[Datadog] Fix Static Code Analysis violation

[whitemerch]

This pull request was automatically created by Datadog to fix this vulnerability.

It introduces a remediation for the AST vulnerability detected by rule python-security/avoid-random.

This change is intended to address the issue identified. Please review the suggested update before merging.

[github-actions]

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

ddtrace/vendor/dogstatsd/base.py                                        @DataDog/apm-core-python

[github-actions]

Bootstrap import analysis

Comparison of import times between this PR and base.

Summary

The average import time from this PR is: 239 ± 4 ms.

The average import time from base is: 241 ± 4 ms.

The import time difference between this PR and base is: -1.9 ± 0.2 ms.

Import time breakdown

The following import paths have shrunk:

ddtrace.auto 2.001 ms (0.84%)

ddtrace.bootstrap.sitecustomize 1.323 ms (0.55%)

ddtrace.bootstrap.preload 1.323 ms (0.55%)

ddtrace.internal.remoteconfig.client 0.653 ms (0.27%)

ddtrace 0.678 ms (0.28%)

ddtrace.internal._unpatched 0.022 ms (0.01%)

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-05-29 16:56:58

Comparing candidate commit 76f6908 in PR branch dd-static-analysis-cZmC2ln with baseline commit fc6b273 in branch main.

Found 2 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 508 metrics, 6 unstable metrics.

scenario:iastdjangostartup-appsec

• 🟩 execution_time [-1.096s; -0.997s] or [-55.370%; -50.377%]

scenario:iastdjangostartup-tracer

• 🟩 execution_time [-893.637ms; -803.012ms] or [-50.703%; -45.561%]

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically closed after a period of inactivity.
After this much time, it will likely be easier to open a new pull request with the
same changes than to update this one from the base branch. Please comment or reopen
if you think this pull request was closed in error.