⚡️ Speed up function extract_modified_files
by 57%
#44
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 57% (0.57x) speedup for
extract_modified_files
inevaluation/benchmarks/swe_bench/scripts/setup/compare_patch_filename.py
⏱️ Runtime :
749 microseconds
→478 microseconds
(best of946
runs)📝 Explanation and details
To optimize the
extract_modified_files
function for faster execution, especially when dealing with large patches, we can take the following steps.Here's the optimized version of the code.
Changes made:
str.startswith()
to determine lines of interest since the check for a constant prefix is more efficient.str.find
to locate the' b/'
as it avoids the overhead of regex groups and matches.This approach will be significantly faster due to the reduction of regex overhead, especially on large sets of data.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-extract_modified_files-m8wtvps0
and push.