Skip to content

boards: nordic: add runner config qualifiers for 54h20 'iron' variants #90868

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

jonathannilsen
Copy link
Contributor

Make it so the 54h20 'iron' variants have the same flashing behavior as the other 54h20 targets.

@@ -126,7 +126,9 @@ runners:
- nrf54l20/cpuflpr
- qualifiers:
- nrf54h20/cpuapp
- nrf54h20/cpuapp/iron
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

board qualifiers are not allowed in a soc file, put it in the board.yml file

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jonathannilsen jonathannilsen changed the title soc: nordic: add runner config qualifiers for 54h20 'iron' variants boards: nordic: add runner config qualifiers for 54h20 'iron' variants Jun 4, 2025
run: first
groups:
- boards:
- [email protected]/nrf54h20/cpuapp/iron
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you will need to add the other ones from the base soc.yml file or they will vanish because of this

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see, do they need to be added both with and without the 0.9.0 revision as well?

Make it so the 54h20 'iron' variants have the same flashing
behavior as the other 54h20 targets.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nilsen <[email protected]>
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jun 4, 2025

@jonathannilsen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing, will be invalidated by #91413

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
platform: nRF Nordic nRFx
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants