Re: [RFC] Operator Overrides -- Lite Edition

From: Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:56:43 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Operator Overrides -- Lite Edition
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024, at 17:37, Ben Ramsey wrote:
> > On Jun 29, 2024, at 10:16, Larry Garfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > For clarity (since I know from experience it's helpful to RFC authors to have a
> > concrete sense of votes in advance): I will be voting No on this RFC.  As both Jordan and Saki have
> > explained, it's a hideous hack that doesn't look like it would even work, much less be
> > wise.  I'd much rather take a second swing at Jordan's original operator overloading RFC,
> > which I supported and still support.  Let's do it right.
> 
> 
> I agree with Larry that I would rather take another look at an overall operator overloading RFC
> than to implement this in one specific extension.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ben
> 

Thank you Larry and Ben, I appreciate it. Out of curiosity, do you consider ArrayAccess and
Stringable a hideous hack too?

— Rob


Thread (27 messages)

« previous php.internals (#124056) next »