Re: strtr vs. str_replace runtime

From:	Stas Malyshev	Date:	Tue, 15 Jan 2013 05:30:07 +0000
Subject:	Re: strtr vs. str_replace runtime
References:	1 2 3 4	Groups:	php.internals
Request:	Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message

Hi!

> OK, so now the plan is to merge this onto 5.4:
> 
> https://github.com/cataphract/php-src/compare/php:PHP-5.4...cataphract:strtr_wu94_54

This one looks mostly harmless, so if all strtr tests still pass I think
it's OK for 5.4.

-- 
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227


   

Thread (11 messages)

• Nicolai ScheerWed, 02 Jan 2013 15:53:57 +0000
  • Gustavo LopesThu, 03 Jan 2013 10:40:31 +0000Re: strtr vs. str replace runtime
    • Nicolai ScheerThu, 03 Jan 2013 14:37:45 +0000Re: strtr vs. str_replace runtime
    • Gustavo LopesWed, 09 Jan 2013 22:45:03 +0000Re: strtr vs. str_replace runtime
      • Nicolai ScheerThu, 10 Jan 2013 19:47:44 +0000
      • Christopher JonesThu, 10 Jan 2013 23:32:01 +0000
        • Gustavo LopesMon, 14 Jan 2013 10:42:28 +0000Re: strtr vs. str replace runtime
      • Gustavo LopesMon, 14 Jan 2013 21:55:33 +0000
        • Christopher JonesTue, 15 Jan 2013 00:13:40 +0000
        • Stas MalyshevTue, 15 Jan 2013 05:30:07 +0000
        • Gustavo LopesTue, 15 Jan 2013 20:51:02 +0000