-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.5k
[🚀 Feature]: [dotnet] [bidi] Avoid Modules
namespace
#15791
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@nvborisenko, thank you for creating this issue. We will troubleshoot it as soon as we can. Selenium Triage Team: remember to follow the Triage Guide |
@RenderMichael @YevgeniyShunevych this one is a breaking change (and it is fine while we are in beta phase). What do you think? Personally I feel we applied good patterns in
After:
I would like to simplify earlier rather than later (or never). |
I completely support reducing the number of namespaces, cutting off sub-namespaces. Grouping source files with folder structures is great, and it doesn't require each folder to have its own namespace, even though IDE builds such namespace by default. I often try to keep all types within a single project/library with the single namespace. It mostly has no sense to keep many namespaces within a single library. For WebDriver it would be good to keep all BiDi-related stuff within |
Also, for years I don't understand the .NET WebDriver project naming problem.
From my point of view, it would be great at some major release point to name all 3 things as |
Thanks Yevgeniy, at least 2 people agree what is better. I will do it. About naming, it is also confusing me. And also your proposed naming matches my expectation: |
Done, thanks guys. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Description
OpenQA.Selenum.BiDi
namespace:Have you considered any alternatives or workarounds?
What if we simplify Modules namespace? And move up?
Personally I don't expect files/folders will be increased.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: