12:53to give with Lohan,

12:54to give with some certainty.

12:56Two names appear,

12:58Camila and Macarena.

13:01Macarena is the daughter of Laudelina.

13:03Camila, Lohan's political cousin,

13:07they are very close,

13:08they were both in the orange house.

13:10And there are the experts.

13:11Yes.

13:13Do they know

13:16what the lagoons have to do with it?

13:18Do the lagoons have anything to do with it?

13:21Could they say they have to do

13:23with the lagoons

13:25with the disappearance of Lohan?

13:26Could Lohan be in one of these four lagoons

13:29that were not tracked?

13:30Alert and we try to report.

Category

Transcript

Be the first to comment

Recommended