Skip to content

8355379: Annotate lazy fields in java.security @Stable #25405

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

koushikthirupattur
Copy link
Contributor

@koushikthirupattur koushikthirupattur commented May 23, 2025

Several classes in the java.security package lazily compute their hash value and store it in a field. These fields can typically be annotated with the @Stable annotation. Many of the current implementations are using -1 as a flag for not computed, this needs to be refactored away.

Here are some examples of such classes: PKCS12Attribute, Timestamp, Certificate, and URICertStoreParameters.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8355379: Annotate lazy fields in java.security @Stable (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25405/head:pull/25405
$ git checkout pull/25405

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25405
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25405/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25405

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25405

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25405.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 23, 2025

👋 Welcome back koushikthirupattur! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 23, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 23, 2025

@koushikthirupattur The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@koushikthirupattur koushikthirupattur marked this pull request as ready for review June 4, 2025 04:23
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 4, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 4, 2025

Webrevs

@minborg
Copy link
Contributor

minborg commented Jun 4, 2025

I think we should add tests that seralizes/deserializes objects several times to make sure the hash code works as expected here.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 2, 2025

@koushikthirupattur This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rfr Pull request is ready for review security [email protected]
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants