On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 11:03:48 +0300
[email protected] ("Dmitry Stogov") wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The solution (2) - "goto only" is the winner.
> So in case of no serious objections, I'll commit the "goto.diff"
> patch in 24 hour.
>
> The last question:
> What do you thin about Andi's solution about using "jump" instead of
> "goto"?
>
> It may make sense, because it is not a full analog of C's goto
> statement. It is a limited "goto". It allows jump back and forward,
> but not INTO loops and switch statements.
+1 to commit the damned thing as it was proposed, goto (2). Everyone
will look at goto, not jump (unless you use asm and then you need jmp :)
--Pierre