Skip to content

Conversation

@maigovannon
Copy link

@maigovannon maigovannon commented Nov 3, 2025

Description

Creating Java25 doc samples for Cloud Run Functions and updating some of the existing ones to Java21. These are forked changes from #10193

Checklist

  • I have followed Sample Format Guide
  • pom.xml parent set to latest shared-configuration
  • Appropriate changes to README are included in PR
  • Tests pass: mvn clean verify required
  • Lint passes: mvn -P lint checkstyle:check required
  • Static Analysis: mvn -P lint clean compile pmd:cpd-check spotbugs:check advisory only

@maigovannon maigovannon requested review from a team and yoshi-approver as code owners November 3, 2025 11:38
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added samples Issues that are directly related to samples. api: cloudfunctions Issues related to the Cloud Run functions API. labels Nov 3, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @maigovannon, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the Java compiler version for several function samples from Java 11 to Java 21. The primary purpose is to modernize the build configurations for these samples, ensuring they leverage the latest LTS features and maintain compatibility with contemporary Java development environments. This update affects the helloworld and pubsub samples, bringing their pom.xml configurations up to date.

Highlights

  • Java Version Update: The maven.compiler.target and maven.compiler.source properties have been updated from Java 11 to Java 21 in the pom.xml files for the helloworld and pubsub function samples.
  • Sample Modernization: This change ensures that the specified function samples are compiled and run using the latest Long-Term Support (LTS) version of Java, aligning them with current development standards.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the Java compiler source and target versions from 11 to 21 for two function samples. The changes in the pom.xml files are correct. I've added a couple of suggestions to improve maintainability by using a property for the Java version, which is a common best practice in Maven projects. This will make future version updates simpler and less prone to error.

<functionTarget>functions.SubscribeToTopic</functionTarget>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I get why you would add this but I'm not sure we should be adding this to the sample code. We want to illustrate using the Google Cloud Run function with Pub/Sub with a minimal example. This feels like it's adding complexity.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was actually needed to make mvn clean verify work properly. Without this, it fails.

<properties>
<maven.compiler.target>11</maven.compiler.target>
<maven.compiler.source>11</maven.compiler.source>
<maven.compiler.target>21</maven.compiler.target>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We generally do not have samples for every run time in Functions. Java 11 is the minimum required runtime https://docs.cloud.google.com/run/docs/runtimes/java and that's why this is 11 currently. If y'all are thinking to move to latest supported (non-preview) that's fine, but it would be helpful to know that's the intent here. We should not have duplicate samples showing the basic usecase.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Java11 is actually no longer supoprted and was decommissioned on 10/31: https://docs.cloud.google.com/run/docs/runtime-support#java

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: cloudfunctions Issues related to the Cloud Run functions API. samples Issues that are directly related to samples.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants