Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 7 months ago
At a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) questioned NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya about NIH cuts to Alzheimer's research.
Transcript
00:00To turn to the chair of the committee, who we're very honored to have with us, Senator Collins.
00:05Thank you very much, Senator Capito.
00:08Doctor, let me start by welcoming you to the committee.
00:13I am well aware that you have devoted your life to medical research, to health economics,
00:21and that you care very deeply about NIH.
00:25That is why the administration's reduction of more than $19 billion to the agency's budget,
00:37that is approximately 40%, is so disturbing.
00:43It would undo years of congressional investment in NIH,
00:49and it would delay or stop effective treatments and cures from being developed
00:58for diseases like Alzheimer's, cancer, type 1 diabetes.
01:05I could go on and on.
01:08We also risk falling behind China and other countries
01:14that are increasing their investment in biomedical research.
01:20Let me give a specific example.
01:25There are an estimated 7 million Americans living with Alzheimer's today.
01:32Barring any major breakthrough to prevent, slow down, or cure this devastating disease,
01:41this number could almost double to claim the lives of more than 13 million Americans by the year 2060.
01:51And that's why this committee has been so dedicated to increasing the funding for biomedical research
02:00and for Alzheimer's in particular to more than $3 billion last year alone.
02:07And it's produced results.
02:09We've seen the first two drugs that have been shown when administered early enough to slow cognitive decline.
02:19We have also seen the development of a breakthrough blood test,
02:25which will help lead to earlier diagnosis.
02:29Yet the administration's budget proposes a decrease of 40% for the National Institute on Aging,
02:37which funds most Alzheimer's research.
02:40As a senator representing the oldest state in the nation, this is of particular concern to me.
02:52And like Senator Capito, I too lost my father to this devastating disease,
02:59as well as my grandfather, two uncles, and just last year, a brother-in-law.
03:05So I know personally what it means to so many American families.
03:11Why is the administration proposing to cut the funding for the National Institutes of Aging
03:21when we are making progress in treating Alzheimer's and other dementias?
03:28Senator Capito, thank you for the question.
03:31So first, let me just say that I am fully committed to making progress, scientific progress, on Alzheimer's.
03:36I know all too well from my own research work and from friends and family members the devastating toll of this disease.
03:44And we have made tremendous progress.
03:47The NIH supports a very wide range of hypotheses on Alzheimer's,
03:52and it's resulted in some advances, like, for instance, the blood test for early detection.
03:56We still don't have, I think, in my professional opinion, a sufficient way to manage the disease,
04:03to prevent the disease, and to cure the disease.
04:06We need more advances.
04:07And so I'm absolutely committed to making sure the NIH plays a tremendous role in that.
04:12The president wrote a letter to Michael Kratzios, his science advisor,
04:16committing the United States to be the leading nation in the world in biomedicine.
04:22And so that's the intention of this administration.
04:26The budget, I mean, this is my first time through this budget fight, and so I just, I'm still learning.
04:31But I'll tell you, what I understand is that this, the budget is a collaborative effort between Congress and the administration.
04:40And I look forward to working with you all to advance the needs, the real health needs of not just the folks here in the room
04:47who represent Alzheimer's patients, but also the health needs of all Americans.
04:51We have tremendous health needs that we have to address.
04:53It's only excellent research that's going to solve those problems.
04:56We look forward to working with you to remedy these problems and the deficiencies in the budget.
05:04Prior to your confirmation, NIH abruptly and without any notice or input from the scientific community
05:14announced a 15% arbitrary cap on research-related costs, also called indirect costs,
05:24for institutions that receive grants from the NIH.
05:30This proposed cap is so poorly conceived, and I have seen firsthand how harmful it is.
05:39It is leading to scientists leaving the United States for opportunities in other countries.
05:48It's causing clinical trials to be halted and promising medical research to be abandoned.
05:57It's also against federal law.
06:01Since 2018, we in Congress have specifically included language to prevent NIH from arbitrarily imposing such a cap.
06:14During your confirmation hearing, you committed to working with us on this issue,
06:20so I was alarmed and surprised that the administration's budget request contains the same harmful 15% cap.
06:31Recently, I met with Dr. Calvin Drogenmeyer, who was President Trump's science advisor during the first term.
06:41He has come up with two possible models, which are far fairer, make way more sense, increase accountability.
06:52Have you had the opportunity to meet with Dr. Drogenmeyer and look at the models that he has come up with
07:02after extensive consultation?
07:05So I spoke with Dr. Drogenmeyer before he started the process, and he told me about those proposals,
07:12but in the planning stages.
07:14I have not yet met with him after the – because he had a working group that he put together of experts to think about this.
07:21I just – and I think they're quite promising.
07:25The key thing – first, I can't speak about the 15% because it's subject to litigation,
07:29so I'm not going to – I don't want to get into that, but I want to bring the broader policy issue,
07:34which is how should the federal government support the research institutions in this country
07:38where the research we've been talking about take place.
07:40I think it is an opportunity to rethink that.
07:44We absolutely have an obligation to make sure that the institutions have the capacity to do the research correctly.
07:51Are we doing it fairly?
07:52Do we have processes in place that you have sufficient geographic representation
07:57that scientists across the country, wherever they are, have access?
08:01I think we can do a lot better, and I'd love to work with Congress to address that.
08:07I think there's lots of great possibilities for reform.
08:10I encourage you to sit down with Dr. Drogenmeyer as soon as you can.
08:16Thank you, Madam Chair.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended