Abhijit Chavda Decodes Trump 2.0, Adani, Deep State & Global Power Shifts

Asianet News English

Geopolitical expert Abhijit Chavda joins for an explosive discussion on Trump 2.0, Adani, and the hidden hands shaping world politics. He analyses the Deep State’s influence, India’s global ascent, Russian oil trade, and Pakistan’s uncertain future—offering a sharp lens on the new world power play in motion.  #AbhijitChavda #Trump #Modi #Adani #DeepState #Russia #Pakistan #Geopolitics #India  🔊 LIKE ➡ SHARE ➡ SUBSCRIBE  Download the Asianet News App now!  Available on Android & iOS  👉 Android:  https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.vserv.asianet&hl=en_IN   👉 iOS:  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/asianet-news-official/id1093450032   For More Updates:  Follow us on our What's app Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va5Bq3yKwqSLSQTxam0r  English: https://newsable.asianetnews.com/  Hindi: https://hindi.asianetnews.com/  Malayalam: https://www.asianetnews.com/  Kannada: https://kannada.asianetnews.com/  Tamil: https://tamil.asianetnews.com/  Telugu: https://telugu.asianetnews.com/  Bengali: https://bangla.asianetnews.com/  Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AsianetNewsa...  Follow us on Twitter:  https://twitter.com/AsianetNewsEN  Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ann.newsable/  ➡ If you like our video, give us a thumbs up and subscribe to our channel to get the daily dosage of news, entertainment, sports and more.

Transcript

00:00Do you see India-US ties will be facing a lot of trouble

00:03till Trump sits at the helm in the United States?

00:06When we become a 10 or 15 trillion dollar economy,

00:09they expect that India will be a totally different kind of beast.

00:13They don't want to see in the future a new challenger rising on the horizon.

00:18So the US now seems to have changed its policy towards India

00:21from a policy of cooperation to a policy of containment.

00:25Should India stop buying Russian oil?

00:27We don't want to undermine Russia's world standing.

00:30Russia is important for us.

00:31We don't want Russia's economy to suffer

00:33because it is very important for us.

00:34It gives us leverage over the West.

00:36How governments are being toppled in Asia?

00:38We have example of Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal,

00:42any sort of US deep state at work in India to destabilize the current government.

00:46India, I am sure, is significantly penetrated.

00:49Possible in the future that India may be the target of a regime change operation.

00:53How do you see Pakistan handling Trump 2.0?

00:56They are willing to sell off their nation piece by piece to the United States,

01:00which is why they have an excellent relationship with the US.

01:03The US case, bribery case against Adani.

01:05Criticism comes from that side that Adani pays to the central government

01:08and gets central projects, airports, ports, everything is being handled to him.

01:13If a foreign country wants to contain you,

01:18it makes sense for them to go after industries or the few corporations

01:22that are aligned with your national interests and are creating infrastructure

01:26and jobs that will bolster your economy

01:28and also bolster national security, interconnectivity and so much more.

01:32Strategic autonomy.

01:33And therefore, it is not surprising

01:35that Adani, etc. have been targeted in whatever way they have been.

01:39And is this all organic?

01:42It definitely is not organic.

01:44Russia seems to be a great friend.

01:45They have helped us in all the wars.

01:47They have supplied us weapons and ammunition.

01:49But they are still giving jet engines to Pakistan.

01:52Russia is selling a few jet engines to Pakistan.

01:55If there is a war, they will be on India's side.

01:58They might not come to fight for us,

01:59but they will not be on the side of Pakistan.

02:09Hello and welcome to ANI Interviews.

02:11I am Naman Yadav.

02:12Right now with me is Abhijit Chavada, sir.

02:14He is a geopolitical analyst, author, writer, podcaster.

02:18He wears a lot of hats.

02:19We will be having a conversation around Trump, Modi, wars,

02:23everything under the sun.

02:25Sir, I will start with the latest.

02:26The Prime Minister is not going to be meeting Trump

02:28in the ASEAN Summit.

02:29He will be attending it virtually.

02:31How do you see it?

02:32Do you see India-US ties will be facing a lot of trouble

02:36till Trump sits at the helm in the United States?

02:40Trump's coming to power has been an inflection point

02:42in global geopolitics and of course for India-US relations.

02:46So India-US relations the past decade, two decades,

02:48have been characterized by what they call a strategic alignment.

02:51That India and the US are on the same boat

02:53and we have essentially a common threat, common adversary

02:56which we face very clearly at home, which is China.

03:00China's hegemonic aspirations, China's expansionism,

03:04its expansionist activities, China's support for Pakistan

03:07and so much more.

03:08So it made sense for India and US to be aligned together.

03:12But the past decade or so, India has kind of transformed itself

03:16economically and in other domains.

03:17And the US now seems to be regarding India

03:20as a potential adversary maybe in a 20-year horizon.

03:26See, right now India is a 4 point something,

03:28whatever the number is, trillion dollar economy.

03:31In the future, when we become a 10 or 15 trillion dollar economy,

03:35they expect that India will be a totally different kind of beast

03:39because with size comes strength

03:41and different aspirations, different ambitions.

03:43So they don't want to see in the future

03:46a new challenger rising on the horizon

03:48just like China currently is a challenger

03:50which the US itself aided and abetted in its rise, right?

03:54So the US now seems to have changed its policy towards India

03:57from a policy of cooperation to a policy of containment.

04:03What signs and symptoms do we see of containment?

04:06They have effected a regime change first of all in Pakistan

04:08in the year 2022, the ouster of Imran Khan

04:11and the installation of Shahbaz Sharif

04:15who is completely pro-US

04:17and also the US, the way it's aligning with Pakistan right now.

04:21Secondly, you had a regime change in Bangladesh

04:23in the year 2024, the ouster of Sheikh Hasina

04:26who was very favorably inclined towards subcontinental integration

04:29especially with India

04:30and now you have the installation of Mohammed Yunus

04:32who is very anti-India.

04:35So we see all of that.

04:36We see also the regime change that happened in Nepal

04:38so we are seeing India being encircled

04:41we talk about the Chinese string of pearls

04:43but we also have this ring of thorns

04:45that is being constructed around us.

04:47So the US is now treating India as a future adversary

04:50and even right now the relationship is becoming

04:52more adversarial in nature

04:53and Mr. Trump who we are talking about

04:56he has this proclivity for making all kinds of statements

04:59that are designed to pressurize the target

05:02so he'll say that India has committed to doing this

05:05India, Mr. Modi has promised that he will do this

05:07when no such thing has happened

05:08and by doing this it has a two-fold effect.

05:13First of all, it dares you, it challenges you

05:17to claim that Mr. Trump is lying

05:19and if you do that

05:20he's going to hold it against you

05:22and he's going to be even more

05:23he's going to impose more pressure on you

05:25maybe more trade restrictions, tariffs, whatever.

05:27So Mr. Trump keeps on doing this

05:29and if Mr. Modi meets Trump

05:32Mr. Trump is going to make all kinds of claims

05:35about what Mr. Modi may or may not have said

05:37and that's going to be a problem for us.

05:39So it makes sense for Mr. Modi

05:41to not meet Mr. Trump

05:43at this point in time

05:44and that's essentially how I see

05:47what has happened.

05:49That Mr. Trump, Mr. Modi is most likely

05:50not going to be going to the ASEAN summit

05:53he's going to participate virtually

05:54and there's going to be no

05:56Trump-Modi meeting

05:57and yeah, I think it makes sense.

06:00You briefly spoke about

06:01how governments are being toppled in Asia

06:02we have example of Sri Lanka, Pakistan,

06:05Bangladesh, Nepal

06:06do you think is there a sort of

06:09any sort of US deep state at work

06:11in India to destabilize

06:12the current government or current regime?

06:15Look, first of all, we have to understand

06:17or define what deep state means.

06:20Okay, there are multiple definitions

06:22of what deep state is.

06:23If you ask Mr. Trump

06:24he's going to have a certain

06:26definition of deep state.

06:27If you ask other entities

06:29outside of the US

06:29they will have a different

06:30definition of deep state.

06:31When Mr. Trump came to power

06:33he fired lots of bureaucrats

06:36and he said that he's cleaning out

06:38the deep state, right?

06:39He's draining the swamp and so on.

06:41So according to Mr. Trump

06:42deep state means

06:43the unaccountable bureaucrats

06:45who serve lifelong positions

06:47in the US establishment

06:48maybe the Pentagon

06:49maybe other departments and so on.

06:51So that is Mr. Trump's definition of deep state.

06:53The unaccountable bureaucracy.

06:55Let's trim that down

06:56and the deep state is taken care of.

06:58From a different perspective

06:59deep state means

07:00or could mean

07:01it comes from a Turkish word

07:03Daulat something

07:04I forget the full term

07:05but it comes from

07:07the meaning is

07:08that there exists apparently

07:10allegedly

07:10an unaccountable

07:13extra constitutional

07:14extra democratic

07:15extra electoral

07:16extra government

07:17center of power

07:17in the US

07:19or maybe outside the US

07:20that controls that nation.

07:22So it is something

07:24that is outside of the government

07:25so the people can't affect it.

07:26They can't vote

07:27that sort of thing

07:28out of power.

07:28If you don't like the president

07:29you can vote him out

07:30but if there's a deep state

07:31that is super presidential

07:33that even controls

07:34your presidents

07:34then what will you do?

07:36Does it exist?

07:37Does it not exist?

07:37Well, most academics

07:39would give you the consensus

07:41that it is a

07:42controversy theory, right?

07:45But maybe it does exist

07:46because you can see

07:47signs and symptoms of that.

07:49Sometimes US presidents

07:50who don't align

07:51with certain objectives

07:52or initiatives

07:53they are either 1963

07:56like Kennedy

07:57or maybe something

07:58like that 2020 happens

08:00when Trump claims

08:01that the election

08:01was stolen from him.

08:02So clearly there are powers

08:03that are clearly

08:05more powerful

08:06than the US president.

08:07The Federal Reserve

08:08Bank of the United States,

08:10right?

08:11Who owns it?

08:12Does the US government

08:13own it?

08:14The US government

08:15doesn't own it.

08:16They will say that

08:17it has shareholders,

08:19stakeholders

08:19who are distributed

08:20among various other banks

08:21in the US

08:22and so on and so forth

08:23but that's very muddy.

08:24It's very muddled

08:25and it's essentially

08:26a private bank

08:27that essentially controls

08:29and owns the US economy

08:30which means the US

08:32is owned by somebody

08:33who we don't know.

08:34Maybe a small group of people

08:35maybe a larger group of people.

08:36There have been various

08:37business people who have said

08:38that there exists maybe

08:40for example

08:41the Sri Lankan-born

08:42American entrepreneur

08:43Chamath Paliha Pitya.

08:45He once said

08:45and I'm sure that he regrets

08:46saying it

08:47that it's a small group

08:49of maybe 150 men

08:50who control the entire world

08:52and all the global finances

08:54and by extension

08:55the global

08:56geopolitics all over.

08:58So clearly something like this

09:00does exist.

09:01A deep state.

09:02Now the question you asked

09:03is about India.

09:04Does the deep state

09:05seek to undermine India

09:07or maybe do a regime change

09:09operation in India?

09:10So we know that there is

09:12something called

09:12the color revolution model.

09:14That template has been used

09:15over and over again.

09:16You could see the first signs

09:18and symptoms of that

09:18in Central Asia

09:19and Kyrgyzstan etc.

09:20in the early 2000s

09:22and then you had

09:23the Arab Spring

09:25which followed the same template

09:26and then you have

09:27other color revolutions

09:28that happen over and over again

09:29and you had

09:30in the 20th century

09:31also different versions

09:33of that

09:33in various African countries

09:35where dictators

09:36were installed

09:36and they would

09:38undermine their country

09:39they would make their country

09:41subservient

09:42to foreign powers

09:43typically the western powers

09:44and so on.

09:45So it clearly

09:46this model

09:47the color revolution template

09:48does exist.

09:49Now

09:49how do you execute

09:50a color revolution?

09:51You don't just put

09:52switch on

09:53you know

09:53press a switch

09:54and the color revolution

09:55executes itself

09:55you need to have assets

09:57on the ground

09:58in the target country

09:59you need to have

10:01funding networks

10:02you need to cultivate

10:03individuals

10:03in the target country

10:05what kind of individuals

10:06do you cultivate?

10:07You cultivate

10:08business people

10:09you cultivate

10:10you can cultivate

10:11politicians

10:12future political leaders

10:13or existing political leaders

10:15you can cultivate

10:16media outlets

10:18you can cultivate

10:18journalists

10:19academics

10:20teachers

10:21and so much more

10:22so influencers

10:24these are the tools

10:25that a foreign government

10:26can use to destabilize

10:27any other government

10:28outside of the country

10:29journalists

10:30media

10:30and social media platforms

10:32what else

10:33any government

10:34can use to destabilize

10:35government?

10:36Right

10:36so by doing all of this

10:38you can create

10:38so what are the means

10:39of destabilization

10:40is what you're asking

10:41there are

10:42it's called hybrid warfare

10:43which is a very big

10:44umbrella term

10:45which contains

10:47lots of different

10:48tools in the toolkit

10:49one of the tools

10:51in the toolkit

10:51is a manipulation

10:53of narratives

10:54disinformation campaigns

10:56so what you do

10:57is that if you have

10:58in a country

10:59in the target country

11:00let's say

11:01multiple compromised

11:02media assets

11:02who you are funding

11:03then

11:04I'm sure that

11:06all the media outlets

11:07in the country

11:07won't be compromised

11:08but some may be compromised

11:09so you use those

11:11to propagate

11:12certain narratives

11:13which erode

11:15the credibility

11:16of the government

11:17which sow discord

11:18in the country

11:19and contribute

11:20to chaos

11:21in the country

11:21they demoralize

11:22the country

11:23right

11:23that's one thing

11:24you do

11:24you use influencers

11:26who may be located

11:27within the country

11:28maybe outside the country

11:29and these individuals

11:31they read scripts

11:32looking at the camera

11:33there's a teleprompter

11:34there

11:34the viewer doesn't know it

11:35and they continuously

11:37bombard the narrative

11:38that the government

11:38is ineffective

11:39and so on

11:40that's one thing

11:40okay

11:41that's the disinformation

11:42campaigns

11:42another thing you can do

11:44is to cultivate

11:46individuals

11:47who are not in the media

11:48for example

11:49politicians

11:50for example

11:51academics

11:52for example

11:52people who run NGOs

11:54how do you cultivate them

11:56you can appeal to

11:57one of two things

11:57one is their personal ambitions

11:59their personal agendas

12:01maybe the personal greed

12:02which means you fund them

12:03another thing is

12:04you target their weaknesses

12:06you blackmail them

12:08if you have anything on them

12:09and it's not difficult

12:10to blackmail people

12:11if you know

12:11what their weaknesses are

12:12so by doing that

12:14you cultivate targets

12:16you cultivate assets

12:17that you can use

12:18on demand

12:19then you can obviously

12:20use other kinds of threats

12:23one is tariffs

12:24one is sanctions

12:25in case you are a powerful country

12:28that controls supply chains

12:29trade networks

12:30then you can create problems

12:33for the target country

12:34by cutting off supply chains

12:36maybe you control

12:37a network of ports

12:38in the region

12:39and that country

12:40is dependent on

12:41various kinds of imports

12:42so you block those imports

12:43you create delays

12:44you know

12:45very painful delays

12:46that's how you can

12:48destroy the country's economy

12:49and once again

12:50make the government

12:51look weak

12:52right

12:52then you can also do

12:54you can do

12:55cyber attacks

12:56you can disrupt

12:58the telecommunications sector

13:00you can disrupt

13:00the energy grid

13:01you can disrupt

13:02the stock market

13:04all of this

13:04once again

13:05makes the government

13:06look bad

13:06it looks like

13:07the government

13:07has lost control

13:08of the country

13:08when actually

13:09the attacks are coming

13:10from outside

13:11you can disrupt

13:13the

13:14in case you control

13:15countries

13:16that are energy exporters

13:18maybe oil exporters

13:19maybe oil and gas exporters

13:20then you can arm twist

13:22those countries

13:23into delaying shipments

13:24of oil

13:24or energy

13:26to the target country

13:27which can create chaos

13:28in the country

13:29right

13:29you can do

13:31you can support

13:32separatist movements

13:33in the country

13:33you can support

13:34you can fund

13:35and finance countries

13:36that are

13:37that are using terrorism

13:39against that country

13:40the toolkit

13:41can go on and on

13:42if you look at facebook

13:43if you look at youtube

13:45if you look at all the social media giants

13:47and all the apps

13:48nothing is being controlled by india

13:49the data is not stored in india

13:51they do not comply

13:52with indian it regulations

13:54should we have our own

13:56made in india app

13:57like zoho's messaging app

13:59has come up now

14:00do you think

14:01how can government support such apps

14:02and support such startups

14:04and should we follow china's rule

14:06and outrightly ban

14:08every single app

14:08right

14:09so this is a very major issue

14:10like you rightly say

14:11all these platforms

14:13whether it is facebook

14:15whether it is youtube

14:16whether it is gmail

14:18whether it is twitter

14:19or x

14:19snapchat

14:20instagram

14:21whatever you call it

14:22all the means

14:24that we indians use

14:26to communicate

14:27among ourselves

14:28these are all owned

14:30by foreign

14:31foreign powers

14:32see

14:32social media became a thing

14:34in the early 2000s

14:35mid 2000s

14:36orkut became a thing

14:37people don't even remember

14:38orkut

14:38orkut was owned by google

14:39orkut for the first time

14:41brought indians together

14:42maybe for the first time

14:43first time

14:44in a millennium

14:45in a thousand years

14:46indians could communicate

14:47with each other in real time

14:48and then you had facebook

14:49coming up

14:50then you had youtube

14:51you had twitter

14:52and so on

14:53and today indians take it

14:54for granted

14:54that we can communicate

14:55in real time

14:56with anybody

14:57across the country

14:58even people we don't know

14:59we can right now

15:00see a snapshot

15:01of what's happening

15:02in assam

15:03what's happening

15:04in kerala

15:04what's happening

15:05in other parts of india

15:06this is something

15:07we take for granted

15:08but this is also

15:10weaponized

15:10for spreading narratives

15:12for creating misinformation

15:13and so much more

15:14so this tool

15:16that is vital to us

15:18it's controlled

15:18by foreign governments

15:19and they can weaponize

15:20it in any way

15:21they can trend

15:22certain sentiments

15:23earlier used to have

15:25hashtag trending

15:25today we can

15:26trend other sentiments

15:27you can

15:28there are other nations

15:29that can you know

15:30create these bot farms

15:31you know

15:32in case you've not seen

15:34there were videos

15:35that came out

15:36that various pakistani groups

15:37and chinese groups

15:38they have these racks

15:39like you have bookshelves

15:41similarly they have racks

15:42filled with mobile phones

15:43all connected to the internet

15:44and each of these

15:45through ai

15:46is impersonating

15:48a twitter account

15:48or something

15:49and they are all

15:50you know

15:50mass producing narratives

15:52and you will have seen

15:53that after 2022

15:54after february 22

15:55there's been this

15:56outpouring of negative

15:58sentiment towards

15:59india on social media

16:00a lot of indophobia

16:01a lot of hindophobia

16:02a lot of anti-india

16:03sentiment

16:04disparaging india

16:05tottering india

16:06so and so

16:06all of that has

16:07suddenly surged

16:09after 2022

16:10and right now

16:11we are at the peak

16:12of that

16:12much of this

16:13could potentially

16:14be done

16:15by actors

16:17or nations

16:18that are inimical

16:19to our interests

16:20maybe pakistan

16:21maybe china

16:21maybe even

16:22somewhere in the west

16:23it could be happening

16:24so this is a very

16:25major problem

16:26and let's say

16:27in the future

16:27the west decides

16:28to cut off access

16:29to india

16:29then what do we do

16:30we're suddenly

16:30rudderless

16:31we can't communicate

16:32with each other

16:32so it is critical

16:34and i have been

16:35trying to highlight

16:35this for at least

16:36a decade

16:37that india needs

16:38to have its own

16:39social media

16:40platforms

16:40right

16:41but is it enough

16:42to just have

16:43social media platforms

16:44we had something

16:44like something

16:44called coup

16:45in the past

16:46coup was an

16:47indian version

16:48of twitter

16:48a substandard

16:49version of twitter

16:50i saw your expression

16:50it didn't work well

16:51it didn't work

16:52it was a terrible

16:53user experience

16:54terrible

16:55it was painful

16:56to use coup

16:57when you already

16:58are using twitter

16:58so we not only

17:01need to have

17:02our own social

17:02media apps

17:03but those should

17:04be world class

17:05we should not

17:07take shortcuts

17:08and the

17:08chalta hai attitude

17:09and produce

17:09substandard apps

17:10and then complain

17:11when indians

17:11don't adopt it

17:12indians will adopt

17:14an app only

17:14if it is world

17:15class where it

17:15provides a similar

17:17experience to

17:18existing apps

17:18if not a better

17:19experience

17:20then indians

17:21will adopt

17:21it

17:22so indian

17:22entrepreneurs

17:23need to take

17:24up this challenge

17:24right

17:25to create

17:26these apps

17:26and the indian

17:27government needs

17:27to clear the

17:28way for them

17:29to do this

17:29by creating

17:31a conducive

17:31business

17:32environment

17:33so that's

17:34what needs

17:34to happen

17:34it's very

17:35important

17:36it's critical

17:36our data

17:38is being

17:39harvested

17:40by the west

17:40by whoever

17:41is controlling

17:42these platforms

17:44tremendous amount

17:45see indians

17:46are some of

17:47the biggest

17:47users on

17:48facebook

17:48on twitter

17:49on youtube

17:50wherever else

17:51and other

17:52data

17:52freely

17:53accessible

17:53and harvested

17:54by the west

17:54and then

17:55that creates

17:56all kinds of

17:58social engineering

17:58scenarios

17:59because of that

17:59so it's very

18:01important

18:02it's vital

18:02it's critical

18:03for india

18:03at some point

18:05in time

18:05hopefully sooner

18:06rather than

18:06later

18:06to create

18:07its own

18:08apps

18:08should we

18:09emulate the

18:09chinese

18:10like you asked

18:10and create

18:11a walled

18:12garden

18:12maybe a great

18:14firewall of india

18:15like the chinese

18:15of the great

18:15firewall of china

18:16it's perhaps

18:19unfeasible

18:20because indians

18:21travel across

18:22the world

18:23and if we

18:23are ring

18:23fenced

18:24then we

18:24cannot

18:24communicate

18:25with people

18:25who are

18:26outside of

18:26india

18:26it will be

18:28portrayed as

18:29undemocratic

18:29and it will

18:30not

18:30you know

18:31it will

18:32create an

18:32echo chamber

18:33within india

18:33so ideally

18:35we should have

18:35our own

18:35platforms

18:36it is probably

18:37not feasible

18:37to create

18:38a great

18:39firewall

18:39and cut

18:40off india's

18:40access to

18:41the western

18:41internet

18:42and create

18:42a ring

18:43fenced

18:43version

18:43of an

18:44intranet

18:44kind of

18:45thing

18:45maybe it's

18:46not that

18:46feasible

18:46maybe not

18:48that practical

18:48there's too

18:49much penetration

18:49already

18:49and so on

18:50let me shift

18:51gears and ask

18:52you about

18:52pakistan

18:53how do you

18:54see

18:54pakistan

18:56handling

18:56trump 2.0

18:57asimoneer

18:58had met

18:59trump

18:59a couple

18:59of times

19:00in the last

19:00three or

19:01four months

19:01shaibas

19:02harif

19:02also met

19:02trump

19:03a couple

19:03of times

19:04they seem

19:04to be

19:05having

19:05a good

19:05ties

19:05you know

19:06rare earth

19:06minerals

19:07crypto

19:07the business

19:08seem to be

19:09doing well

19:09how do you

19:10see their

19:10relationship

19:10and should

19:11india

19:11be worried

19:12at all

19:12india

19:13should be

19:13very worried

19:13first of

19:14all

19:14right

19:14why should

19:15be worried

19:15why should

19:16we be

19:16worried

19:16see pakistan

19:17and india

19:18we are

19:18very different

19:18nations

19:19pakistan is

19:20a mercenary

19:21nation

19:21india is

19:23a genuine

19:23vibrant

19:24democracy

19:24with hundreds

19:25of political

19:25parties

19:26in complete

19:27chaos

19:27every five

19:28years

19:28when you

19:28have

19:28elections

19:28and

19:29tremendous

19:30uncertainty

19:30as to

19:30what will

19:31happen

19:31every five

19:31years

19:32that's

19:32a real

19:33democracy

19:33which is

19:33actually

19:34perhaps

19:34a problem

19:35for

19:35india

19:35pakistan

19:37ever since

19:38its inception

19:38essentially

19:39since its

19:40inception

19:40short time

19:41after its inception

19:42became a nation

19:43that was ruled

19:43by the military

19:44and in pakistan

19:46you have the

19:46semblance

19:47of some kind

19:47of democracy

19:48you have prime

19:48ministers

19:48who come

19:49and go

19:49but the real

19:50power always

19:51resides in the

19:52hands of the

19:52armed forces

19:53the military

19:54of pakistan

19:55so even

19:57when you have

19:57a prime

19:57minister

19:58who is

19:58on paper

20:01ruling the

20:01country

20:02you actually

20:02have the

20:03military

20:03that calls

20:03the shots

20:04and the prime

20:04minister

20:04can't do

20:05a thing

20:06that goes

20:06against the

20:07military

20:07otherwise

20:08you end

20:08up with

20:08someone

20:09like

20:09Mr. Bhutto

20:11who was

20:11hanged

20:11by Ziaul

20:12Haq

20:12and other

20:13instances

20:13also

20:14not that

20:14bad

20:15but similar

20:15so

20:17Pakistan's

20:17military

20:18what is

20:18its agenda

20:19its agenda

20:20is to

20:21stay in

20:21power

20:21in Pakistan

20:22as long

20:23as possible

20:24right

20:24how do you

20:25stay in

20:25power

20:26with the

20:26support

20:27of

20:27foreign

20:28governments

20:28they always

20:29play the

20:31role

20:31of

20:32making

20:33their nation

20:34subsidiary

20:35to a

20:35foreign

20:35agenda

20:35so that

20:36they can

20:36keep on

20:37receiving

20:37the

20:37paychecks

20:38and they

20:38can

20:39stay

20:39in

20:39power

20:40so

20:41Pakistan

20:42for the

20:42longest

20:42time

20:43and even

20:44now

20:44it

20:44conducts

20:45terrorist

20:45operations

20:46against

20:46India

20:46it's

20:48not a

20:49secret

20:49that the

20:50US

20:50funded

20:50and

20:50financed

20:51Pakistani

20:52terrorism

20:52against

20:52India

20:53essentially

20:54since

20:55immediately

20:55after

20:56Christmas

20:56day

20:561979

20:58which is

21:00the

21:01Soviet

21:01invasion

21:01of

21:01Afghanistan

21:02so

21:03that's

21:03when

21:03Pakistan

21:03became

21:04important

21:04Pakistan

21:05was

21:06created

21:06as a

21:07western

21:08outpost

21:09in the

21:09Indian

21:09subcontinent

21:09to cut

21:10off

21:11India's

21:11access

21:11to

21:11Central

21:12Asia

21:12and

21:12Europe

21:12our

21:13traditional

21:13land

21:14access

21:14and to

21:15create

21:15a

21:15permanent

21:16challenge

21:17to

21:17India

21:17something

21:17that

21:18can

21:18keep

21:18on

21:18bleeding

21:19India

21:19whenever

21:20required

21:20and

21:20keep

21:21India

21:21permanently

21:21off

21:22balance

21:22and

21:22now

21:23they

21:23have

21:23given

21:23them

21:23nuclear

21:23weapons

21:24I

21:24don't

21:24believe

21:24for

21:25one

21:25instance

21:25the

21:25Pakistani

21:26scientists

21:26are

21:26capable

21:27of

21:27developing

21:27nuclear

21:28weapons

21:28on

21:28their

21:28own

21:28they

21:29most

21:29likely

21:29have

21:36Pakistan

21:36does

21:37is

21:37that

21:37it

21:38acts

21:39as

21:39a

21:39western

21:40mercenary

21:40and

21:41the

21:41objective

21:41is

21:42to

21:42target

21:43India

21:43for

21:44a

21:44decade

21:44or

21:44so

21:44between

21:452012

21:46to

21:462022

21:47Pakistan

21:48lost

21:49the US

21:49favor

21:49so

21:50it

21:50courted

21:50China

21:51in

21:5122

21:52you

21:52had

21:52a

21:52military

21:53coup

21:53in

21:54Pakistan

21:54and

21:55it's

21:55again

21:56a

21:56vassal

21:57of

21:57the

21:57United

21:57States

21:58so

21:59Trump

21:59what

22:00does

22:00Trump

22:00seek

22:01Trump

22:01seeks

22:01to

22:01encircle

22:02India

22:03Trump

22:03seeks

22:03to

22:03contain

22:04India

22:04one

22:04of

22:05the

22:05best

22:05ways

22:05of

22:05doing

22:05it

22:05is

22:06to

22:06once

22:06again

22:07activate

22:07Pakistan

22:07so

22:08Trump

22:09has

22:09business

22:09interests

22:10of

22:10his

22:10own

22:10besides

22:11being

22:11a

22:11president

22:11he

22:11has

22:11a

22:12business

22:12empire

22:12and

22:12they

22:13are

22:13going

22:13full

22:14scale

22:14into

22:14crypto

22:15and

22:16it

22:16is

22:16very

22:17it's

22:17a

22:17coincidence

22:18apparently

22:18that

22:18Pakistani

22:19crypto

22:19sector

22:20also

22:20came

22:20up

22:20just

22:21after

22:21Trump

22:22showed

22:22interest

22:22in

22:23cryptocurrency

22:23there

22:24is

22:25that

22:25then

22:25Pakistan

22:26will

22:26be

22:26selling

22:27its

22:27oil

22:27and

22:27gas

22:28to

22:28the

22:28United

22:28States

22:29to

22:29Donald

22:30Trump

22:30because

22:30Trump's

22:31business

22:31empire

22:32will be

22:32investing

22:32in

22:32the

22:32oil

22:33and

22:33gas

22:33sector

22:33in

22:34Pakistan

22:34so

22:35whatever

22:35reserves

22:36they

22:36have

22:36they

22:36will

22:36sell

22:37them

22:38to

22:38the

22:38Americans

22:38at

22:38very

22:39good

22:39prices

22:39obviously

22:39then

22:40they

22:40have

22:40some

22:41reserves

22:41of

22:41rare

22:42earths

22:42and

22:42minerals

22:42and

22:43so

22:43on

22:43that

22:43also

22:44is

22:44all

22:44available

22:45when

22:45Mr.

22:45Asin

22:45Moolid

22:45went

22:46to

22:46the

22:47White

22:47House

22:47he

22:47came

22:48with

22:48a

22:48crate

22:50full

22:50of

22:50these

22:51fantastic

22:51goodies

22:52that

22:52Trump

22:52was

22:52very

22:52pleased

22:53to

22:53see

22:53so

22:54they

22:54are

22:54willing

22:54to

22:55sell

22:55off

22:55their

22:55nation

22:56piece

22:56by

22:56piece

22:56to

22:57the

22:57United

22:57States

22:57which

22:58is

22:58why

22:58they

22:58have

22:58an

22:58excellent

22:59relationship

22:59with

22:59the

23:00US

23:00so

23:00there

23:01will

23:01be

23:01commentators

23:01in

23:01India

23:01saying

23:02that

23:02look

23:02India

23:03is

23:03doing

23:04such

23:04a

23:04bad

23:04job

23:04of

23:04dealing

23:05with

23:05the

23:05US

23:05look

23:06at

23:06Pakistan

23:06look

23:07how

23:07favorably

23:07the

23:08US

23:08treats

23:08Pakistan

23:09well

23:09the

23:10US

23:10has

23:10certain

23:10conditions

23:11they

23:11will

23:11treat

23:12you

23:12favorably

23:12as

23:12long

23:13as

23:13you

23:13sell

23:13your

23:13country

23:14off

23:14piece

23:14by

23:14piece

23:15can

23:16we

23:16do

23:16that

23:16can

23:16we

23:16afford

23:17to

23:17do

23:17that

23:17we

23:17are

23:18a

23:18sovereign

23:18nation

23:18we

23:19are

23:19one

23:19of

23:19the

23:19five

23:20sovereign

23:20nations

23:20on

23:21the

23:21face

23:21of

23:21the

23:21planet

23:21and

23:22we

23:22cannot

23:22lose

23:23our

23:23sovereignty

23:24we

23:24can't

23:25compromise

23:25our

23:26strategic

23:26autonomy

23:26and

23:27that's

23:27why

23:28India

23:28is

23:29right

23:29now

23:29on

23:29the

23:30receiving

23:30end

23:30while

23:30Pakistan

23:31is

23:31receiving

23:32all

23:41when

23:42did

23:42it

23:43happen

23:44that

23:44the

23:44leader

23:45of

23:45a

23:46nation's

23:46military

23:46was

23:47received

23:48by

23:49Donald

23:49Trump

23:49in

23:49the

23:50Oval

23:50office

23:50I

23:51can't

23:52remember

23:52the

23:52last

23:52time

23:52that

23:52happened

23:53as

23:53if

23:53he

23:53is

23:53a

23:53head

23:53of

23:53state

23:54and

23:54Shahbaz

23:54Sharif

23:55is

23:55like

23:55a

23:55minion

23:56so

23:57that's

23:57the

23:57deal

23:57Pakistan

23:58is

23:58doing

23:58a

23:58good

23:58job

23:59because

23:59it's

23:59willing

23:59to

23:59sell

23:59its

23:59country

24:00and

24:00its

24:00resources

24:01it's

24:02willing

24:02to

24:02prioritize

24:03foreign

24:04interests

24:04over

24:04the

24:11of

24:11frequent

24:12strings

24:12of

24:13attack

24:13against

24:13Indian

24:14businessmen

24:14Adani

24:15and

24:15Ambani

24:15and

24:16all

24:16the

24:16big

24:16businessmen

24:17are

24:17being

24:17attacked

24:18it's

24:18a

24:18natural

24:18or

24:18organic

24:19criticism

24:20or

24:20do

24:20you

24:20think

24:20something

24:21there

24:21is

24:21something

24:22larger

24:22perspective

24:23here

24:23or

24:23something

24:24that

24:24meets

24:24more

24:25than

24:25the

24:25eye

24:25look

24:27for

24:27any

24:28country

24:28to

24:28do

24:28well

24:28you

24:29need

24:29private

24:30commercial

24:31activities

24:32to

24:32take

24:32the

24:33forefront

24:33the

24:34government

24:34the

24:35state

24:35cannot

24:36be

24:36expected

24:37to

24:37take

24:38care

24:38of

24:38all

24:38sectors

24:39and

24:39do

24:39development

24:39in

24:40all

24:40sectors

24:40you

24:41know

24:41you

24:41have

24:41the

24:41state

24:42backed

24:42enterprises

24:44public

24:45sector

24:45organizations

24:45you

24:46know

24:46PSUs

24:47and

24:47so on

24:47that

24:48typically

24:48in the

24:49socialist

24:50past

24:51of

24:51India

24:51used

24:52to

24:52take

24:52care

24:52of

24:52all

24:52the

24:52sectors

24:53coal

24:53mining

24:53this

24:54that

24:54electricity

24:54everything

24:55but

24:56when

24:56you

24:56are

24:57a

24:57government

24:57entity

24:57it's

24:59not

24:59your

24:59money

25:00that

25:00is

25:00at

25:00stake

25:00so

25:01you

25:01don't

25:01have

25:01that

25:01urgency

25:02for

25:03business

25:03efficiency

25:04and

25:04so

25:04on

25:04and

25:04that's

25:05why

25:05it's

25:05very

25:05important

25:05for

25:05the

25:06private

25:06sector

25:06to

25:07become

25:07Atmanirbhar

25:08for

25:08Atmanirbhar

25:08Bharat

25:09and

25:10the

25:10private

25:10sector

25:11you

25:11know

25:11it

25:12typically

25:12is

25:12far

25:13more

25:13efficient

25:13in

25:14doing

25:14business

25:14than

25:15the

25:15public

25:15sector

25:16and

25:16it

25:17has

25:18the

25:18potential

25:18to

25:18give

25:19tremendous

25:19numbers

25:20of

25:20jobs

25:20to

25:20people

25:20to

25:21create

25:21infrastructure

25:21to

25:22create

25:22interconnectivity

25:23and

25:23so

25:23much

25:23more

25:23so

25:24it

25:25therefore

25:26if

25:26a

25:27foreign

25:27country

25:27wants

25:29to

25:29contain

25:30you

25:30it

25:31makes

25:34industries

25:36or

25:36the

25:36few

25:37corporations

25:37that

25:38are

25:38aligned

25:39with

25:39your

25:39national

25:39interest

25:40and

25:40are

25:40creating

25:40infrastructure

25:41and

25:42jobs

25:42that

25:43will

25:43bolster

25:43your

25:43economy

25:44and

25:44also

25:44bolster

25:45national

25:45security

25:46interconnectivity

25:47and

25:47so

25:47much

25:47more

25:48strategic

25:48autonomy

25:48and

25:49therefore

25:49it

25:50is

25:50not

25:50surprising

25:51that

25:51Adani

25:51etc

25:52have

25:52been

25:52targeted

25:53in

25:53whatever

25:53way

25:53they

25:54have

25:54been

25:54and

25:55is

25:55this

25:55all

25:56organic

25:56it

25:58definitely

25:58is

25:58not

25:59organic

25:59right

25:59because

26:00otherwise

26:00they

26:00would

26:01target

26:01other

26:01industries

26:01also

26:02why

26:02is

26:02Tata

26:03not

26:03targeted

26:03for

26:03example

26:04Tata

26:04sells

26:05automobiles

26:05Tata

26:06does

26:06other

26:06things

26:06as

26:06well

26:06why

26:07are

26:07the

26:08Tata

26:08group

26:08not

26:09targeted

26:09why

26:10are

26:11certain

26:11other

26:11businesses

26:12not

26:12targeted

26:12why

26:12are

26:12Birla

26:13Mahindra

26:13etc

26:14not

26:14targeted

26:14but

26:15only

26:15some

26:15of

26:15them

26:15are

26:15targeted

26:16it's

26:16because

26:17they

26:17are

26:17aligned

26:17with

26:18India

26:18national

26:18interest

26:19in

26:20which

26:20we

26:20can

26:20discuss

26:21in

26:21detail

26:21so

26:21it's

26:22definitely

26:22not

26:22organic

26:23you

26:23will

26:23have

26:23lots

26:23of

26:24influencers

26:25in

26:25India

26:25targeting

26:26for

26:26example

26:27Adani

26:27etc

26:30they

26:30create

26:30the

26:31narrative

26:31you

26:32will

26:32have

26:32lots

26:32of

26:32journalists

26:33and

26:34media

26:35outlets

26:35targeting

26:36these

26:36entities

26:37you

26:37will

26:38have

26:38academics

26:39targeting

26:40them

26:40you

26:40will

26:40have

26:41potentially

26:41perhaps

26:42some

26:42politicians

26:42in

26:42India

26:43targeting

26:43them

26:43it's

26:45definitely

26:45not

26:46organic

26:46it

26:47is

26:47all

26:47orchestrated

26:48it

26:48is

26:48all

26:48definitely

26:49coordinated

26:50in

26:50order

26:50to

26:51erode

26:52the

26:52public's

26:53trust

26:53in

26:54these

26:55commercial

26:56ventures

26:57and

26:57corporations

26:58that are

26:59aligned with

27:00the

27:00national

27:00interest

27:00and

27:01how do

27:01you

27:01see

27:01USA

27:01case

27:02bribery

27:02case

27:02against

27:03Adani

27:03the

27:04Adani

27:04group

27:04has

27:04called

27:05all

27:05the

27:05allegations

27:05against

27:06them

27:06baseless

27:07but

27:07it

27:08seems

27:08to

27:08be

27:08sticking

27:09with

27:09some

27:09of

27:09the

27:10population

27:10of

27:10India

27:11and

27:11you

27:11know

27:12criticism

27:12comes

27:13from

27:13that

27:13side

27:14that

27:14Adani

27:14pays

27:14to

27:14the

27:15central

27:15government

27:15and

27:15get

27:16central

27:16projects

27:17airports

27:17sports

27:18everything

27:18is

27:19being

27:19handled

27:19to

27:23case

27:24in

27:24detail

27:24there

27:25have

27:25been

27:25allegations

27:25against

27:26the

27:26Adani

27:26group

27:26right

27:27there

27:27was

27:27the

27:28Hindenburg

27:28allegations

27:28I think

27:29it was

27:29in early

27:302023

27:30and

27:31then

27:31there

27:31was

27:31a US

27:32federal

27:33court

27:33that

27:33opened

27:34the

27:35case

27:35against

27:35Adani

27:35sometime

27:36late

27:36in

27:372024

27:37so

27:38the

27:38Hindenburg

27:38group

27:39which

27:40later

27:40disappeared

27:41shut

27:42down

27:42because

27:43their job

27:43was done

27:44apparently

27:44so

27:45their

27:46allegations

27:46were

27:46of

27:46stock

27:47manipulation

27:47crony

27:48capitalism

27:48whatever

27:48that

27:48means

27:49and

27:50the

27:50US

27:50federal

27:50court

27:50has

27:51alleged

27:51that

27:51Adani

27:52group

27:52is

27:52bribing

27:53the

27:53government

27:53of

27:53India

27:53millions

27:54of

27:54dollars

27:54for

27:55whatever

27:56benefits

27:57and so

27:57on

27:57now

27:57let

27:59so

27:59the

27:59security

28:00and

28:00exchanges

28:00board

28:00of

28:01India

28:01has

28:01done

28:02an

28:02investigation

28:02I

28:03think

28:03just

28:03last

28:03month

28:04or

28:04so

28:04they

28:04said

28:05that

28:05none

28:05of

28:05the

28:06allegations

28:06are

28:06apparently

28:09some

28:09other

28:09investigations

28:10are still

28:11ongoing

28:11but

28:11the

28:11clean

28:12treat

28:12has

28:12been

28:12given

28:12after

28:12extensive

28:13investigations

28:14Now

28:15the

28:15question

28:15is

28:15why

28:15is

28:16Adani

28:16in

28:16specific

28:21India

28:21Adani

28:23has

28:23the

28:24Adani

28:24group

28:24has

28:24various

28:25businesses

28:25most

28:26of

28:26the

28:26overwhelming

28:27majority

28:27of

28:28which

28:28are

28:28not

28:28public

28:29facing

28:29right

28:30see

28:31in

28:31case

28:32if

28:32you

28:33ask

28:33the

28:34people

28:34of

28:34India

28:34about

28:34Tata

28:35they

28:35know

28:35Tata

28:35motors

28:36we

28:36buy

28:36car

28:36from

28:37them

28:37so

28:37we

28:37know

28:37what

28:37Tata

28:38does

28:38if

28:39you

28:39think

28:39about

28:39Reliance

28:39Jio

28:40yeah

28:41we

28:41buy

28:41Jio

28:41products

28:41from

28:42Reliance

28:42if

28:43you

28:43think

28:43about

28:43Apple

28:44oh

28:44we

28:44have

28:44a

28:44cell

28:51me

28:51explain

28:51what

28:51Adani

28:52does

28:52okay

28:53Adani

28:54the

28:54Adani

28:54group

28:55is

28:55involved

28:56in

28:56various

28:56sectors

28:56which

28:57are

28:57all

28:57critical

28:57to

28:58India's

28:58national

28:58security

28:59and

28:59geopolitical

29:00stance

29:01and

29:01ambitions

29:02first

29:02of

29:02all

29:02ports

29:03the

29:04Adani

29:05group

29:05operates

29:05at

29:06least

29:0613

29:06ports

29:07on

29:08both

29:08coastlines

29:08of

29:09India

29:09the

29:09east

29:09coast

29:09and

29:09west

29:10coast

29:10and

29:11these

29:11ports

29:11cumulatively

29:12account

29:13for

29:13about

29:13a

29:13quarter

29:14of

29:14India's

29:15cargo

29:15a

29:16quarter

29:17of

29:17India's

29:17cargo

29:17and

29:18because

29:19Adani

29:20group

29:20it's

29:20the

29:20largest

29:20private

29:21port

29:21operator

29:22in

29:22India

29:22and

29:23this

29:24gives

29:24India

29:24tremendous

29:25leverage

29:26it

29:26ensures

29:27that

29:27India's

29:28national

29:28security

29:28maritime

29:29security

29:29is

29:29taken

29:29care

29:30of

29:30it

29:30ensure

29:31that

29:31India

29:31is

29:31integrated

29:32with

29:32various

29:32trade

29:33routes

29:33the

29:34Mundra

29:34port

29:34it

29:35gets

29:36more

29:36than

29:36200

29:37million

29:38metric

29:38tons

29:39every

29:39year

29:39of

29:40cargo

29:40inward

29:41and

29:41out

29:41bound

29:41it

29:42ensures

29:43that

29:43India

29:43is

29:43connected

29:45to

29:45the

29:45West

29:46Asian

29:46Middle

29:46Eastern

29:47markets

29:47and

29:47India

29:48also

29:48has

29:48tremendous

29:49connection

29:50with

29:50the

29:50African

29:51markets

29:51and

29:51African

29:52resources

29:52it

29:53is

29:53vital

29:53for

29:54India's

29:54national

29:54security

29:55the

29:55port

29:55operations

29:56the

29:56Haifa

29:57port

29:57that

29:57Adani

29:57operates

29:58it

29:58is

29:58in

29:59the

29:59northern

29:59part

30:00of

30:00Israel

30:00that

30:01has

30:02ensured

30:02that

30:02there

30:02is

30:03a

30:03strategic

30:04synergy

30:05between

30:05India

30:05and

30:05Israel

30:06it

30:06gives

30:07India

30:07the

30:08ability

30:09to

30:11project

30:12power

30:12beyond

30:13the

30:13Indian

30:13Ocean

30:14region

30:14in

30:14the

30:15Mediterranean

30:15region

30:15the

30:16Eastern

30:16Mediterranean

30:16and

30:16overall

30:17Mediterranean

30:17region

30:18it is

30:20a vital

30:21component

30:21of the

30:21IMEC

30:22India

30:22Middle East

30:23Europe

30:23Economic

30:24Corridor

30:25which is

30:25a vital

30:26challenger

30:27to China's

30:27belt and

30:28road

30:28initiative

30:29right

30:29a vital

30:30alternative to

30:31China's

30:32belt and

30:32road

30:32initiative

30:32without

30:33the

30:33Haifa

30:34port

30:34that Adani

30:34controls

30:35how will

30:35we do

30:36it

30:36the

30:37Adani

30:37group

30:37controls

30:38about

30:3851%

30:39of

30:39the

30:40West

30:40container

30:41terminal

30:42of

30:42the

30:42Colombo

30:43port

30:43which

30:44is

30:44an

30:44incredibly

30:45vital

30:45transshipment

30:47port

30:47that

30:48serves

30:48the

30:48entire

30:48Indian

30:49subcontinent

30:49not

30:50just

30:50India

30:50but

30:50Pakistan

30:51Bangladesh

30:51etc

30:51and

30:52this

30:53is

30:53a

30:53direct

30:53alternative

30:54to

30:54the

30:55Chinese

30:55investments

30:56and

30:56the

30:56Chinese

30:57acquisitions

30:57of

30:57other

30:58container

30:58terminals

30:58in

30:59the

30:59same

30:59port

30:59imagine

31:00China

31:00controls

31:01the

31:01entire

31:01ports

31:02or

31:02the

31:02terminals

31:02they

31:03can

31:03deny

31:03access

31:03to

31:06whenever

31:06required

31:07right

31:08so

31:08we

31:08need

31:08these

31:08alternatives

31:09we

31:09need

31:09to

31:09control

31:09these

31:10things

31:10the

31:10Dar es Salaam

31:11port

31:11in

31:12Tanzania

31:12Adani

31:14group

31:14controls

31:15the

31:16major

31:16container

31:17terminal

31:17of

31:17the

31:18Dar es Salaam

31:18port

31:18in

31:18Tanzania

31:19this

31:20is

31:20a

31:20pivotal

31:21port

31:23in

31:24East

31:24Africa

31:25it

31:25has

31:26connectivity

31:26with

31:27all

31:27the

31:27landlocked

31:28nations

31:29like

31:29Congo

31:30Rwanda

31:30etc

31:31in the

31:31region

31:31through

31:32roads

31:32through

31:33railways

31:33and

31:34it

31:34gives

31:34India

31:35access

31:35to

31:35the

31:35African

31:36markets

31:36and

31:36the

31:37vital

31:37African

31:37resources

31:38that

31:38we

31:38need

31:38Africa

31:39accounts

31:40for

31:40about

31:40half

31:40of

31:40the

31:41world

31:41resources

31:41we

31:42need

31:42access

31:42to

31:42that

31:43and

31:43this

31:43is

31:43a

31:43region

31:44in

31:44which

31:44China

31:44has

31:45tremendous

31:45geopolitical

31:46leverage

31:46we

31:47need

31:47to

31:47balance

31:48that

31:48somehow

31:49and

31:49we

31:49need

31:49to

31:49also

31:49have

31:50a

31:50foothold

31:50in

31:51these

31:51regions

31:51so

31:52if

31:52you

31:52look

31:53at

31:53all

31:53the

31:53ports

31:53the

31:54Adani

31:54group

31:55is

31:55going

31:55to

31:55have

31:55a

31:55port

31:55in

31:56Vietnam

31:56as

31:57well

31:57which

31:57will

31:57give

31:58India

31:59a

31:59strategic

32:00position

32:00in

32:01Southeast

32:01Asia

32:01in

32:01the

32:02South

32:02China

32:02Sea

32:02where

32:02China

32:03controls

32:03so

32:04much

32:04and

32:05they

32:05want

32:05complete

32:05geopolitical

32:06control

32:07in

32:07the

32:07region

32:07so

32:08we

32:09have

32:09talked

32:09about

32:09the

32:10ports

32:10what

32:10about

32:11energy

32:11Adani

32:12group

32:12is

32:12operating

32:14various

32:15thermal

32:16energy

32:16generation

32:17plants

32:17in

32:17India

32:18cool

32:18fire

32:18generation

32:19plants

32:19it's

32:20India's

32:20largest

32:21private

32:21energy

32:22generator

32:23without

32:24energy

32:25your

32:25economy

32:25won't

32:26run

32:26right

32:27so

32:27we

32:27need

32:27energy

32:28we

32:28need

32:28private

32:29players

32:29to

32:29step

32:29up

32:30the

32:30Adani

32:31green

32:31branch

32:33of

32:33the

32:33Adani

32:34power

32:34they

32:35are

32:36India's

32:36largest

32:37alternative

32:37energy

32:39producers

32:40you know

32:40solar

32:41and wind

32:42and so

32:42on

32:42Kavda

32:42is one

32:43of the

32:43major

32:44projects

32:45that they

32:45are doing

32:45so

32:46that

32:46not only

32:47gives

32:47us

32:48energy

32:48that

32:49is

32:49which

32:50will

32:50be

32:50increasing

32:50and

32:50more

32:51relevant

32:51in

32:51the

32:51long

32:52term

32:52it

32:53also

32:53positions

32:53India

32:54as

32:54responsible

32:55generator

32:56of

32:56energy

32:56it

32:57also

32:57because

32:57of

32:58the

32:58climate

32:58commitments

32:58that

32:59we

32:59have

32:59made

32:59and

33:00it

33:00positions

33:01us

33:01as

33:01a

33:02very

33:02responsible

33:02nation

33:03it

33:03bolsters

33:03our

33:04soft

33:04power

33:04so

33:05through

33:05the

33:05coal

33:05generation

33:06plants

33:06power

33:06generation

33:07plants

33:07Adani

33:08group

33:08is

33:08taking care

33:09of

33:09our

33:09immediate

33:10energy

33:10requirements

33:11through

33:11the

33:11green

33:11energy

33:12plants

33:12we

33:12are

33:12taking

33:12care

33:13of

33:13long

33:13term

33:13energy

33:14requirements

33:14right

33:15the

33:16Adani

33:17group

33:17is

33:17building

33:17railways

33:18hundreds

33:18of

33:18kilometers

33:19of

33:19railways

33:19that

33:20connect

33:20very

33:21important

33:22things

33:22the

33:22ports

33:23the

33:23mines

33:24and

33:24the

33:24business

33:24centers

33:25which

33:26increases

33:26economic

33:27efficiency

33:27in

33:27India

33:28right

33:28so

33:29whatever

33:30the

33:30Adani

33:30group

33:30is

33:30doing

33:30for

33:31example

33:31mines

33:32once

33:32again

33:32we're

33:32talking

33:32about

33:32in

33:33Australia

33:33they

33:34have

33:34the

33:34Carmichael

33:34mine

33:35which

33:35faced

33:36tremendous

33:37resistance

33:37protests

33:38I mean

33:39the

33:39Chappell

33:40brothers

33:40got involved

33:41in

33:41the

33:41protests

33:41you

33:41know

33:41Greg

33:42Chappell

33:43and

33:43Ian

33:43Chappell

33:43Greg

33:44Chappell

33:44the

33:44infamous

33:45former

33:45coach

33:46of

33:46the

33:46Indian

33:46national

33:46team

33:47who

33:47created

33:47so

33:47much

33:48trouble

33:48for

33:48India

33:48so

33:49they

33:49got

33:49involved

33:49in

33:50this

33:50protest

33:50and

33:50they

33:50wanted

33:51to

33:51shut

33:51this

33:51mining

33:52operation

33:52down

33:52so

33:53but

33:54by

33:54doing

33:55this

33:56mining

33:56operation

33:56we

33:57are

33:57strategically

33:58integrating

33:58ourselves

33:59with

33:59the

33:59Australian

33:59economy

34:00which

34:00is

34:00great

34:01for

34:01the

34:01two

34:01nations

34:01the

34:03Adani

34:04group

34:04has

34:04a

34:05power

34:05generation

34:05plant

34:05in

34:06Jharkhand

34:06which

34:07supplies

34:07about

34:0710%

34:08of

34:08Bangladesh's

34:09electricity

34:09which

34:11integrates

34:11creates

34:12interoperability

34:13between

34:13the

34:13two

34:13countries

34:14which

34:14integrates

34:14Bangladesh

34:15into

34:15the

34:15Indian

34:15economics

34:16into

34:16the

34:17Indian

34:17economic

34:17electric

34:18supply

34:18which

34:18also

34:19gives

34:19India

34:19leverage

34:20over

34:20Bangladesh

34:21hydroelectric

34:22plants

34:22in

34:23Bhutan

34:23and

34:23Nepal

34:23these

34:24are

34:24viable

34:25alternatives

34:25to

34:26existing

34:26and

34:26future

34:27Chinese

34:27investments

34:28in

34:28these

34:28nations

34:28China

34:29wants

34:29to

34:29break

34:29out

34:29these

34:30nations

34:30from

34:30the

34:30Indian

34:31sphere

34:32so

34:32if

34:33we

34:33have

34:33these

34:34investments

34:35in

34:35these

34:35countries

34:36which

34:36will

34:36produce

34:37electricity

34:39and

34:39give

34:40them

34:40local

34:40solutions

34:41to

34:41their

34:41problems

34:42then

34:42it

34:42once

34:43again

34:43creates

34:43interoperability

34:44with

34:44India

34:44it

34:45enhances

34:45our

34:46neighborhood

34:47first

34:47policy

34:48which

34:48is

34:48a

34:48vital

34:49component

34:49of

34:49our

34:49foreign

34:50policy

34:50and

34:51the

34:51plants

34:51for

34:52example

34:52hydroelectric

34:53power

34:54supply

34:54projects

34:55in

34:55for

34:56example

34:56Indonesia

34:57in

34:57Vietnam

34:58which

34:58may

34:58happen

34:58in

34:58the

34:59future

34:59these

35:00will

35:00once

35:00again

35:00be

35:01a

35:01significant

35:02component

35:02of

35:02our

35:03act

35:03east

35:03policy

35:04so

35:05if

35:05you

35:05look

35:05at

35:05everything

35:06the

35:06Adani

35:06group

35:06is

35:07doing

35:07it

35:07is

35:08strategically

35:08aligned

35:09with

35:09India

35:09strategic

35:10interests

35:10with

35:11our

35:11national

35:11security

35:12the

35:12Adani

35:13group

35:13produces

35:13arms

35:14ammunition

35:15weapons

35:16more than

35:17150

35:17million

35:18rounds

35:19of

35:19small

35:20arms

35:20ammunition

35:21which

35:21is

35:21critical

35:22to

35:22our

35:22defense

35:22industry

35:23the

35:23Adani

35:23group

35:24produces

35:24loitering

35:25munitions

35:26kamikaze

35:27drones

35:27which

35:27were

35:27used

35:28in

35:28operation

35:28Sindur

35:29in

35:29cooperation

35:30with

35:30Israel

35:30in

35:31partnership

35:31with

35:32an

35:32Israeli

35:32company

35:32because

35:34of

35:34which

35:35we

35:35have

35:35technology

35:35transfer

35:36because

35:36of

35:36which

35:36we

35:36have

35:37local

35:37arms

35:37manufacturing

35:38in

35:38India

35:38the

35:39Adani

35:39group

35:39produces

35:40components

35:41related to

35:42fighter planes

35:43to

35:43helicopters

35:43to

35:44submarine

35:44so much

35:44more

35:44these

35:45things

35:46none

35:46of

35:46these

35:47things

35:47are

35:47public

35:47facing

35:48why

35:48do

35:48you

35:49think

35:49these

35:49two

35:49big

35:49business

35:50man

35:50continue

35:50to

35:51be

35:51the

35:51punching

35:51bag

35:51of

35:52the

35:52leader

35:52of

35:52opposition

35:52I

35:53don't

35:53know

35:53about

35:54the

35:54leader

35:54of

35:54opposition

35:55but

35:55they

35:55are

35:55all

35:55the

35:55political

35:56parties

35:56continue

35:57with

35:57at

35:57the

35:58end

35:58of

35:58the

35:58day

35:58it

35:59is

35:59being

35:59said

35:59everything

36:00has

36:00been

36:00given

36:00to

36:00them

36:00you

36:01have

36:01justified

36:01everything

36:02explained

36:02everything

36:03why

36:03they

36:03are

36:03so

36:04critical

36:04to

36:04India's

36:05growth

36:05but

36:05why

36:05are

36:06both

36:07of

36:07them

36:07are

36:07the

36:07punching

36:07bag

36:08why

36:08not

36:08others

36:08so

36:09if

36:09we

36:09let's

36:10say

36:10create

36:11problems

36:11for

36:12these

36:12groups

36:12and

36:13if

36:13their

36:14business

36:14operations

36:14end

36:15then

36:16India

36:17loses

36:17all

36:17disadvantages

36:18it

36:18has

36:19India

36:19national

36:20security

36:20suffers

36:21tremendously

36:22India

36:22control

36:23of

36:23critical

36:24trade

36:25networks

36:26supply

36:26chains

36:27suffers

36:27and

36:28maybe

36:28it

36:28disappears

36:29India

36:30port

36:30acquisitions

36:31go

36:32away

36:32and

36:32then

36:32we

36:33are

36:33completely

36:33vulnerable

36:34to

36:34the

36:35Chinese

36:35and

36:36other

36:36major

36:36powers

36:37who

36:37will

36:38supply

36:38us

36:38what

36:39we

36:39need

36:39but

36:40on

36:40their

36:40terms

36:40and

36:41the

36:41supply

36:41will

36:42be

36:42capricious

36:42so

36:44if

36:45the

36:45Adani

36:45group

36:45is

36:46you

36:46know

36:46destabilized

36:48if

36:48all

36:49kinds

36:49of

36:49troubles

36:49are

36:50created

36:50for

36:50it

36:50then

36:50India's

36:51strategic

36:52autonomy

36:53suffers

36:53India's

36:54economy

36:54suffers

36:55India's

36:55national

36:56security

36:56suffers

36:56and

36:57these

36:57are

36:57the

36:58objectives

36:58of

36:58foreign

36:59powers

36:59who

36:59seek

36:59to

37:00encircle

37:00and

37:01contain

37:01India

37:01so

37:02it

37:02makes

37:02tremendous

37:02sense

37:03to

37:03go

37:04after

37:04these

37:04whichever

37:05businesses

37:05are

37:06aligned

37:06with

37:06our

37:07national

37:07interest

37:07so

37:08it

37:08makes

37:08a lot

37:08of

37:08sense

37:09I

37:09am

37:09not

37:09sure

37:09about

37:10what's

37:10happening

37:10in

37:10domestic

37:11politics

37:11I

37:16hypothetically

37:17allegedly

37:17okay

37:18you

37:18just

37:18mentioned

37:18China

37:19Prime

37:19Minister

37:19Modi

37:20visited

37:20China

37:21and

37:21met

37:21Xi

37:21Jinping

37:22there

37:22a lot

37:23of

37:23criticism

37:23is

37:24coming

37:24that

37:24one

37:25should

37:25never

37:25trust

37:26China

37:26looking at

37:26the

37:26history

37:27we

37:27have

37:27had

37:27New

37:28Delhi

37:28and

37:28Beijing

37:29the

37:29history

37:29that

37:29we

37:29share

37:30China

37:30is

37:30not

37:31someone

37:31you

37:31can

37:31trust

37:32they

37:32are

37:32always

37:32going

37:32to

37:33backstab

37:33you

37:33they

37:33are

37:33always

37:34going

37:34to

37:34kill

37:35you

37:35in

37:35a

37:35sense

37:36at

37:36the

37:36border

37:36they

37:37would

37:37do

37:37anything

37:37to

37:38encroach

37:38your

37:38land

37:38how

37:39should

37:39India

37:39deal

37:40with

37:40it

37:40in

37:40the

37:41entire

37:41fiasco

37:42with

37:42Trump

37:42and

37:43United

37:43States

37:43it

37:44seems

37:44so

37:44that

37:45China

37:45in

37:46New

37:46Delhi

37:46is

37:46moving

37:46towards

37:47China

37:47is

37:47it

37:47a

37:48good

37:48thing

37:48or

37:48bad

37:48thing

37:49so

37:49the

37:49criticism

37:50seems

37:50to

37:50be

37:50that

37:50India

37:50is

37:51trusting

37:51China

37:51is

37:52India

37:52trusting

37:53China

37:53is

37:53the

37:53question

37:54I

37:54would

37:54like

37:54to

37:54ask

37:55you

37:56can't

37:57trust

37:57anybody

37:57in

37:58geopolitics

37:58even

37:59your

38:07wherever

38:07my

38:07national

38:08interest

38:08aligns

38:09with

38:10another

38:10country's

38:11certain

38:12national

38:12interests

38:12in

38:13those

38:13matters

38:14in

38:14those

38:14sectors

38:15we

38:15can

38:15cooperate

38:15but

38:17if

38:17you

38:17look

38:17at

38:18the

38:18track

38:18record

38:18of

38:18China

38:19it

38:19seeks

38:20it's

38:20an

38:20adversary

38:21of

38:21India

38:21we

38:22know

38:22that

38:22very

38:22well

38:22we

38:22have

38:22gone

38:22to

38:23war

38:23with

38:23them

38:231962

38:24we

38:24had

38:24a

38:24war

38:24in

38:251967

38:25we

38:25had

38:25clashes

38:26in

38:261987

38:26the

38:27last

38:2710

38:27years

38:27we

38:28had

38:28more

38:28clashes

38:282020

38:30also

38:31Galwan

38:37would

38:37like

38:37to

38:37see

38:37India

38:38be

38:38fragmented

38:39balkanized

38:39so

38:40we

38:40know

38:40exactly

38:41what

38:41China

38:41seeks

38:42to

38:42do

38:42first

38:43of

38:43all

38:43we

38:43have

38:43to

38:44understand

38:44the

38:45nature

38:45of

38:45the

38:45nation

38:46what

38:47is

38:47China

38:48and

38:48what

38:48does

38:48it

38:48seek

38:49what

38:50are

38:50its

38:50ambitions

38:51China's

38:52ambition

38:52is

38:52to

38:53replace

38:54and

38:54displace

38:54the

38:54United

38:55States

38:55as

38:56the

38:56global

38:56superpower

38:57by

38:57about

38:582050

38:58and

38:59it

38:59can't

38:59do

39:00that

39:00as

39:00long

39:00as

39:01there

39:01is

39:01another

39:01major

39:02power

39:02in

39:02Asia

39:03right

39:03so

39:04it

39:04would

39:04like

39:04to

39:05undermine

39:05India

39:05I

39:06don't

39:06think

39:07Mr.

39:07Modi

39:07is

39:07at

39:08all

39:08trusting

39:08China

39:09you

39:10have

39:10to

39:10deal

39:10with

39:11your

39:11adversaries

39:12also

39:13I

39:13mean

39:13look

39:14at

39:14the

39:14US

39:15and

39:15China

39:15they

39:15are

39:15always

39:16communicating

39:17they

39:17have

39:18summit

39:18meetings

39:19from

39:19time

39:19to

39:19time

39:20despite

39:20being

39:21at

39:21loggerheads

39:21look

39:23at

39:23Pakistan

39:23and

39:24China

39:24even

39:25now

39:25that

39:25Pakistan

39:26is

39:26completely

39:27in

39:27the

39:27US

39:27camp

39:28the

39:28Chinese

39:28and

39:28Pakistan

39:29are

39:29still

39:29talking

39:29Shahbaz

39:30Sharif

39:30still

39:30goes

39:31to

39:31the

39:31Stanghai

39:32Cooperation

39:32summit

39:32you

39:33have

39:34to

39:34be

39:34practical

39:35and

39:35pragmatic

39:35in

39:35geopolitics

39:36China

39:37is

39:37a

39:37long

39:38term

39:38adversary

39:38as

39:39long

39:39as

39:39the

39:39Tibet

39:40region

39:41is

39:41under

39:41Chinese

39:42control

39:42India

39:43and

39:43China

39:43will

39:43never

39:43have

39:44long

39:44lasting

39:45peace

39:45Tibet

39:46was

39:46historically

39:46never

39:47part

39:47of

39:47China

39:47right

39:48now

39:48it

39:48is

39:48under

39:48Chinese

39:49occupation

39:49which

39:50is

39:50why

39:50for

39:50the

39:50first

39:50time

39:51in

39:512000

39:51years

39:52we

39:52have

39:52a

39:52common

39:52border

39:53between

39:53India

39:53and

39:53Chinese

39:54occupied

39:54territory

39:54and

39:55that

39:55is

39:55the

39:55issue

39:56the

39:56Chinese

39:56don't

39:56want

39:56to

39:57resolve

39:57the

39:58undemarcated

39:58border

39:59issue

39:59the

39:59India

39:59Tibet

40:00border

40:00and

40:00that

40:00is

40:00the

40:00root

40:01cause

40:01of

40:01all

40:01the

40:01problems

40:01right

40:02so

40:03right

40:03now

40:03why

40:03are

40:04India

40:04and

40:04China

40:04seeming

40:05to

40:05align

40:06to

40:06some

40:06extent

40:06why

40:07is

40:07that

40:07because

40:07both

40:08are

40:08facing

40:08tremendous

40:09pressure

40:09from

40:09a

40:09much

40:09more

40:10powerful

40:10nation

40:10which

40:11is

40:11the

40:11US

40:11the

40:12US

40:12has

40:12gone

40:12all

40:13out

40:13against

40:13China

40:14tremendous

40:14tariffs

40:15have been

40:15imposed

40:15on

40:16China

40:16the

40:17US

40:17used

40:18to

40:18export

40:18semiconductors

40:19and

40:19chips

40:19and

40:19whatnot

40:20to

40:20China

40:20they

40:20have

40:21imposed

40:21massive

40:21restrictions

40:22on

40:22that

40:22right

40:23and

40:23so

40:24much

40:24more

40:24so

40:25the

40:25US

40:25is

40:25going

40:26all

40:26out

40:26against

40:26China

40:27the

40:27US

40:27is

40:27going

40:27all

40:27out

40:28against

40:28Russia

40:28and

40:28now

40:29India

40:29also

40:30it

40:30makes

40:31sense

40:31for

40:31the

40:31three

40:31nations

40:31at

40:32the

40:32receiving

40:32end

40:32to

40:33kind

40:33of

40:33find

40:34some

40:34common

40:34ground

40:35India

40:35Russia

40:36tremendous

40:36common

40:36ground

40:37India

40:37and

40:37Russia

40:37have

40:38no

40:38rivalry

40:38no

40:39issues

40:39where

40:40we

40:40have

40:40disagreements

40:41major

40:41issues

40:41and so

40:42on

40:42India

40:42and

40:42China

40:43almost

40:43everything

40:43is

40:43a

40:43disagreement

40:44but

40:44maybe

40:45we

40:45can

40:45cooperate

40:45in

40:46some

40:46ways

40:46the

40:46Chinese

40:47recently

40:47imposed

40:48sanctions

40:48that

40:48people

40:49don't

40:49know

40:49of

40:49on

40:51India

40:52so

40:52they

40:52are

40:53playing

40:53a

40:53double

40:53game

40:53on

40:53the

40:53one

40:54hand

40:54we

40:54meet

40:54and

40:54we

40:54talk

40:54and

40:55the

40:55they

40:55are

40:55stabbing

40:56us

40:56like

40:56that

40:56it's

40:57not

40:57like

40:58we

40:58are

40:58not

40:58aware

40:58of

40:59it

40:59Mr

40:59Modi

40:59is

41:00not

41:00a

41:00new

41:00player

41:01in

41:01the

41:01game

41:01of

41:01geopolitics

41:02he

41:02understands

41:02exactly

41:03what's

41:03happening

41:03but

41:04we

41:04have

41:04to

41:05talk

41:05to

41:05our

41:05adversaries

41:06also

41:06we

41:06have

41:06to

41:06try

41:07and

41:07find

41:07a

41:07way

41:08to

41:08maybe

41:09establish

41:10some

41:10common

41:10ground

41:11in

41:11some

41:11places

41:12and

41:12maybe

41:13take

41:13the

41:13relationship

41:13forward

41:13maybe

41:14put

41:14the

41:14rivalry

41:15on

41:15hold

41:15for

41:15about

41:16a

41:16decade

41:16or

41:16so

41:16etc

41:17so

41:18it

41:18is

41:18not

41:19that

41:19we

41:19are

41:19blindly

41:19trusting

41:20China

41:20we

41:21are

41:21cautiously

41:21seeking

41:22the

41:23way

41:23forward

41:23and

41:23that

41:24is

41:24the

41:24right

41:24thing

41:24to

41:24do

41:25you

41:26just

41:26mentioned

41:27that

41:27China

41:27wants

41:27to

41:28surpass

41:28and

41:28become

41:29the

41:29superpower

41:29by

41:29the

41:30end

41:30of

41:302050

41:31but

41:31some

41:32US

41:32lawmakers

41:32think

41:33and

41:33they

41:33are

41:34telling

41:34people

41:34that

41:34China

41:35has

41:35already

41:35surpassed

41:36USA

41:36and

41:36they

41:37are

41:37already

41:37number

41:37one

41:37as

41:38far

41:38as

41:38chips

41:38are

41:39concerned

41:39manufacturing

41:40are

41:40concerned

41:40exports

41:41are

41:41concerned

41:41they

41:42are

41:42number

41:42one

41:43do

41:43you

41:43think

41:43they

41:43are

41:44number

41:44one

41:44right

41:44now

41:44no

41:45let

41:45me

41:45tell

41:45you

41:45why

41:45see

41:46the

41:47number

41:47one

41:47status

41:48is

41:48not

41:48based

41:49on

41:49one

41:49or

41:50two

41:50indicators

41:50it's

41:51based

41:51on

41:51cumulative

41:52hard

41:53power

41:53what

41:53is

41:54cumulative

41:54hard

41:54power

41:54what

41:55are

41:55the

41:55components

41:56of

41:56cumulative

41:56hard

41:56power

41:57one

41:57is

41:57economic

41:58power

41:58China

41:59could

41:59potentially

42:00from

42:00some

42:01measures

42:01be

42:01ahead

42:01of

42:01the

42:01US

42:02purchasing

42:02power

42:03parity

42:03etc

42:03PVP

42:04so

42:05that's

42:05economic

42:05power

42:05secondly

42:06military

42:07power

42:07military

42:08power

42:08you can

42:09calculate

42:09by

42:09assessing

42:10how much

42:11does

42:12each

42:12country

42:12spend

42:13on

42:13defense

42:14per

42:14year

42:14the

42:15US

42:15spends

42:16about

42:16800

42:16900

42:16billion

42:18dollars

42:18per

42:18year

42:18China

42:19about

42:19200

42:20300

42:20billion

42:20dollars

42:21so

42:21China

42:21is

42:21lower

42:21than

42:22the

42:22US

42:22thirdly

42:23what's

42:24your

42:24population

42:24what's

42:25your

42:25land

42:25area

42:25China

42:26has

42:26larger

42:27population

42:27than

42:27the

42:27US

42:27way

42:28larger

42:28similar

42:29land

42:29area

42:29slightly

42:30less

42:30than

42:30the

42:30US

42:30next

42:31nuclear

42:32weapons

42:32the

42:32US

42:33dominates

42:33China

42:33nuclear

42:34weapons

42:34number

42:34of

42:35nuclear

42:35weapons

42:35next

42:36is

42:36power

42:37projection

42:37capabilities

42:38how

42:39many

42:39extraterritorial

42:40military

42:41bases

42:41do you

42:41have

42:41outside

42:42of

42:42your

42:42country

42:42China

42:43has

42:43one

42:44or

42:44two

42:44the

42:44US

42:45has

42:45700

42:45the

42:47US

42:47dominates

42:48China

42:48overall

42:49China

42:49doesn't

42:50even

42:50come

42:50close

42:50to

42:51the

42:51US

42:51in

42:52overall

42:52hard

42:53power

42:53and

42:54power

42:54projection

42:55which

42:55is

42:55why

42:55I

42:56will

42:57clearly

42:57place

42:58China

42:58unambiguously

42:59at

42:59number

42:59two

43:00maybe

43:00not

43:01even

43:01number

43:01two

43:01if

43:02you

43:02talk

43:03about

43:03nuclear

43:03weapons

43:03and

43:04you

43:04assign

43:04a

43:04score

43:04to

43:04that

43:04Russia

43:05overtakes

43:05China

43:05so

43:06maybe

43:06China

43:07is

43:07number

43:07two

43:07or

43:07number

43:07three

43:08probably

43:08number

43:08three

43:08actually

43:09in

43:09terms

43:09of

43:10actual

43:10composite

43:11hard

43:11power

43:12but

43:12economically

43:12it's

43:13way

43:13ahead

43:13of

43:13Russia

43:13it

43:14is

43:15a

43:15very

43:15close

43:16challenger

43:16to

43:17the

43:17US

43:17militarily

43:18it

43:18is

43:19untested

43:19and

43:19militarily

43:20when it

43:20comes

43:20to

43:21the

43:21defense

43:22expenditure

43:22it

43:22is

43:23significantly

43:23below

43:23the

43:23US

43:24so

43:25that's

43:25where

43:25China

43:25stands

43:26so

43:26some

43:26people

43:26will

43:27claim

43:27for

43:28matters

43:28of

43:28national

43:29urgency

43:29maybe

43:30you

43:30want

43:30to

43:30light

43:31a

43:31fire

43:31under

43:32the

43:32nation

43:32so

43:32that

43:32it

43:33will

43:33be

43:34more

43:35vigorous

43:36in

43:36taking

43:38care

43:38of

43:38the

43:38interest

43:38so

43:39that's

43:39why

43:39you

43:39will

43:39claim

43:40that

43:40China

43:40is

43:40surpassing

43:41us

43:41but

43:41actually

43:42it's

43:42not

43:42but

43:43China

43:43seeks

43:43to

43:43so

43:44maybe

43:44by

43:442050

43:45they

43:45want

43:45to

43:45achieve

43:46all

43:46the

43:46indicators

43:47and

43:47good

43:48scores

43:48on

43:48all

43:49the

43:49indicators

43:49that

43:50will

43:50put

43:50it

43:50cumulatively

43:51ahead

43:51of

43:51the

43:51US

43:52in

43:52hard

43:52power

43:52right

43:53now

43:53it's

43:53not

43:53the

43:53case

43:53let's

43:54come

43:54to

43:54Russia

43:55and

43:55India

43:55ties

43:55president

43:57Trump

43:57has

43:57been

43:58saying

43:58for

43:58a

43:58while

43:59that

43:59PM

43:59Modi

44:00or

44:00New

44:00Delhi

44:00has

44:00assured

44:01him

44:01that

44:02we

44:02won't

44:02be

44:02buying

44:03more

44:03Russian

44:03oil

44:03and

44:04there's

44:05nothing

44:05like

44:05that

44:05from

44:05Indian

44:06side

44:06should

44:07India

44:15woodgun

44:15for

44:16him

44:16that

44:16why

44:16would

44:16you

44:17stop

44:17buying

44:17Russian

44:18oil

44:18just

44:18because

44:18Trump

44:19told

44:19you

44:19so

44:19what

44:20is

44:20the

44:20way

44:21out

44:21from

44:21here

44:21question

44:22one

44:22and

44:22question

44:22two

44:23Russia

44:23seems

44:24to be

44:24a

44:24great

44:24friend

44:24they

44:25have

44:25helped

44:25us

44:25since

44:26independence

44:26all

44:26the

44:27wars

44:27Bangladesh

44:27war

44:28and

44:28all

44:28the

44:28wars

44:28they

44:28have

44:29supplied

44:29us

44:29weapons

44:30and

44:30ammunitions

44:31but

44:31they

44:32are

44:32still

44:32giving

44:32jet

44:33engines

44:33to

44:33Pakistan

44:34and

44:34India

44:35requested

44:35them

44:35please

44:35do

44:36not

44:36do

44:36so

44:36but

44:36they

44:36are

44:36still

44:37doing

44:37so

44:37how

44:38do

44:38you

44:38see

44:38this

44:38difference

44:38okay

44:39let's

44:39take

44:39the

44:40second

44:40question

44:40first

44:40and

44:40then

44:41we'll

44:41deal

44:41with

44:41the

44:41first

44:42one

44:42yes

44:43see

44:43India

44:43and

44:44Russia

44:44we

44:44have

44:44this

44:44long

44:45standing

44:45relationship

44:46back

44:46from

44:46the

44:46USSR

44:47the

44:48USSR

44:49and

44:49India

44:49were

44:49significantly

44:50allied

44:50India

44:51you

44:51could

44:52some

44:52could

44:52allege

44:52that

44:53India

44:53was

44:53junior

44:53partner

44:54of

44:54the

44:54USSR

44:54back

44:55in

44:55the

44:5520th

44:55century

44:55whatever

44:56you

44:56want

44:56to

44:56say

44:56but

44:57the

44:57USSR

44:57see

44:58it

44:59has

44:59never

44:59really

44:59harmed

45:00India's

45:01national

45:01interests

45:01in

45:01any

45:02way

45:02and

45:02neither

45:02has

45:03Russia

45:03overall

45:04speaking

45:04on a

45:05macro

45:05perspective

45:05and

45:06the

45:06USSR

45:06came

45:07to

45:07India's

45:08aid

45:08in

45:08critical

45:08times

45:09for

45:09example

45:09in

45:101971

45:10when

45:11the

45:11US

45:11sent

45:12an

45:12aircraft

45:12carrier

45:13strike

45:13group

45:13in

45:13the

45:13Bay

45:13of

45:14Bengal

45:14and

45:14so

45:14did

45:15the

45:15UK

45:15but

45:16the

45:16Russians

45:16sent

45:17nuclear

45:17submarines

45:18there

45:18was

45:18a

45:18standoff

45:19and

45:19that's

45:19why

45:19the

45:19Americans

45:20in

45:20the

45:20West

45:20could

45:21not

45:21arm

45:21twist

45:21India

45:22into

45:22not

45:23liberating

45:23Bangladesh

45:24the

45:25Russians

45:25have

45:25supplied

45:26us

45:26with

45:26all

45:26kinds

45:27of

45:27arms

45:27ammunitions

45:28weapons

45:29fighter

45:29planes

45:30without

45:31any

45:31kill

45:31switches

45:32or

45:32back

45:32doors

45:33please

45:33understand

45:33that

45:34right

45:34the

45:35F-16

45:36the

45:37F-35

45:37they

45:38will

45:38come

45:38with

45:38kill

45:39switches

45:39and

45:39back

45:39doors

45:40it

45:40is

45:40not

45:40a

45:41figment

45:41of

45:41my

45:41imagination

45:42see

45:42what

45:42happened

45:43to

45:43Australia

45:43with

45:43their

45:43purchases

45:44of

45:49they

45:49could

45:50not

45:50aim

45:51they

45:52could

45:52not

45:52use

45:52the

45:53aircraft

45:53target

45:53acquisition

45:54systems

45:54on

45:55targets

45:55that

45:55they

45:56wanted

45:56to

45:56acquire

45:56the

45:57code

45:57would

45:58not

45:58allow

45:58them

45:58to

45:58and

45:58the

45:59Americans

45:59refused

45:59to

45:59change

46:00the

46:00code

46:00the

46:00code

46:01the

46:01software

46:01the

46:02Australians

46:02could

46:03not

46:03make

46:03the

46:03planes

46:03do

46:03what

46:04they

46:04wanted

46:04for

46:0420

46:04years

46:05until

46:05they

46:05cracked

46:06the

46:06code

46:06so

46:07that's

46:07what

46:07happens

46:07when

46:08you

46:08buy

46:08American

46:08systems

46:09the

46:09Russians

46:09have

46:10never

46:10done

46:10that

46:10to

46:10India

46:11once

46:11you

46:12acquire

46:12the

46:12fighter

46:12plane

46:13MiG-21

46:14MiG-whatever

46:15Sukhoi

46:15it's

46:16entirely

46:16yours

46:17the

46:17Russians

46:18can't

46:18remote

46:18control

46:18it

46:19or

46:19sabotage

46:19it

46:20so

46:20the

46:20Russians

46:20have

46:21been

46:21far

46:21more

46:21reliable

46:21right

46:22so

46:23we

46:23have

46:23a

46:23long

46:23standing

46:24partnership

46:24with

46:24the

46:25Russians

46:25of

46:25course

46:26there

46:26are

46:26some

46:26minor

46:26irritants

46:27look

46:28China

46:30and

46:30Russia

46:30they

46:31have

46:31a

46:31great

46:31relationship

46:32we

46:32all

46:32know

46:33that

46:33Russia

46:34has

46:34sold

46:34Brahmos

46:35missiles

46:36to

46:36India

46:36which

46:37are

46:38frightfully

46:38dangerous

46:38to

46:39China

46:39does

46:40China

46:40do

46:40a

46:40hue

46:40and

46:40cry

46:41they

46:41understand

46:42in

46:42the

46:42world

46:42of

46:43geopolitics

46:43you

46:43have

46:44certain

46:44things

46:45that

46:45a

46:45nation

46:45does

46:46for

46:46its

46:47economic

46:47interests

46:47or

46:47whatever

46:48and

46:48the

46:48Chinese

46:49also

46:49understand

46:50that

46:50Russia

46:50and

46:51India

46:51have

46:51a

46:52long

46:52standard

46:52partnership

46:52which

46:53is

46:53separate

46:54from

46:54the

46:54China

46:55Russia

46:55partnership

46:55right

46:56so

46:57we

46:57have

46:57to

46:57be

46:58a

46:58little

46:58mature

46:59Russia

47:00is

47:00selling

47:01a

47:01few

47:01jet

47:01engines

47:02to

47:02Pakistan

47:02it's

47:04not

47:04a

47:05major

47:05irritant

47:05in

47:05our

47:06ties

47:06they

47:06will

47:07never

47:07prioritize

47:07Pakistan

47:08or

47:08India

47:09if

47:09there's

47:09a

47:10war

47:10they

47:10will

47:10be

47:10on

47:10India

47:10side

47:11they

47:11might

47:11not

47:11come

47:11to

47:12fight

47:12for

47:12us

47:12but

47:13they

47:13will

47:13not

47:13be

47:14on

47:14the

47:14side

47:14of

47:14Pakistan

47:14that's

47:15what

47:15we

47:15have

47:16to

47:16understand

47:16from

47:16a

47:16macro

47:17perspective

47:17these

47:17small

47:18irritants

47:18here

47:18and

47:18there

47:18will

47:19come

47:19for

47:19example

47:20let

47:20me

47:20give

47:20you

47:20another

47:20example

47:21from

47:222015

47:22to

47:222021

47:23the

47:24Russians

47:24and

47:24Pakistani

47:25militaries

47:25conducted

47:26annual

47:27joint

47:28exercises

47:28called

47:29the

47:30Druzba

47:30exercises

47:31what does

47:31Druzba

47:31mean

47:32in

47:32Russian

47:32friendship

47:33Mitrata

47:34so

47:35did

47:35India

47:35protest

47:36no

47:36let

47:36them

47:36do

47:37it

47:37these

47:37are

47:37small

47:37matters

47:38it's

47:38just

47:39it

47:39doesn't

47:40really

47:40matter

47:40for

47:41the

47:41larger

47:42relationship

47:43right

47:44so

47:44that's

47:45how

47:45I

47:45see

47:45the

47:45India

47:45Russia

47:45relationship

47:46it

47:47is

47:47a

47:47very

47:47important

47:48relationship

47:48with

47:48both

47:49nations

47:49it

47:50is

47:50Russia

47:50most

47:51long

47:51standing

47:51relationship

47:52before

47:53I

47:54come

47:54to

47:54the

47:54oil

47:54question

47:55let's

47:55understand

47:56the

47:56Russia

47:56China

47:56relationship

47:57Russia

47:58and

47:58China

47:58are

47:58natural

47:59adversaries

48:00not

48:00allies

48:01let me

48:02explain

48:02why

48:02when

48:03two

48:03major

48:03powers

48:04have

48:04a

48:04common

48:04border

48:04they

48:05can't

48:05be

48:05friends

48:06they

48:06simply

48:07can't

48:07be

48:07friends

48:07in

48:08the

48:081960s

48:09in

48:091969

48:10Russia

48:10the

48:11USSR

48:11Russia's

48:12predecessor

48:13and

48:14China

48:14nearly

48:15went

48:15to

48:15war

48:16there

48:17were

48:17these

48:17massive

48:18border

48:18clashes

48:18the

48:18Usuri

48:19river

48:19clashes

48:20in

48:21the

48:21far

48:21east

48:21of

48:21Russia

48:22and

48:22China

48:22and

48:23the

48:23Russian

48:24the

48:24USSR's

48:24government

48:25had

48:25decided

48:25to

48:26launch

48:26nuclear

48:27strikes

48:27on

48:28China

48:28and

48:28the

48:29Americans

48:29intervened

48:31and said

48:31that

48:31if you

48:31nuke

48:32China

48:32we

48:32will

48:32nuke

48:32you

48:32and

48:33that's

48:33why

48:33the

48:33Americans

48:34saved

48:34China

48:35and

48:35they

48:35brought

48:35China

48:36onto

48:36their

48:36side

48:36right

48:37so

48:37that

48:38is

48:38the

48:38deal

48:38with

48:39Russia

48:39and

48:39China

48:39they

48:40are

48:40not

48:40natural

48:41partners

48:42they

48:42are

48:42natural

48:43adversaries

48:43the

48:44current

48:44cooperation

48:45understanding

48:46that

48:46they

48:46have

48:46is

48:47because

48:47of

48:47the

48:48greater

48:48threat

48:48that

48:48they

48:48face

48:49from

48:49outside

48:49the

48:49US

48:50and

48:50that's

48:50why

48:51they

48:51are

48:51cooperating

48:51it

48:52is

48:52not

48:52going

48:52to

48:52last

48:52forever

48:53Russia

48:53and

48:53India

48:54we

48:54are

48:54natural

48:54partners

48:55not

48:56natural

48:57adversaries

48:57so

48:58the

48:58India

48:58Russia

48:58relationship

48:59is

48:59very

48:59important

49:00now

49:00when

49:00it

49:00comes

49:01to

49:01oil

49:01you

49:02mentioned

49:03rightfully

49:03so

49:03that

49:04Trump

49:04has

49:04been

49:04claiming

49:05that

49:05Mr.

49:05Modi

49:06has

49:06promised

49:06him

49:07given

49:07him

49:07assurances

49:07multiple

49:08times

49:08that

49:09India

49:09will

49:09stop

49:09buying

49:10Russian

49:10oil

49:10so

49:11what

49:11should

49:11India

49:12do

49:12first

49:12of

49:12all

49:12Mr.

49:13Modi

49:13has

49:13made

49:14no

49:14such

49:14assurance

49:15to

49:16Mr.

49:16Trump

49:17Mr.

49:17Trump

49:17is

49:17trying

49:18to

49:18pressurize

49:18India

49:18by

49:19making

49:19these

49:19claims

49:20what

49:21should

49:21India

49:21do

49:22should

49:22India

49:22stop

49:23buying

49:23Russian

49:23oil

49:23to

49:24placate

49:24Mr.

49:25Trump

49:25to

49:25please

49:25Mr.

49:26Trump

49:26that

49:27will

49:27be

49:28a

49:28severe

49:28blow

49:29to

49:29our

49:29relationship

49:30with

49:31Russia

49:31see

49:32in

49:322022

49:33February

49:3322nd

49:38the West

49:38slammed

49:40and imposed

49:41all kinds

49:41of economic

49:42and other

49:42sanctions

49:43on Russia

49:44it sought

49:44to crush

49:45the Russian

49:45economy

49:46and Russia

49:47became

49:48significantly

49:48dependent

49:49on China

49:49it was

49:50in danger

49:52of becoming

49:52a junior

49:53partner

49:54or a

49:54vassal

49:54state

49:55of China

49:55one of the

49:56reasons

49:57this did not

49:58happen

49:58is because

49:59India

49:59started

49:59buying

50:00tremendous

50:00quantities

50:01of Russian

50:01oil

50:01and this

50:02acted

50:02as a

50:03pressure

50:03release

50:04valve

50:04for

50:05Russia

50:05right

50:06so

50:06we don't

50:07want

50:07to

50:07undermine

50:08Russia's

50:08world

50:08standing

50:09Russia

50:09is

50:09important

50:10for

50:10us

50:10we

50:11don't

50:11want

50:11Russia's

50:12economy

50:12to

50:12suffer

50:12because

50:12it

50:13is

50:13very

50:13important

50:13for

50:13us

50:14it

50:14gives

50:14us

50:14leverage

50:14over

50:15the

50:15west

50:15and

50:16western

50:16pressure

50:17if we

50:17stop

50:18buying

50:18oil

50:18from

50:18Russia

50:18it

50:19is

50:19a

50:19blow

50:19to

50:19the

50:20Russian

50:20economy

50:20we

50:21are

50:21buying

50:21significant

50:21quantities

50:22of

50:22oil

50:22from

50:22Russia

50:23so

50:23if

50:23India

50:24stops

50:24buying

50:24oil

50:25from

50:25Russia

50:25citing

50:26whatever

50:26maybe

50:27Trump's

50:27pressure

50:28maybe

50:28economic

50:28reasons

50:29maybe

50:29prices

50:29it

50:30will

50:30be

50:30a

50:30blow

50:31for

50:31Russia

50:31and

50:31that

50:31would

50:31be

50:32a

50:32blow

50:32for

50:32India

50:32also

50:33in

50:33an

50:33indirect

50:34second

50:34order

50:34third

50:35order

50:35way

50:35and

50:36that's

50:36something

50:37which

50:37is

50:37not

50:38desirable

50:38for

50:39India's

50:39strategic

50:40autonomy

50:40and

50:41national

50:41security

50:41and

50:42overall

50:42geopolitical

50:43equations

50:43so

50:44we

50:44should

50:44not

50:45stop

50:46buying

50:46oil

50:46from

50:46Russia

50:47if

50:48the

50:48Americans

50:48insist

50:48that

50:48you

50:49buy

50:49oil

50:50from

50:50elsewhere

50:50we

50:50can

50:51maybe

50:51buy

50:51some

50:51oil

50:51from

50:51the

50:52US

50:52some

50:59looking

50:59at

51:00the

51:00governments

51:00being

51:01toppled

51:01around

51:01us

51:02we

51:02have

51:03spoken

51:03about

51:03examples

51:04in

51:04Nepal

51:04Bangladesh

51:05Sri Lanka

51:05and

51:06Pakistan

51:06should

51:07India

51:07be

51:07worried

51:08of

51:08some

51:08sort

51:08of

51:08you

51:09know

51:09protests

51:10or

51:10proxy

51:10war

51:11in

51:11near

51:11future

51:11should

51:12be

51:12very

51:12concerned

51:12very

51:13concerned

51:16one

51:16of

51:17the

51:17ways

51:17of

51:17destabilizing

51:18a

51:18government

51:19I

51:19failed

51:19to

51:20mention

51:20is

51:20electoral

51:21interference

51:22interfering

51:23with

51:24the

51:24electoral

51:24process

51:25of

51:25a

51:25nation

51:25so

51:26these

51:27colour

51:27revolutions

51:28or

51:28regime

51:29change

51:29operations

51:30that

51:30you

51:30mentioned

51:30Bangladesh

51:31Sri

51:31Lanka

51:32Nepal

51:32now

51:33we

51:33have

51:33Madagascar

51:33as

51:34well

51:34and

51:34there's

51:35a

51:35whole

51:35long

51:35list

51:36behind

51:36that

51:36these

51:37all

51:38follow

51:38the

51:38same

51:38template

51:39the

51:40nation

51:42that

51:42carries

51:43out

51:43the

51:44regime

51:44changes

51:44it

51:44first

51:45creates

51:46assets

51:47in

51:47the

51:47target

51:47country

51:48it

51:49creates

51:49all

51:49kinds

51:49of

51:49assets

51:50one

51:50of

51:50the

51:51ways

51:51is

51:51by

51:52funding

51:53NGOs

51:54NGOs

51:55are

51:58society

51:59social

52:00service

52:00and

52:00all

52:00but

52:01through

52:01that

52:01you

52:01can

52:01start

52:02activism

52:02and

52:02what

52:02not

52:02you

52:03know

52:03and

52:03undermine

52:04the

52:04government

52:04and

52:04its

52:05credibility

52:05another

52:06way

52:06is

52:06by

52:06industrial

52:07scale

52:08religious

52:08conversions

52:09okay

52:10industrial

52:11scale

52:11religious

52:12conversions

52:12which

52:12is

52:12an

52:12activity

52:13that's

52:13happening

52:13in

52:13various

52:13parts

52:14of

52:14India

52:14by

52:15doing

52:15that

52:15you

52:15create

52:15an

52:15anti

52:16national

52:16sentiment

52:16why

52:17am I

52:17saying

52:18such

52:18a

52:18horrible

52:18thing

52:18well

52:19the

52:19Chinese

52:20and

52:20the

52:20Japanese

52:20historically

52:21have

52:21been

52:21at

52:21the

52:21receiving

52:22end

52:22of

52:22this

52:22the

52:23Chinese

52:23in

52:24the

52:241850s

52:26around

52:27the

52:27time

52:27of

52:28the

52:28opium

52:28wars

52:29or

52:29the

52:29Dungan

52:29revolt

52:30and

52:30so

52:30much

52:30more

52:30there

52:31were

52:32attempts

52:32to

52:32transform

52:33the

52:34demographics

52:34of

52:34China

52:35through

52:36missionary

52:36activity

52:36even

52:38during

52:38the

52:38Mongol

52:39Empire

52:39the

52:39daughter

52:40in

52:40law

52:40of

52:40Genghis

52:41Khan

52:41Sorhat

52:41Tani

52:42Beki

52:42she

52:42was

52:42a

52:43historian

52:43Christian

52:43and

52:44her

52:44son

52:44eventually

52:45went

52:45on

52:45to

52:45be

52:45the

52:45emperor

52:46of

52:46China

52:46so

52:47there

52:47have

52:47been

52:47these

52:47attempts

52:47in

52:47the

52:48past

52:48also

52:48even

52:48now

52:48to

52:49use

52:50religious

52:50conversions

52:51to

52:51undermine

52:52national

52:53interest

52:53the

52:54Japanese

52:54and

52:54the

52:54Chinese

52:55both

52:55wrote

52:56about

52:56this

52:57in

52:57the

52:57past

52:57in

52:57the

52:58past

52:58few

52:58centuries

52:58that

52:59whenever

53:00certain

53:01population

53:01whenever

53:01the

53:02populations

53:02are

53:02converted

53:03they

53:04somehow

53:04develop

53:05extraterritorial

53:07loyalties

53:07and the

53:08Chinese

53:08coined

53:09a term

53:10for

53:10the

53:10people

53:10who

53:11are

53:11converted

53:11Rice

53:12Christians

53:12this

53:13is

53:13a

53:13matter

53:13of

53:13historical

53:13record

53:14I

53:14not

53:14inventing

53:14it

53:15so

53:15one

53:15of

53:15the

53:16ways

53:16is

53:16to

53:16do

53:17this

53:17religious

53:17conversions

53:18and

53:18then

53:18you

53:18have

53:19those

53:19groups

53:19support

53:19the

53:20foreign

53:20activity

53:20so

53:21you

53:21cultivate

53:22academics

53:23you

53:23cultivate

53:23business

53:24leaders

53:24you

53:25do

53:25religious

53:25conversions

53:26you

53:26support

53:26NGOs

53:27you

53:28create

53:28narratives

53:28you

53:29cultivate

53:30business

53:30people

53:30you

53:30cultivate

53:31political

53:31parties

53:31and

53:32you

53:32create

53:33an

53:34astroturfed

53:35mass

53:35movement

53:36there

53:36is

53:36something

53:36called

53:37the

53:37no

53:37kings

53:37movement

53:38that's

53:38happening

53:38in

53:38the

53:38US

53:38right

53:39now

53:39against

53:40Trump

53:40against

53:40Trump

53:41is

53:41that

53:41a

53:42genuine

53:42grassroots

53:43movement

53:43I mean

53:43it's

53:44in

53:44the

53:44US

53:44we're

53:44talking

53:44about

53:44India

53:45but

53:45let

53:45me

53:45just

53:45explain

53:45what

53:46that

53:46is

53:46also

53:46yeah

53:47is

53:47that

53:47something

53:48that's

53:48genuine

53:48is

53:49it

53:49something

53:49that

53:49the

53:49people

53:50are

53:50spontaneously

53:50doing

53:51well

53:52Fox News

53:53and other

53:53outlets

53:53have

53:53reported

53:54that

53:54the

53:56organization

53:56indivisible

53:57that

53:58is

53:58organizing

53:59the

53:59no

53:59kings

53:59protests

54:00it

54:00has

54:00received

54:01more

54:01than

54:0110

54:0111

54:02million

54:02dollars

54:03from

54:03Soros

54:03George

54:03Soros

54:04and

54:04his

54:04organizations

54:05and

54:06other

54:07organizations

54:07like

54:07the

54:07Rockefeller

54:08Foundation

54:08and

54:09Bill

54:09Gates

54:10and

54:10whatnot

54:10are

54:10also

54:11involved

54:11in

54:11funding

54:12these

54:12organizations

54:13that

54:14are

54:14organizing

54:15the

54:15protests

54:16so

54:16when

54:17you

54:17have

54:17billionaires

54:18who

54:19are

54:19funding

54:19organizations

54:20that

54:20are

54:20professionally

54:21organizing

54:22protests

54:23is

54:24it

54:24really

54:24a

54:24grassroots

54:24movement

54:25so

54:25you

54:26so

54:27to

54:27do

54:28a

54:28movement

54:28across

54:28the

54:29United

54:29States

54:29across

54:2950

54:29states

54:30for

54:30example

54:30let's

54:31say

54:31it's

54:31not

54:31full

54:3150

54:33you

54:33need

54:33tremendous

54:33logistical

54:34support

54:35you

54:35need

54:35lot

54:35of

54:36tremendous

54:36amounts

54:37of

54:37money

54:37you

54:37need

54:38people

54:38on

54:38the

54:38ground

54:38professionals

54:39on

54:39the

54:39ground

54:39who

54:39are

54:39organizing

54:40everybody

54:40or

54:41bringing

54:41everybody

54:42on

54:43time

54:43to

54:43so

54:43and

54:43so

54:43place

54:44giving

54:44them

54:44food

54:44whatever

54:44is

54:44required

54:45this

54:45is

54:46a

54:46professional

54:46movement

54:48this

54:48is

54:48professionally

54:49executed

54:49movement

54:49it's

54:50not

54:50a

54:50grassroots

54:50movement

54:51but

54:51when

54:51a

54:52few

54:52million

54:52people

54:52come

54:52out

54:53on

54:53the

54:53roads

54:54then

54:54other

54:54people

54:55who

54:55are

54:55not

54:55part

54:56of

54:56the

54:56movement

54:56they

54:56will

54:56also

54:56feel

54:57maybe

54:57the

54:57government

54:57is

54:57wrong

54:58maybe

54:58we

54:58should

54:58go

54:58and

54:59support

54:59it

54:59and

55:00that's

55:00how

55:00you

55:00create

55:00an

55:01artificial

55:01movement

55:02right

55:02similarly

55:03these

55:05protests

55:06that happened

55:06in Bangladesh

55:07that led

55:07to the

55:07expulsion

55:08of

55:08Sheikh

55:08Hasina

55:08they

55:09were

55:09also

55:09similarly

55:10astroturfed

55:10and

55:11eventually

55:11Sheikh

55:12Hasina

55:12had to

55:12leave

55:12the

55:12country

55:13not

55:13because

55:13of

55:13the

55:13protests

55:14but

55:14because

55:14the

55:15Bangladesh

55:15military

55:15at

55:16the

55:16last

55:16minute

55:16gave

55:25well

55:25engineered

55:26it

55:26is

55:27made

55:27to

55:27appear

55:28like

55:28an

55:28organic

55:29spontaneous

55:29movement

55:31but

55:31there's

55:32always

55:32professional

55:33organization

55:34and

55:34tremendous

55:35amounts

55:35of

55:35funds

55:36that's

55:36behind

55:37all

55:37of

55:37this

55:37now

55:38similar

55:38things

55:39can

55:39also

55:39happen

55:39in

55:39India

55:40India

55:41I am

55:41sure

55:41is

55:41significantly

55:42penetrated

55:43and

55:44multiple

55:45assets

55:45of

55:46various

55:46kinds

55:46would

55:46have

55:46been

55:47cultivated

55:47within

55:47India

55:48India

55:48is

55:48a

55:49fully

55:49transparent

55:49country

55:50foreign

55:50organizations

55:51and

55:51foreign

55:51governments

55:52can

55:52fund

55:52various

55:52things

55:53not

55:53directly

55:54but

55:54through

55:54intermediaries

55:56etc

55:56NGO

55:57funding

55:57comes

55:57from

55:58other

55:58organizations

55:59that

55:59are not

55:59related

55:59directly

56:00to

56:00various

56:00governments

56:01and

56:02so

56:02on

56:03so

56:03it's

56:03definitely

56:04possible

56:05in

56:05the

56:05future

56:05that

56:05India

56:06may

56:06be

56:07the

56:07target

56:07of

56:07a

56:08regime

56:08change

56:08operation

56:08of

56:09a

56:09colour

56:09revolution

56:10kind

56:10of

56:10thing

56:10you

56:11may

56:11see

56:11increasing

56:12attacks

56:13on

56:13India

56:13in

56:13various

56:14ways

56:14more

56:14attacks

56:15on

56:15various

56:16business

56:18operations

56:18on

56:20the

56:20credibility

56:21of

56:21the

56:21government

56:21of

56:22India

56:22of

56:22Prime

56:22Minister

56:22Modi

56:23and

56:24so

56:24it's

56:24going

56:24to

56:25increase

56:25in

56:25my

56:25opinion

56:26we

56:26should

56:26be

56:26prepared

56:27for

56:27it

56:27social

56:28media

56:28manipulation

56:29so

56:29much

56:29more

56:29thank

56:30you

56:30sir

56:30thank

56:30you

56:30for

56:30having

56:30conversation

56:31a

56:31and

56:31I

56:31it was

56:32most welcome

56:32my pleasure

56:33it was

56:33nice speaking

56:34to you

56:34thank

56:34you

56:34thank

56:35you

Category

Transcript

Be the first to comment

Recommended