On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Andrew Faulds <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmm. This is just a quick thought:
>
> Considering the yield syntax will vary about needing () round it, why not
> make it a "fake" function (language construct).
>
> This way it's consistent: yield(), yield($v), yield($k => $v), $a = yield(),
> etc.
>
> (yield $x) is just messy as an expression. We don't have (isset $x), we have
> isset($x).
There are two reasons why I would not choose that syntax:
1. This would make "yield" look like a functions, without actually
being a function. PHP has done this in the past quite often and I
think it was a mistake. It is the reason why people try to write
empty(someCall()). It looks like a function, so they expect it to
behave like one. Similarly you also can't do $f = 'empty'; $f($foo),
which again is confusing to people new to the language.
2. Other languages that implement generators also use the "yield $foo"
syntax (and also have the same parentheses requirements). So this
makes PHP consistent with them.
Nikita