Skip to player
Skip to main content
Search
Connect
Watch fullscreen
Like
Bookmark
Share
More
Add to Playlist
Report
What Carlyle's Proprietary Data Signal About the Economy
Bloomberg
Follow
2 months ago
Category
🗞
News
Transcript
Display full video transcript
00:00
Jason, great to see you. And this is the holy grail, right? Even whether we have the data or not,
00:05
what alternative data can you use to get a handle on this economy?
00:08
So what did you look at to compile this picture of America?
00:14
So we have 277 portfolio companies currently that employ about 730,000 people. So each month,
00:23
and we've been doing this for about 15 years, we get a lot of data from those companies,
00:28
business volumes, revenues, orders, backlogs, prices paid, prices received. Very often,
00:36
it's by a number of different business lines from the company. So again, a large number of
00:40
time series from each company. So we have a very large matrix that we then weight. So we have an
00:46
algorithm that essentially weights those data to replicate time series of interest like GDP
00:52
or payroll employment, industrial production, other series like that. And then each month,
00:59
we get the data that come in, again, after going through this weighting algorithm. And we measure
01:03
where it is in relation to the prior trend, and measure how discrepant that is relative to our
01:09
expectations. And if it's statistically significant, we move the estimate up or down proportionally.
01:15
And then, of course, we look at the evolution of official statistics. Very often, they're
01:22
significantly revised. I think it's important that everyone recognize that these official
01:26
statistics are not handed down on stone tablets. They're just estimates, too. They're using the
01:31
same sort of sampling techniques. And then, you know, over a period of, say, six months,
01:36
we can reweight our data if there's any signs that it's not quite tracking the official statistics
01:42
statistics as well as it had in the past. Well, Jason, do you, I mean, I assume you backtest
01:47
your data against the Bureau of Labor and Statistics. So I'm wondering how well does it
01:53
track? And, or do you believe that maybe you're getting a better picture of the U.S. labor market
01:59
than the BLS? Well, you know, I think that the, first of all, when you think about the weighting
02:05
algorithm, essentially, we have enough data that we can perfectly replicate over the prior five
02:11
years. So at a backward-looking basis, the sample is very much selected so that it can
02:18
perfectly capture it. And then on a go-forward basis, you know, the correlations over the
02:23
next three to six months range between, you know, 60 to 90 percent. So, again, pretty good
02:29
on a forward-looking basis. I think the BLS has had a tough year, of course, when you think
02:36
about the scale of the revisions. They cover what they think is about 38 percent of payroll
02:42
employment in the United States. And I think it's always hard when you think about company
02:47
births and deaths. Of course, there's questions about the response rate and who is responding.
02:53
We saw that during the pandemic. And then, of course, they have an entirely separate series,
02:57
that is the unemployment survey, that, you know, is a very small percentage of the population.
03:04
Of course, it changes every month. But that's another area where, again, these are estimates.
03:11
This is, there's other ways to go about collecting data. So to say it's better, I mean, no one has
03:18
the sample or the breadth of the federal government when it comes to these things. But in terms of what's
03:24
important for investors, yes, I think there are better real-time indicators. And I think
03:30
the alternative data sources are something that a lot of people are really becoming much more attuned
03:35
to. Well, for what it showed you specifically, Jason, your estimates are for this most recent
03:39
jobs data that we didn't get would be that 17,000 jobs were created. You can look at that number in
03:44
face value and say that is painful and significantly below numbers before. How do you interpret 17,000,
03:51
especially as we ask questions of what the real break-even rate of jobs growth is considering
03:57
how much immigration is changing? That's right. I really think that that's the critical question
04:03
here as one evaluates this. If you just look at the raw numbers, you see an economy where payroll
04:09
employment growth was averaging about 200,000 at the start of the year. And that falls down, again,
04:14
in our estimates below 20,000. You would say, boy, this is an economy that is on the verge of recession
04:20
or perhaps has already succumbed to recession. But I don't think that's the correct interpretation
04:24
because it doesn't actually jibe with any of the other data that we're seeing. In fact,
04:30
we saw a GDP growth in the quarter of about 2.7 percent, a rebound in consumption, particularly
04:36
travel, tourism, live events, those experiences. And then, of course, business spending growing about
04:42
4.8 percent annualized rate according to our data. Much of that, again, the AI, this concentrated
04:50
CapEx boom. So I do think that there's some decline in labor demand. We did see some evidence that when
04:59
we, again, weight the sample for the broader U.S. corporate sector, that margins did contract relative
05:06
to year-ago levels. I think there's less hiring perhaps because of tariffs, related uncertainty.
05:12
But I do think most of this is explained on the supply side, which is to say, moving from a very
05:19
large volume of immigration to this year, what could be something close to net zero immigration.
05:25
The U.S. population, domestic population, is only expected to grow about 14 basis points this year.
05:33
Wow. If you apply that to 160 million payroll employment, that implies full employment,
05:41
monthly job growth of only about 18 or 19,000. It's pretty fascinating stuff. Really cool
05:49
data. Jason, love to have you back and talk about it as this story evolves. Jason Thomas there of Carlisle.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
Recommended
7:11
|
Up next
Fed Is in Wait-and-See Mode, Pimco's Clarida Says
Bloomberg
2 months ago
9:06
Fed's Barkin on Path for Economy Amid Tariff Uncertainty
Bloomberg
2 months ago
1:59
Fed's Barkin Says Data Show US on Same Trajectory as Last Year
Bloomberg
2 months ago
2:08
Fed Beige Book Shows Economic Activity Little Changed
Bloomberg
6 weeks ago
7:52
Rogoff Sees US Dollar Weakening Amid Trump Tariffs
Bloomberg
2 months ago
3:48
Fed Beige Book Shows Little Change in US Economic Activity
Bloomberg
2 months ago
3:22
Markets 'Jittery' Over Data Dump: Morgan Stanley's Caron
Bloomberg
2 months ago
4:36
US Services Activity Edges Up to a Nine-Month High
Bloomberg
5 weeks ago
10:53
Fed's Bostic on Rate Policy, Tariffs, Framework Review
Bloomberg
2 months ago
2:28
Fed Has Room for More Rate Cuts, Pimco's Wilding Says
Bloomberg
2 months ago
1:12
BlackRock's Rieder Says Fed Funds Rate Should Be at 3%
Bloomberg
2 months ago
2:06
Fed Is in Right Place Now to Respond to News: Vincent Reinhart
Bloomberg
3 weeks ago
4:35
Fed's Goolsbee Says Dissent Wasn't About Being a Hawk
Bloomberg
4 weeks ago
2:48
US Consumer Confidence Falls by Most Since April
Bloomberg
6 weeks ago
2:20
Fed's Bostic to Retire at End of Term in February
Bloomberg
2 months ago
1:58
Krugman Says US Consumer Sentiment Is at All-Time Worst
Bloomberg
2 months ago
4:07
Paramount Skydance Reports Earnings, Announces Job Cuts
Bloomberg
2 months ago
10:28
Minutes Show FOMC Split Over Inflation Concerns
Bloomberg
2 months ago
1:29
US Service Sector Stalls as Business Activity Shrinks
Bloomberg
2 months ago
2:11
Fed's Goolsbee Says New Tariffs May Be Pausing Decision-Making
Bloomberg
2 months ago
6:04
SoFi Benefits From Expanding Beyond Lending, Says CEO
Bloomberg
2 months ago
1:49
Fed's Musalem Says He Could Support Another Rate Cut
Bloomberg
2 months ago
1:14
Fed's Collins Advocates 'Actively Patient' Policy Approach
Bloomberg
2 months ago
5:00
Trump Should Stop Attacking the Fed, William Dudley Says
Bloomberg
2 months ago
0:50
Fed's Schmid Warns More Cuts May Stoke Inflation Risks
Bloomberg
2 months ago
Be the first to comment