On 2012-04-17, Stas Malyshev <[email protected]> wrote:
> > May I suggest using foo::__CLASS__ instead of foo::class ? It's longer, but
> > closer to what already exists for this semantic (class name as string),
> > don't you think ?
>
> I like this. __CLASS__ is already being used as class name, and little
> chance of colliding with some code since you're not supposed to be using
> __ prefix in your names.
"class" won't collide anyways, as it's already a keyword, and you can't use
it
in your constant or function names. __CLASS__ has bad connotations for me, as it
resolves to the declaring class normally, not the class invoked.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Project Lead | [email protected]
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
PGP key: http://framework.zend.com/zf-matthew-pgp-key.asc