Re: [RFC] Static Constructor

From:	Bilge	Date:	Tue, 27 Aug 2024 21:51:52 +0000
Subject:	Re: [RFC] Static Constructor
References:	1 2 3 4	Groups:	php.internals
Request:	Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message

On 19/06/2024 19:25, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Hi

On 6/19/24 16:03, Erick de Azevedo Lima wrote:
I have considered some names, actually. I just chose this one for the
implementation because
I tried to design it to be as close as possible to the C# implementation
and they call it "static constructor".
But the name can be changed to another one without any problem at all.

I would suggest __constructStatic(). This matches the existing naming pattern of __callStatic() being the companion to __call().

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus

Why can't it just be public static function __construct()?

Cheers,
Bilge


   

Thread (16 messages)

• Erick de Azevedo LimaWed, 19 Jun 2024 12:33:55 +0000
  • Michał Marcin BrzuchalskiWed, 19 Jun 2024 13:07:09 +0000
    • Erick de Azevedo LimaWed, 19 Jun 2024 14:03:57 +0000
      • Tim DüsterhusWed, 19 Jun 2024 18:25:34 +0000
        • BilgeTue, 27 Aug 2024 21:51:52 +0000
          • MorganWed, 28 Aug 2024 01:29:13 +0000
            • Erick de Azevedo LimaWed, 28 Aug 2024 09:34:49 +0000
  • Larry GarfieldWed, 19 Jun 2024 15:29:37 +0000
  • Ilija ToviloWed, 19 Jun 2024 18:36:00 +0000
    • Mike SchinkelWed, 19 Jun 2024 21:55:18 +0000
      • LynnThu, 20 Jun 2024 08:57:09 +0000
      • Erick de Azevedo LimaThu, 20 Jun 2024 13:01:06 +0000
        • Mike SchinkelThu, 20 Jun 2024 18:38:57 +0000
  • Jorg SowaThu, 20 Jun 2024 14:24:32 +0000
  • Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]Thu, 20 Jun 2024 20:07:34 +0000