On 25/08/2024 23:31, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
It doesn't, unfortunately, persuade me that the behaviour proposed is sensible.
It should. But since it has apparently failed in that regard, I suggest you take me up on my challenge to implement the grammar you want with a patch and you will quickly convince yourself one way or the other. The truth doesn't exist in my head or yours, nor on this mailing list. The truth always lies in the code, which is why RFC authors are strongly encouraged to pursue patches where there is doubt, and similarly, I think counter-proposals on the mailing list should follow suit, otherwise we can find ourselves arguing over nothing.
Kind regards, Bilge