Re: Implicit isset in ternary operator

From: Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:23:59 +0000
Subject: Re: Implicit isset in ternary operator
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Anthony Ferrara <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> Does this seem like a possible improvement we can work on? Anyone
>> interested in championing the change?
>>
>
> I like it in principle. My only concern is *why* wasn't it done this way
> in the first place... Is there a reason?
>
>
I don't recall correctly, there was a thread on this by David Coalier some
time ago, but it went completely off course and i remember BC breaks were
part of the reason. I think we have a good plan for BC breaks now, so why
not rethink this.


> Anthony
>
>


-- 
Rafael Dohms
PHP Evangelist and Community Leader
http://www.rafaeldohms.com.br
http://www.phpsp.org.br


Thread (31 messages)

« previous php.internals (#61396) next »