Re: [Discussion] Implicitly backed enums

From:	Tim Düsterhus	Date:	Sat, 25 May 2024 09:09:01 +0000
Subject:	Re: [Discussion] Implicitly backed enums
References:	1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10	Groups:	php.internals
Request:	Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message

Hi

On 5/23/24 20:57, Bilge wrote:
Fair enough; I think we've somewhat moved on from the initial suggestion
of implicitly backed enums, towards implicit values for string enums
(for those names without explicitly defined values). What is your
opinion on this alternative approach?

Generally not a fan of implicit. I like my code to be easy to read and reason about, not easy to write (and hard to read).

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus


   

Thread (21 messages)

• BilgeTue, 21 May 2024 22:30:23 +0000
  • Larry GarfieldTue, 21 May 2024 22:35:47 +0000
    • BilgeTue, 21 May 2024 22:48:47 +0000Re: [Discussion] Implicitly backed enums
      • mjecTue, 21 May 2024 23:24:25 +0000
      • Larry GarfieldTue, 21 May 2024 23:31:14 +0000
        • BilgeTue, 21 May 2024 23:47:42 +0000
          • Larry GarfieldWed, 22 May 2024 00:45:55 +0000
            • Stephen ReayWed, 22 May 2024 02:29:45 +0000
              • Larry GarfieldWed, 22 May 2024 20:46:22 +0000
                • Stephen ReayThu, 23 May 2024 00:30:40 +0000
                  • Larry GarfieldThu, 23 May 2024 12:58:24 +0000
            • Robert LandersThu, 23 May 2024 06:35:09 +0000
              • Larry GarfieldThu, 23 May 2024 13:03:21 +0000
          • Aaron PiotrowskiWed, 22 May 2024 00:48:00 +0000
            • Tim DüsterhusThu, 23 May 2024 18:20:00 +0000
              • Aaron PiotrowskiThu, 23 May 2024 18:34:28 +0000
                • Tim DüsterhusThu, 23 May 2024 18:48:41 +0000
                  • BilgeThu, 23 May 2024 18:57:56 +0000
                    • Tim DüsterhusSat, 25 May 2024 09:09:01 +0000
        • Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]Thu, 23 May 2024 10:38:21 +0000
        • Tim DüsterhusThu, 23 May 2024 18:11:42 +0000