Module 2 Communication, Culture and Globalization: Learning Objective
Module 2 Communication, Culture and Globalization: Learning Objective
GLOBALIZATION
LEARNING OBJECTIVE
CONTENT
A. WHAT IS GLOBALIZATION?
2. Cultural Awareness in Speech. For example, when two people are speaking
the same language, cultural differences can affect vocabulary, colloquial
expressions, voice tone and taboo topics.
4. The Problem. Despite its quick spead and continuous development, global
communication has not reached the majority of people on all continents. The
WHO indicates that at leat 70 percent of all people in Africa will never make a
single phone cakk or use the internet. This points out the need of a more
extensive application of communication technologies as part of the process of
globalization.
SKILL BUILDER 5
Direction: Read the article below and write a reaction paper. It has to include a
summary of the article and your reaction to the work. If it is your first time writing a
reaction paper, kindly click this link https://bit.ly/3iKpZJc for tips on how to write one.
The Flight from Conversation
Sherry Turkle
WE live in a technological universe in which we are always communicating. And yet we have
sacrificed conversation for mere connection.
At home, families sit together, texting and reading e-mail. At work, executives text during
board meetings. We text (and shop and go on Facebook) during classes and when we’re on
dates. My students tell me about an important new skill: it involves maintaining eye contact
with someone while you text someone else; it’s hard, but it can be done.
Over the past 15 years, I’ve studied technologies of mobile connection and talked to
hundreds of people of all ages and circumstances about their plugged-in lives. I’ve learned
that the little devices most of us carry around are so powerful that they change not only what
we do, but also who we are.
We’ve become accustomed to a new way of being “alone together.” Technology-enabled,
we are able to be with one another, and also elsewhere, connected to wherever we want to
be. We want to customize our lives. We want to move in and out of where we are because
the thing we value most is control over where we focus our attention. We have gotten used
to the idea of being in a tribe of one, loyal to our own party.
Our colleagues want to go to that board meeting but pay attention only to what interests
them. To some this seems like a good idea, but we can end up hiding from one another,
even as we are constantly connected to one another.
A businessman laments that he no longer has colleagues at work. He doesn’t stop by to talk;
he doesn’t call. He says that he doesn’t want to interrupt them. He says they’re “too busy on
their e-mail.” But then he pauses and corrects himself. “I’m not telling the truth. I’m the one
who doesn’t want to be interrupted. I think I should. But I’d rather just do things on my
BlackBerry.”
A 16-year-old boy who relies on texting for almost everything says almost wistfully,
“Someday, someday, but certainly not now, I’d like to learn how to have a conversation.”
In today’s workplace, young people who have grown up fearing conversation show up on the
job wearing earphones. Walking through a college library or the campus of a high-tech start-
up, one sees the same thing: we are together, but each of us is in our own bubble, furiously
connected to keyboards and tiny touch screens. A senior partner at a Boston law firm
describes a scene in his office. Young associates lay out their suite of technologies: laptops,
iPods and multiple phones. And then they put their earphones on. “Big ones. Like pilots.
They turn their desks into cockpits.” With the young lawyers in their cockpits, the office is
quiet, a quiet that does not ask to be broken.
In the silence of connection, people are comforted by being in touch with a lot of people —
carefully kept at bay. We can’t get enough of one another if we can use technology to keep
one another at distances we can control: not too close, not too far, just right. I think of it as a
Goldilocks effect.
Texting and e-mail and posting let us present the self we want to be. This means we can
edit. And if we wish to, we can delete. Or retouch: the voice, the flesh, the face, the body.
Not too much, not too little — just right.
Human relationships are rich; they’re messy and demanding. We have learned the habit of
cleaning them up with technology. And the move from conversation to connection is part of
this. But it’s a process in which we shortchange ourselves. Worse, it seems that over time
we stop caring, we forget that there is a difference.
Deadline: _____________