-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
[Crashtracker] Use range-based datastructure to store modules #1250
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
BenchmarksComparisonBenchmark execution time: 2025-10-10 13:40:54 Comparing candidate commit ff244b9 in PR branch Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 53 metrics, 2 unstable metrics. CandidateCandidate benchmark detailsGroup 1
Group 2
Group 3
Group 4
Group 5
Group 6
Group 7
Group 8
Group 9
Group 10
Group 11
Group 12
Group 13
Group 14
Group 15
BaselineOmitted due to size. |
d41cb20
to
4250409
Compare
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1250 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 71.88% 71.90% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 356 356
Lines 56691 56691
==========================================
+ Hits 40750 40764 +14
+ Misses 15941 15927 -14
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
4250409
to
7062850
Compare
Artifact Size Benchmark Reportaarch64-alpine-linux-musl
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
libdatadog-x64-windows
libdatadog-x86-windows
x86_64-alpine-linux-musl
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
|
37be097
to
ff244b9
Compare
What does this PR do?
A brief description of the change being made with this pull request.
Motivation
What inspired you to submit this pull request?
Additional Notes
Anything else we should know when reviewing?
How to test the change?
Describe here in detail how the change can be validated.