Skip to content

8358158: test/jdk/java/io/Console/CharsetTest.java failing with NoClassDefFoundError: jtreg/SkippedException #25601

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

naotoj
Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj commented Jun 2, 2025

Fixing a regression caused by the fix to JDK-8356985. Although the fix in CharsetTest was a clean-up and not the gist of the original issue, the change seem to have caused not finding SkippedException at runtime in certain cases. Changing the test to JUnit based so that the offending SkippedException can be replaced with JUnit's Assumptions. Also renamed the test case itself to reflect what's actually tested in it.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8358158: test/jdk/java/io/Console/CharsetTest.java failing with NoClassDefFoundError: jtreg/SkippedException (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25601/head:pull/25601
$ git checkout pull/25601

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25601
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25601/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25601

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25601

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25601.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 2, 2025

👋 Welcome back naoto! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 2, 2025

@naotoj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8358158: test/jdk/java/io/Console/CharsetTest.java failing with NoClassDefFoundError: jtreg/SkippedException

Reviewed-by: joehw, jlu, iris

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 83 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 2, 2025

@naotoj The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@naotoj naotoj marked this pull request as ready for review June 2, 2025 22:46
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 2, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 2, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 3, 2025
* @summary Tests if "stdout.encoding" property is reflected in
* Console.charset() method. "expect" command in Windows/Cygwin
* does not work as expected. Ignoring tests on Windows.
* @requires (os.family == "linux") | (os.family == "mac")
Copy link
Member

@sendaoYan sendaoYan Jun 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The previous line say Ignoring tests on Windows., so this line maybe set as

@requires os.family != "windows"

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is true that the intention is to exclude testing on Windows. However, I would like to keep the testing on the platforms which are guaranteed to work, as the test relies on the behavior of the platforms' executable.

var eval = output.getExitValue();
if (eval != 0) {
throw new RuntimeException("Test failed. Exit value from 'expect' command: " + eval);
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion: assertEquals(0, eval, "exit value");

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. I replaced it (and other locations applicable) with OutputAnalyzer.shouldHaveExitValue()

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 3, 2025
Copy link
Member

@justin-curtis-lu justin-curtis-lu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Swapping the jtreg.SkippedException with Assumptions looks good, and we would expect no problems since StdinEncodingTest.java has been passing with a similar Assumptions set up. LGTM.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 3, 2025
@naotoj
Copy link
Member Author

naotoj commented Jun 3, 2025

Thanks for the reviews!
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 3, 2025

Going to push as commit 9c74d54.
Since your change was applied there have been 92 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 3, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 3, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 3, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 3, 2025

@naotoj Pushed as commit 9c74d54.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants