Re: pecl, zts, non-zts, fastcgi and Apache

From: Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:05:53 +0000
Subject: Re: pecl, zts, non-zts, fastcgi and Apache
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:41 AM, jpauli <[email protected]> wrote:

> Actually, the true story for performance is to kill Apache and let Lighttpd
> or NginX do the job, with a pool of fcgi/fpm PHP processes

I'd like to ask you whether it really makes much difference to use
Lighttpd or NginX as opposed to Apache with the worker thread MPM, but
at that point we are officially way off topic (:

I think that in terms of general architecture, and in terms of what to
do with PHP, those three options are basically the same option.

I haven't studied FPM yet as I haven't felt a need for its advertised
advantages over the traditional FastCGI support in the CGI SAPI yet.

I will check out the apache worker and PHP article, thanks.

-- 
Tom Boutell
P'unk Avenue
215 755 1330
punkave.com
window.punkave.com


Thread (29 messages)

« previous php.internals (#58251) next »