Re: Was Reflection annotations reader - We Need A Vision

From: Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:31:43 +0000
Subject: Re: Was Reflection annotations reader - We Need A Vision
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Adam Harvey <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> So my dilemma is this: how do I voice this (without simply a drive-by
> -1 vote, which isn't really helpful either, and is overly discouraging
> to the people who've put a lot of work in to polish the feature up)
> without being shouted down for being unhelpful or uncivil?
>
>
In my humble opinion, if your only "argument" is a -1, the don't be part of
the discussion, but
rather be a vote when (and if) the RFC goes to a vote.

There are 2 moments to express yourself: the discussion, the vote.

In the discussion phase I believe opinion should be expressed with solid
concerns. Performance issues, bad syntax, is it relevant or not, etc.
A simple "i don't like it" does not add, so it can be ommited.

The voting is where you can simply say: i don't want this regardless of the
syntax
intent or how many unicorns it provides.

That is what i do.


-- 
Rafael Dohms
PHP Evangelist and Community Leader
http://doh.ms
http://wwwamsterdamphp.nl


Thread (47 messages)

« previous php.internals (#64805) next »