Skip to content

8345347: Test runtime/cds/TestDefaultArchiveLoading.java should accept VM flags or be marked as flagless #25591

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

matias9927
Copy link
Contributor

@matias9927 matias9927 commented Jun 2, 2025

Currently this test uses ProcessTools.createLimitedTestJavaProcessBuilder() to ignore vm flags, so this patch changes the method to ProcessTools.createTestJavaProcessBuilder() to allow for more extensive training. Because ZGC is incompatible with heap dumping, is is disabled on this test. Verified locally and through tiered testing.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8345347: Test runtime/cds/TestDefaultArchiveLoading.java should accept VM flags or be marked as flagless (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25591/head:pull/25591
$ git checkout pull/25591

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25591
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25591/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25591

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25591

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25591.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 2, 2025

👋 Welcome back matsaave! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 2, 2025

@matias9927 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8345347: Test runtime/cds/TestDefaultArchiveLoading.java should accept VM flags or be marked as flagless

Reviewed-by: lmesnik, stefank, ccheung

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 86 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 2, 2025

@matias9927 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@matias9927 matias9927 marked this pull request as ready for review June 2, 2025 15:07
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 2, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 2, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@stefank stefank left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We already have this property that is used for some tests:

@requires vm.cds.write.archived.java.heap

Should this be used here instead of explicitly excluding ZGC?

This property boils down to:

// If an incompatible VM options is found, return a text message that explains why
static const char* check_options_incompatible_with_dumping_heap() {
#if INCLUDE_CDS_JAVA_HEAP
  if (!UseCompressedClassPointers) {
    return "UseCompressedClassPointers must be true";
  }

  // Almost all GCs support heap region dump, except ZGC (so far).
  if (UseZGC) {
    return "ZGC is not supported";
  }

  return nullptr;
#else
  return "JVM not configured for writing Java heap objects";
#endif
}

@matias9927
Copy link
Contributor Author

We already have this property that is used for some tests:

@requires vm.cds.write.archived.java.heap

Should this be used here instead of explicitly excluding ZGC?

This property boils down to:

// If an incompatible VM options is found, return a text message that explains why
static const char* check_options_incompatible_with_dumping_heap() {
#if INCLUDE_CDS_JAVA_HEAP
  if (!UseCompressedClassPointers) {
    return "UseCompressedClassPointers must be true";
  }

  // Almost all GCs support heap region dump, except ZGC (so far).
  if (UseZGC) {
    return "ZGC is not supported";
  }

  return nullptr;
#else
  return "JVM not configured for writing Java heap objects";
#endif
}

I forgot this existed, thanks for pointing it out!

Copy link
Member

@calvinccheung calvinccheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 2, 2025
Copy link
Member

@stefank stefank left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
* @test id=nocoops_nocoh
* @summary Test Loading of default archives in all configurations
* @requires vm.cds
* @requires vm.cds.write.archived.java.heap
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we update the copyright year from 2024 to 2024, 2025

Copy link
Contributor Author

@matias9927 matias9927 Jun 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do I need to update the Red Hat copyright as well?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe not need I think

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 3, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 3, 2025
@matias9927
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for the reviews @sendaoYan, @lmesnik, @calvinccheung, and @stefank!
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 4, 2025

Going to push as commit a2723d9.
Since your change was applied there have been 120 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 4, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 4, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 4, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 4, 2025

@matias9927 Pushed as commit a2723d9.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants