Re: Bundling "modern" extensions

From: Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 13:10:10 +0000
Subject: Re: Bundling "modern" extensions
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message


Am 07.06.2011 15:08, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Reindl Harald <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> Am 07.06.2011 14:44, schrieb David Muir:
>>> On 07/06/11 18:40, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>> there is a reason for example to disallow many functions
>>>> on a webserver - so every API has to make sure they
>>>> can not be bypassed
>>>>
>>>> "because we can" is no valid reason for everything because
>>>> we can install binary extension as they exist now and
>>>> if you can not you are missing the permissions for some
>>>> good reasons
>>>>
>>>
>>> So you're saying that PECL, PNI or FFI should should be actively
>>> discouraged because of security concerns?
>>
>> WHERE i said this?
>> PECL-Extensions can NOT be enabled by the user
>>
>>
> except if dl is enabled of course.

i think nobody out there will enable this and hope such
crazy things are not enabled by default!



Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc

Thread (74 messages)

« previous php.internals (#53136) next »