Re: Final version, RFC release process

From: Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:03:40 +0000
Subject: Re: Final version, RFC release process
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Peter Lind <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 12:40, Pierre Joye <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> *snip*
>
>>
>> No, it is the same that what we proposed. What we proposed is that
>> every release is actually a LTS release. What Ubuntu uses works fine
>> for distros given that it is a distro with an insane amount of totally
>> unrelated projects they distribute, and alternative repositories exist
>> for almost each of them.
>>
>> For a programming language, it is a totally different story.
>>
>
> That makes more sense - you were, however, arguing against random LTS
> releases which was rather confusing (there's a big difference between
> "every release is an LTS" and "all LTS releases are random" - those
> are not the only options).

The randomness is about which release-features tuples would become a
LTS, that's something that can't apply well to a project like php.

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org


Thread (38 messages)

« previous php.internals (#52754) next »