Add initial Seeed's Arch BLE variant

[movingfox]

Modified based on RedBearLab's nRF51822

[sandeepmistry]

Do you have a link to more info on the board? Can you please add it to the read me?

If it's this board, I think the pin outs are incorrect: http://wiki.seeed.cc/Arch_BLE/

Should be 7 - 15, 23 - 29 here.

[sandeepmistry]

Are you sure it's the xxac variant?

[movingfox]

Hi,

It's the same board. But I followed pinouts of the schematics PDF on the
same wiki page.

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SeeedDocument/Arch_BLE/master/res/Arch_BLE_v1.0_pdf.pdf

Didn't notice the wiki's board picture doesn't meet the schematics. Would
check the phsical board later to see which one is correct.

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Sandeep Mistry [email protected]
wrote:

@sandeepmistry requested changes on this pull request.

In variants/Arch_BLE/variant.cpp
#53 (review)
:

• 8,
• 9,
• 10,
• 11,
• 12,
• 13,
• 17,

• // D8 - D13
• 18,
• 23,
• 24,
• 25,
• 28,
• 29,

Do you have a link to more info on the board? Can you please add it to the
read me?

If it's this board, I think the pin outs are incorrect:
http://wiki.seeed.cc/Arch_BLE/

Should be 7 - 15, 23 - 29 here.

In boards.txt
#53 (review)
:

+Arch_BLE.upload.interface=cmsisdap
+Arch_BLE.upload.target=nrf51
+Arch_BLE.upload.maximum_size=262144
+
+Arch_BLE.bootloader.tool=sandeepmistry:openocd
+
+Arch_BLE.build.mcu=cortex-m0
+Arch_BLE.build.f_cpu=16000000
+Arch_BLE.build.board=ARCH_BLE
+Arch_BLE.build.core=nRF5
+Arch_BLE.build.variant=Arch_BLE
+Arch_BLE.build.variant_system_lib=
+Arch_BLE.build.extra_flags=-DNRF51
+Arch_BLE.build.float_flags=
+Arch_BLE.build.ldscript=nrf51_xxaa.ld
+

Are you sure it's the xxac variant?

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#53 (review),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQcAOEQUm3LX3slXBT2sK6j4JTR0z9Xks5q7k3ugaJpZM4Kqei1
.

[sandeepmistry]

@movingfox

Would check the phsical board later to see which one is correct.

Thanks, let me know when you've verified what is correct.

[movingfox]

Found an official picture of the physical board here.

It seems that the schematics PDF matches the physical board. But I indeed mistook P16 as AREF. It should be P0 actually.

[sandeepmistry]

ok, let me know when you've made the adjustments and tested the pin mapping on a physical board.

[sandeepmistry]

@movingfox any progress on this?

[sandeepmistry]

Closing this for now, due to lack of activity ... please re-open once tested etc.