Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
Transcript
00:00It was a great conversation. NASA had 180 days starting just a few days ago to prepare a plan
00:05for this responsive national security space architecture. Ed, will they get there? I mean,
00:10will they have this plan in a couple of months? Yeah, I mean, Administrator Eisenman's path to
00:16the White House wasn't straightforward, right? He was nominated earlier in the year, then the
00:20president pulled it and then the president had a change of heart and eventually he was confirmed.
00:24But the reason that the private sector in particular backs him is he's highly competent.
00:31You know, he's a successful entrepreneur. He is himself an astronaut. He's ambitious and wants
00:36to get things done. The main tension in the interview you just played is that the priority
00:41of this administration and therefore NASA and this country is principally first the moon. Right now,
00:47the leading commercial player in space is SpaceX. And as you guys know, Elon Musk, who leads SpaceX,
00:52has much broader goals to get humankind to Mars. And it was always going to be where did Mr.
00:59Isaacman focus first? And now he has a lot of support, bipartisan support across the aisle
01:05and a strong staff, competent staff of people at NASA that think he'll get it done. Whether he does,
01:11we'll have to see, Bonnie. Yeah. I mean, how important is Trump's support of NASA in terms of
01:17the U.S. being a leader in space exploration and innovation?
01:22Yeah. I mean, this was why I posed that question about the relevance of NASA, right? At the end of
01:27the day, NASA has a budget and it delegates contracts to various private sector names. How can it be
01:34anything more than that? The president, you know, in choosing someone like Jared Eisenman, he's of a
01:40different character mold, skill set to prior NASA administrators. He's not a political animal,
01:46really, based on his career. People see that as the president having strong support for America's
01:53leadership in space from a national security standpoint. And there is a great fixation with
01:58the moon, right? The great tagline that Isaacman has at the moment is we're going to build a base
02:03on the moon, an American base on the moon and go from there. Yeah. I mean, we all know that
02:09contracts have been awarded to SpaceX and Blue Origin, Ed, but what other companies are out there
02:14that would be bidding for these kinds of contracts or smaller contracts from NASA?
02:18Yeah. I think that the main thing to completely reiterate is that the reason that the contracts
02:25get awarded such as they do is on competitive grounds anyway. And when the later part of that
02:32interview that just played, I made the point that when Transport Secretary Duffy was in an interim
02:39basis leading NASA, he almost opened up the field again. Existing contracts said, let's get some of
02:44these smaller players involved. Isaacman's response to that, and to answer your question, was all of the
02:50parties, SpaceX, Blue Origin, and any other smaller players that might come along, go into it knowing
02:55that only those that can deliver will win the contract. The main thing is right now, SpaceX completely
03:00dominates payload to orbit. Of course, you have the United Launch Alliance, which is a historic JV
03:05between Boeing and Northrop. Boeing has had many well-documented problems. In the startup space,
03:13Rocket Lab is also being name-checked by Isaacman, and they, at much smaller scale to SpaceX, but are
03:18continuing to ramp their launch cadence, becoming an option for America in strategic payload to orbit.
03:24Well, you talked about SpaceX's potential IPO. How do you even value a company like SpaceX,
03:31especially if you think about, given its mix of commercial launches, Starlink, also government
03:36contracts? Here's what I know. SpaceX is well underway with plans for an IPO, maybe June of 2026.
03:44They just closed their latest tender or secondary, where employees are allowed to sell shares to
03:49investors. The company doesn't raise any money, but you have to set a share price. That price was set
03:54at $421 a share. Valuation on that private transaction, $800 billion. My understanding is
04:01they want to raise $30 to $40 billion. You can do the math on how much of the company they would
04:06prepare to offer in an IPO. And the valuation is somewhere between $1 and $1.5 trillion. And it's
04:14this idea that in the future, there's a cap on revenue, at least, that you can get from launching
04:19stuff into space. Elon Musk always used to say that it was about $3 billion per annum, but actually,
04:25SpaceX managed to move beyond that. So that valuation, how do you value it? It's on Starlink,
04:30space-based internet, and the whole rationale behind this IPO, the whole point of raising all that money,
04:36SpaceX sees a market for data centers in space. They need the capital to buy the GPUs,
04:42where they're at on the design of a space-based data center, who knows? But that's the reporting
04:46we've got.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended