0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views18 pages

Lec 7 - Professional Ethics - HU-222

The document discusses 4 case studies related to professional ethics: 1. A chemical company develops a new toxin not on the banned list that could cause cancer. 2. An engineer reimburses himself for a purchase against regulations. 3. An employer asks an engineer to design a unsafe bridge to save costs that could collapse. 4. An engineer uses pirated software against company privacy policies. The document analyzes each case in terms of legal, moral, and ethical implications and determines priorities like public safety over employment or not pirating software.

Uploaded by

manamana4141
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views18 pages

Lec 7 - Professional Ethics - HU-222

The document discusses 4 case studies related to professional ethics: 1. A chemical company develops a new toxin not on the banned list that could cause cancer. 2. An engineer reimburses himself for a purchase against regulations. 3. An employer asks an engineer to design a unsafe bridge to save costs that could collapse. 4. An engineer uses pirated software against company privacy policies. The document analyzes each case in terms of legal, moral, and ethical implications and determines priorities like public safety over employment or not pirating software.

Uploaded by

manamana4141
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

Professional Ethics

Dr. Shujaat Ali


Assistant Professor

Lecture 7

Department of Engineering Management (DEM) – NUST- CEME


Case Study 1: Non-listed Toxin
• A chemical company develops a new process that results
in some waste.
• Their internal studies show this waste can cause cancer.
• However, this type of waste is not on a government list
of banned chemicals because it is new.

What do you think?


• Legal ? Moral ? Ethical ?
Case Study 2: Reimbursed Payments
• Government self-regulations require that all purchases
be made through purchasing agents.
• An engineer wishes to purchase an old alternator from a
junkyard and does so with his own money.
• He reimburses himself with computer disks of equivalent
value.
What do you think?
• Legal ? Moral ?
Case study 3: Protecting the Safety of Society
• Your employer asks you to design a bridge that will not exceed $1
million to build. After doing a study you determine the following:
 An ideal bridge can be built for $1.5 million.
 Given the design constraints, a bridge built for $1 million will collapse in a moderate
earthquake.
• Your employer says, “if we don’t build the bridge for $1 million, then
we are going to have to fire half of the staff, including you.”*
• • He further asks you to go ahead with the next stage of the project.

What would you do?


What is the Conflict?
A. Your duty to your fellow employees vs. your duty to your
boss
B. Your duty to society vs. your loyalty to your own career
C. Uncertainty about the maximum magnitude of an
earthquake vs. the need to ensure a safe structure.
D. Your duty to be honest to clients vs. your duty to complete
the project .
What is more important?
• The conflict is between your future employment and the
employment of others in your company, and the welfare of society.

• The code of ethics for engineers requires You to take the safety of
society as being of “paramount importance”*.

• In a case like this the welfare of society comes first


Case Study 4: Software Privacy
• Junaid was showing Kashif a copy of a software package
he got from a friend.
• Kashif says, “this is great, but you didn’t pay for it, you
shouldn’t really be using it.”
• Junaid says, “Look, I can’t buy it because it is too
expensive, so the company hasn’t lost a sale. Besides I
didn’t take a physical object, so it isn’t stealing.”

What do you think?


Case Study: Software Privacy

• Junaid is right – there is no problem, he isn’t stealing


from the company?
• Junaid should delete the software from his computer?
• Junaid shouldn’t pirate software, but the company is not
going to find out, so he should not delete it?*
Discussion

You might also like