On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Derick Rethans <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I went for DateTimePoint. Point as in "Point in time". I am not too
> happy with the name, but I think it works better than DateTimeImmutable
> as that just sounds quircky. I'm still fixing up a few things and adding
> some test cases. I think I need to make it work with DatePeriod too -
> but I haven't looked at that yet.
some suggestions:
DateTimeValue
DateTimeImmutable
DateImmutable
DateFixed
DateStatic
(and as a bonus: DateTime2)