Re: RFC: Single-Expression functions
I've changed the structure, followed the rfc template now.
The voting section isn't available now, because the RFC is under discussion..
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 10:58 PM Dmitry Derepko <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Tim for the answer.
>
> Your replies went to the Spam folder. I don't know why.
>
> I'll change the template as you suggested as soon as possible.
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 1:11 PM Tim Düsterhus <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 2025-05-27 09:08, schrieb Dmitry Derepko:
>> > As Tim said, it needs at least a 2 week discussion period.
>> >
>> >
>> > Could you share the reference?
>>
>> I already did in my email: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto (“When
>> discussion ends, and a minimum period of two weeks has passed”).
>>
>> > Here it is. I've added the link to the RFC.
>> >
>>
>> It took me a while to find the link in the “References” section, because
>> that's not where I expected it based on other RFCs. Overall the RFC
>> diverges from the RFC template quite a bit. As an example, the “RFC
>> Impact” section is entirely missing. The “Voting Choices” section is as
>> well. The “Metadata” section at the top is formatted differently for no
>> reason (and still indicates that the RFC is a Draft). As far as I can
>> tell it's also not listed in the RFC overview at
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc either.
>>
>> As a first-time RFC author, I would recommend you strictly following the
>> template and the “RFC How-To” to make sure that the RFC is complete and
>> follows proper process.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Tim Düsterhus
>>
>
>
> --
> Dmitriy Derepko
>
--
Best regards,
Dmitrii Derepko.
@xepozz
Thread (13 messages)