Re: Re: drop bison 1.x?
it seems fedora had never bison 1.x
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1084
Am 02.09.2011 01:23, schrieb Pierre Joye:
> It would be nice to get at least a little bit of the context before going in
> any kind of arguing.
>
> For one the failing test happening after my commit was my mistake. It has
> nothing to do with the bison versions but me having committed a wrong
> expectf expression. However, the 1.x support was the reason why I made this
> change. Instead of making it right I've updated my boxes with bison 2.x.
> Lazy and better.1
>
> That being cleared, anyone using 1.x will have noticed that the tests did
> not pass. Fact is that it looks like I am the only tester using 2.x. Do you
> have any example of supported systems still having only bison 1.x support?
>
> Also 1.x is 13 years old, I would very surprised to see anyone still using
> such an old system with 5.3.
>
> Now, as stated earlier, my testing hosts do not have 1.x anymore and I won't
> care about it anymore either. So basically nobody here takes care if it
> anymore but let claim we do :)
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
Thread (17 messages)