Re: True labelled breaks

From: Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:57:41 +0000
Subject: Re: True labelled breaks
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Steph Fox wrote:

> > > Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> > > > Wez Furlong wrote:
> > > > > I think not many people use it because it's difficult to use.
> > > > > Having real labels might change that.
> > > > > Personally, I'd prefer real goto, as I've stated in the past.
> > > > > Just for the record again, I'm +1 for goto, and +0.5 for labelled
> > > > > breaks only if we've totally given up on goto.
> > > >
> > > > FULLACK
> > >
> > > +1
> >
> > Same here, +1 on full goto. And if not then the PDM result. Labelled
> > breaks are inadequate IMO.
> 
> One more time: labelled breaks weren't offered as an _alternative_ to goto.
> Why are you bringing this to the forum now?

I am replying to the thread? Is that an offensive or something?

Derick


Thread (30 messages)

« previous php.internals (#21971) next »