Re: [RFC] Static class

From: Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 07:42:19 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Static class
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message 
On 08/07/2024 01:16, Mike Schinkel wrote:



    Congrats on getting it to this point.


Thanks. It's been an adventure :^)



    I support this in all but the RFC's restriction on abstract, as
    I have previously mentioned on the list.


I must have missed a key point here. Let's suppose we're writing a follow-up RFC to permit static and abstract together. In as few sentences as possible, what is the benefit conferred to the developer?


Cheers,
Bilge

Thread (71 messages)

« previous php.internals (#124279) next »