Re: consider reverting E_ALL with E_STRICT
Am 06.03.2012 17:22, schrieb Gustavo Lopes:
> On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:08:07 +0100, Alan Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> However with E_STRICT included we have to run around and find all the code, and change it
>> to stuff like this:
>>
>> error_reporting(E_ALL & E_STRICT ? E_ALL ^ E_STRICT : E_ALL);
>>
>> Could we please revert that, and if people want an all encompasing error mode, call it
>> E_ANAL, like it was
>> supposed to be...
>
> Whatever the merits, this change was discussed and approved unanimously with 58 votes in favor
> (see
> https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54/vote ).
> There would have to be a very compelling reason to revert this change, especially in a minor
> version.
there is no single reason to revert this bugfix
the bugs were in PHP < 5.4 where ALL WAS NOT ALL which is not really smart
the word ALL has a very clear definition
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
Thread (14 messages)