Skip to content

Fasttable: use preserve_none calling convention. #22068

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 2, 2025

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link

Fasttable: use preserve_none calling convention.

Subsequent CLs will handle repeated fields which require more local state, and will therefore benefit from the extra registers available when preserve_none is used.

Subsequent CLs will handle repeated fields which require more local state, and will therefore benefit from the extra registers  available when `preserve_none` is used.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 766304051
@copybara-service copybara-service bot merged commit 52bb218 into main Jun 2, 2025
@copybara-service copybara-service bot deleted the test_765879343 branch June 2, 2025 19:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant