Re: Updates needed to various RFCs
On 11/08/2024 17:55, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
On a general note, the whole administrative part of the RFC process
feels like we're stuck in the 20th century. For instance, to start the
vote, you are supposed to:
* update the RFC page to "voting" status
* add the doodle voting macro
* add the voting start and end dates to the text of the RFC
* move the RFC to "voting" on the RFC overview page
* send an email to the ML announcing the start of voting
Wut? Might as well ask me to send a punched card to someone.
Well yes, but, you'd need programmers to automate something like that. And I don't know anyone like that.
Thread (11 messages)