-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
8357822: C2: Multiple string optimization tests are no longer testing string concatenation optimizations #25610
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back dskantz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@danielogh This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 110 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@danielogh The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@danielogh Thanks for looking into this and finding more tests!
Looks reasonable to me. I'm not super familiar with string optimizations, so it would be good if a second reviewer knew a little more. But it looks at least like a good step in the right direction from what I can see :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need to add a second run at all to this test case? As far as I can see, all concat*
test cases use explicit string builders and already exercise C2's string concatenation optimizations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for checking! I reverted the change to this test as on a second look the benefits of adding the new configuration to it are modest and out of scope.
Co-authored-by: Emanuel Peter <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Thanks for the reviews and suggestions! |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 6c616c7.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@danielogh Pushed as commit 6c616c7. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This PR updates a few tests to reintroduce testing of string concatenation optimizations since a few bugs have recently been identified in this area.
Selection criteria: performed a text search on the test suite and identified tests for string concatenations or string optimizations that are not currently compiled with
-XDstringConcat=inline
and are not using StringBuilders explicitly.Testing: T1-4.
Extra testing: ran the tests manually with
-XX:+PrintOptimizeStringConcat
and verified that the tests are exercising string optimizations after the fix.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25610/head:pull/25610
$ git checkout pull/25610
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25610
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25610/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25610
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25610
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25610.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment