On 08.06.2011, at 00:38, dukeofgaming wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 2011-06-07, dukeofgaming <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for "callable", it is really more consistent.
>>
>> I was actually agreeing With David and Stas that "callback" was more
>> consistent, and casting my vote for that.
>
> Oh. But then, shouldn't is_callable be deprecated for a more consistently
> named is_callback?
No, because is_callable() also performs visibility checks.
Which of course begs the question... should the type hint do the same?
David
Attachment: [application/pkcs7-signature] smime.p7s