hi,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe we could introduce a new namespace for the new api instead of turning
> the new api oop only (or using objects for groupping static stateless
> functions into objects only to hint that they are working with the same
> variable types).
>
> Combining this with the previously mentioned lets turn namespaces to first
> class citizens and allowing exporting whole namespaces to the current scope
> would make it possible to make the new api available in the global scope if
> needed.
> Ofc this still would be a huge task to rethink/reshape our current api.
This falls almost exactly to what I would avoid to do, having same set
of functions but with new names or signatures, under a separate
namespace.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org