Re: Property Accessors 1.2 for Final Review before Vote

From: Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:41:02 +0000
Subject: Re: Property Accessors 1.2 for Final Review before Vote
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message 
On 1/2/13 6:36 AM, Clint Priest wrote:

Here is the updated RFC incorporating the feedback from previous rounds of discussion.

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-v1.2


The RFC does not specify whether it's a fatal error to define a class (directly or via extends/traits) which has both a traditional property and accessor with the same name, but I think this should be prohibited to avoid confusion.

One might expect this to work if the traditional property is private in a parent class, but I think even if the patch allowed that special case (I've not tried it), it should not.

Steve Clay
-- 
http://www.mrclay.org/

Thread (52 messages)

« previous php.internals (#64481) next »