-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
[WIP] Handle unserialize() failures gracefully #198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #198 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 82.2% 81.31% -0.9%
+ Complexity 601 567 -34
===========================================
Files 33 28 -5
Lines 1540 1450 -90
===========================================
- Hits 1266 1179 -87
+ Misses 274 271 -3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Nyholm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome. Good work!
Let me know when you are done with this PR.
|
I do, as always :D |
test doc
|
I think this may be an important PR. |
|
Due to changes in interests, I will be closing this PR after several years. |
|
Shame this PR was dropped - I see e.g.
when there's a cache miss |
|
see also #277 |
Description
errors triggered by unserialize should be turned to cache misses.
TODO