Skip to content

Flow-insensitive value set: don't create index expressions over non-array objects #8651

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

When evaluating an index expression, the value set must ignore pointed-to objects that are neither arrays nor vectors. Any appearance of such objects should produce unknown instead. (Trying to create an index_exprt with neither an array nor a vector as root object will fail an invariant.)

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

…rray objects

When evaluating an index expression, the value set must ignore
pointed-to objects that are neither arrays nor vectors. Any appearance
of such objects should produce `unknown` instead. (Trying to create an
`index_exprt` with neither an array nor a vector as root object will
fail an invariant.)
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.36%. Comparing base (beb96b9) to head (0efab54).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #8651      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    80.36%   80.36%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files         1686     1686              
  Lines       206938   206940       +2     
  Branches        73       73              
===========================================
- Hits        166304   166303       -1     
- Misses       40634    40637       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants