RICHARD MILLER-The-Structure-of-Singing-171-260 - 9-9
The document discusses vowel modification in singing and how it relates to vocal health. It describes how vowels should naturally modify as pitch increases to maintain resonance. Too much or too little modification can be detrimental, and teachers must take care not to excessively 'close' or 'cover' vowels. Proper vowel modification provides advantages and should feel natural rather than drawing attention to itself.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0%(1)0% found this document useful (1 vote)
181 views1 page
RICHARD MILLER-The-Structure-of-Singing-171-260 - 9-9
The document discusses vowel modification in singing and how it relates to vocal health. It describes how vowels should naturally modify as pitch increases to maintain resonance. Too much or too little modification can be detrimental, and teachers must take care not to excessively 'close' or 'cover' vowels. Proper vowel modification provides advantages and should feel natural rather than drawing attention to itself.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
158 The Structure of Singing
power will very nearly accomplish this vowel adjustment. Indeed,
natural modification of the vowel will inevitably result in the mount ing scale in response to this subtle modification of the chambers of the resonator tube, with any specific conscious mechanical change at the level of the larynx unnecessary. (Of course, laryngeal config uration willchange with vowel definition. Additional muscular action isnot a conscious goal). This principle of arrotondamento is especially important, of course, in voce acuta, with |c i|modifying toward [o];[e]toward [e];[e] toward [a];[o]toward [o];[o]toward (u];and [u]toward [u].However, in the methodology of the historic Italian School, itisnot suggested that allvowels modify to the schwa (which does not “officially”exist in the Italian language), or to some other designated phoneme at a specified pitch below the secondo passaggio, nor even in those pitches that lie above i l That suggestion, however, is made in some other schools ol singing (Miller, 1977, pp. 137-141). Exercises in vowel modification can be useful only so long as the singer (along with Ihe teacher) has a concept of well-balanced, resonant sound, based on what actually happens when the vocal trad llIn tunc u nli l.uyngeal vowel definition while maintaining the presence ol the g in g e r 's formant. Vowel modification may well be the most subtle of alltechnical aspects in the teaching of singing. Perhaps because most singers in the early phases of study tend to err on the side of open singing without siilIh ient modification of the vowel, itisa pedagogical prob lem not to "close" the voice excessively. Open singing (lack of modification of vowels) in the upper voice is detrimental to vocal health. However, itis often overlooked that carrying the weight of the heavy mechanism into upper-middle or upper voice (under the assumption that such action modifies the vowel) isat least potentially as disastrous. Brodnitz warns against the hazards of excessive "covering”:"Covering has to be used with great care, because in its extreme form itishard on voices” (1953, p. 83). He states that the danger in heavy covering lies "in the greater ten sion of the outer laryngeal muscles as well as of the inner ones, both of which tense the cords.” When too much modification is expe rienced by the singer in the mounting scale, the reverse process of neutralization may be necessary: The vowel [u] tends toward [u], [o] toward [o], etc. Never should any form of vowel modification draw attention to itself("Watch me ‘ cover’this one!”) . In achieving proper modification of the vowels (aggiustamento), distinct advantages are to be gained by alternating neighboring vow