Re: [RFC] OOP API for cURL extension

From: Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:09:32 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] OOP API for cURL extension
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On 15 February 2024 15:44:13 GMT, Sara Golemon <[email protected]> wrote:
>* CurlHandle::exec() mixed typing of return values.
>  Comment: Agreed.  The true return value becomes meaningless in the
>RETURNTRANSFER==false case.
>  Proposal: Update the RFC for CurlHandle::execute() to return ?string.

Should we take this a step further, and remove CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER as a valid option on the
object completely? Instead of an overloaded exec() method, provide:

public function executeAndReturn(): string
public function executeAndOutput(): void

Perhaps the option could be accepted in the relevant setOpt methods, but issue a warning that it has
no effect.

Since both the default for the option and the name of the method are changing anyway, I don't
think this significantly affects the migration effort for the tiny minority of cases where you
actually want the direct output behaviour.

Regards,

-- 
Rowan Tommins
[IMSoP]


Thread (21 messages)

« previous php.internals (#122397) next »